• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成功后慢性完全闭塞患者1个月与12个月双联抗血小板治疗对比

1-Month Versus 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion After Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

作者信息

Zhao Shuai, Zhu Boda, Chen Yan, Yu Tiantong, Zhang Bohui, Zhang Xi, Han Peng, Chen Youhu, Chen Genrui, Yang Li, Tan Zhijun, Wang Gang, Jin Sida, Yang Yi, Wang Rutao, Li Chengxiang, Lian Kun

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Air Force Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, 610000, Sichuan, China.

Department of Cardiology, Xijing Hospital, The Fourth Military Medical University, 169 West Changle Road, Xi'an, 710032, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Drugs Aging. 2025 Oct;42(10):975-985. doi: 10.1007/s40266-025-01235-z. Epub 2025 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1007/s40266-025-01235-z
PMID:40751899
Abstract

PURPOSE

Compared with long-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT, aspirin with clopidogrel or ticagrelor), short-term DAPT followed by single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT, clopidogrel or ticagrelor) has demonstrated superiority in reducing bleeding risk while maintaining non-inferior in cardiovascular benefits in coronary heart disease (CHD) after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, no prospective study has explored the benefits of this short-term regimen on patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) undergoing PCI.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent successful elective CTO-PCI were prospectively enrolled from April 2019 to May 2021. After receiving 1-month DAPT, all patients were divided into two groups: SAPT group (followed by clopidogrel or ticagrelor monotherapy) and DAPT group (continued with dual antiplatelet therapy). Detailed baseline characteristics, angiographic and procedural details, and 1-year follow-up data were collected. The endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding.

RESULTS

A total of 701 patients who underwent successful CTO-PCI were enrolled, among whom 330 patients (47.1%) received DAPT and 371 patients (52.9%) received SAPT (clopidogrel or ticagrelor) after 1-month DAPT. Compared with patients receiving DAPT, patients in the SAPT (clopidogrel or ticagrelor) group had a lower rate of previous stroke, fewer left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) lesions and contrast volume, and fewer lesions per patient, but longer lesion length (P < 0.05). The incidence of MACE (14.5% versus 15.4%; p = 0.742) was not significantly different between the two groups. The DAPT group showed a higher incidence of minor bleeding (BARC types 1 or 2; 12.7% versus 2.3%, p < 0.001) than SAPT (clopidogrel or ticagrelor), while no difference was found for major bleeding (BARC types 3 or 5; 1.2% versus 2.3%, p = 0.261).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with standard 12-month DAPT, 1-month DAPT followed by clopidogrel or ticagrelor monotherapy resulted in lower bleeding risks and similar cardiovascular benefits in CTO-PCI patients.

摘要

目的

与长期双联抗血小板治疗(DAPT,阿司匹林联合氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛)相比,短期DAPT后序贯单药抗血小板治疗(SAPT,氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛)在降低出血风险方面已显示出优势,同时在成功进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的冠心病(CHD)患者中维持心血管获益不劣于长期治疗。然而,尚无前瞻性研究探讨这种短期治疗方案对接受PCI的慢性完全闭塞(CTO)患者的益处。

方法

前瞻性纳入2019年4月至2021年5月期间成功接受择期CTO-PCI的连续患者。在接受1个月的DAPT后,所有患者被分为两组:SAPT组(随后接受氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛单药治疗)和DAPT组(继续双联抗血小板治疗)。收集详细的基线特征、血管造影和手术细节以及1年随访数据。终点为主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和出血。

结果

共纳入701例成功接受CTO-PCI的患者,其中330例(47.1%)在接受1个月DAPT后接受DAPT治疗,371例(52.9%)接受SAPT(氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛)治疗。与接受DAPT的患者相比,SAPT(氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛)组患者既往卒中发生率较低,左前降支冠状动脉(LAD)病变和造影剂用量较少,每位患者的病变较少,但病变长度较长(P<0.05)。两组之间MACE的发生率(14.5%对15.4%;p=0.742)无显著差异。DAPT组轻微出血(BARC 1或2型;12.7%对2.3%,p<0.001)的发生率高于SAPT(氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛)组,而严重出血(BARC 3或5型;1.2%对2.3%,p=0.261)无差异。

结论

与标准的12个月DAPT相比,1个月DAPT后序贯氯吡格雷或替格瑞洛单药治疗在CTO-PCI患者中导致较低的出血风险和相似的心血管获益。

相似文献

1
1-Month Versus 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion After Successful Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗成功后慢性完全闭塞患者1个月与12个月双联抗血小板治疗对比
Drugs Aging. 2025 Oct;42(10):975-985. doi: 10.1007/s40266-025-01235-z. Epub 2025 Aug 2.
2
Indobufen versus aspirin after percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome.吲哚布芬与阿司匹林用于老年急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的比较
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-04843-0.
3
Rationale and design of randomized non-inferiority clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of ticagrelor monotherapy with dual antiplatelet therapy in chronic coronary syndrome patients post percutaneous coronary intervention (TICALONE-TAHA10 Protocol).比较替格瑞洛单药治疗与双重抗血小板治疗在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后慢性冠状动脉综合征患者中的安全性和有效性的随机非劣效性临床试验的原理与设计(TICALONE-TAHA10方案)
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 16;20(7):e0325663. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325663. eCollection 2025.
4
De-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy for patients with acute coronary syndrome after percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的降阶梯治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
BMJ Evid Based Med. 2024 May 22;29(3):171-186. doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112476.
5
Antiplatelet Strategy for Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的抗血小板策略:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):e032490. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.032490. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
6
Ticagrelor monotherapy versus ticagrelor plus aspirin in patients with chronic coronary syndrome and high ischaemic risk: a post hoc analysis of the TWILIGHT trial.替格瑞洛单药治疗与替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林用于慢性冠状动脉综合征且缺血风险高的患者:TWILIGHT试验的事后分析
EuroIntervention. 2025 May 16;21(10):550-559. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00973.
7
Deescalation From Ticagrelor to Clopidogrel for Myocardial Infarction With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.从替格瑞洛降阶梯至氯吡格雷用于慢性肾脏病合并心肌梗死:一项随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 May 1;8(5):e2511297. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.11297.
8
De-escalating Dual Antiplatelet Therapy to Ticagrelor Monotherapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome : A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.急性冠状动脉综合征中双联抗血小板治疗降级为替格瑞洛单药治疗:一项随机临床试验的系统评价和个体患者数据荟萃分析
Ann Intern Med. 2025 Apr;178(4):533-542. doi: 10.7326/ANNALS-24-03102. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
9
Temporal modulation (early escalation and late de-escalation) of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing complex high-risk PCI: rationale and design of the TAILORED-CHIP trial.复杂高危 PCI 患者抗血小板治疗的时间调制(早期强化和晚期下调):TAILORED-CHIP 试验的原理和设计。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Nov 4;20(21):e1355-e1362. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-24-00437.
10
Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stenting in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.急性冠状动脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架置入术后的短期双联抗血小板治疗:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Dec 1;9(12):1094-1105. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.3216.

本文引用的文献

1
De-escalation to ticagrelor monotherapy versus 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with and without acute coronary syndromes: a systematic review and individual patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials.在有和没有急性冠脉综合征的患者中,从双联抗血小板治疗降级为替格瑞洛单药治疗与继续双联抗血小板治疗 12 个月:一项随机试验的系统评价和个体患者水平荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2024 Sep 7;404(10456):937-948. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01616-7. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
2
Ticagrelor or Clopidogrel Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-Analysis.替格瑞洛或氯吡格雷单药治疗与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后双联抗血小板治疗:系统评价和患者水平荟萃分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 May 1;9(5):437-448. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2024.0133.
3
Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients at High Bleeding Risk Undergoing PCI.接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的高出血风险患者的双联抗血小板治疗持续时间
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Nov 23;78(21):2060-2072. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.08.074.
4
Ticagrelor monotherapy in patients at high bleeding risk undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: TWILIGHT-HBR.替格瑞洛单药治疗经皮冠状动脉介入治疗高出血风险患者:TWILIGHT-HBR。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 1;42(45):4624-4634. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab702.
5
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after PCI in Patients at High Bleeding Risk.高出血风险患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的双联抗血小板治疗。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 28;385(18):1643-1655. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2108749. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
6
Aspirin versus clopidogrel for chronic maintenance monotherapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (HOST-EXAM): an investigator-initiated, prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre trial.阿司匹林与氯吡格雷用于经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(HOST-EXAM)后慢性维持单药治疗:一项由研究者发起的、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、多中心试验。
Lancet. 2021 Jun 26;397(10293):2487-2496. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01063-1. Epub 2021 May 16.
7
A Novel Algorithm for Treating Chronic Total Coronary Artery Occlusion.一种治疗慢性完全性冠状动脉闭塞的新算法。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Nov 12;74(19):2392-2404. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1049.
8
Technical and procedural outcomes of the retrograde approach to chronic total occlusion interventions.逆行技术治疗慢性完全闭塞病变的技术和操作结果。
EuroIntervention. 2020 Dec 4;16(11):e891-e899. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-19-00441.
9
Impact of long-term ticagrelor monotherapy following 1-month dual antiplatelet therapy in patients who underwent complex percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the Global Leaders trial.接受复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者在 1 个月双联抗血小板治疗后长期使用替格瑞洛单药治疗的影响:来自全球领导者试验的见解。
Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 14;40(31):2595-2604. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz453.
10
Effect of P2Y12 Inhibitor Monotherapy vs Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SMART-CHOICE Randomized Clinical Trial.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者中 P2Y12 抑制剂单药治疗与双联抗血小板治疗对心血管事件的影响:SMART-CHOICE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Jun 25;321(24):2428-2437. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8146.