Suppr超能文献

研究报告:使用欧洲药典专论模型对过量接种后减毒和未减毒艾美耳球虫疫苗安全性的比较

Research note: Comparison of live attenuated and non-attenuated Eimeria vaccines on safety following overdose administration using the European pharmacopoeia monograph model.

作者信息

Pagès Marc, Albó Andreu, Bech-Sàbat Gregori, Morató Roser, Molist-Badiola Joan, Dardi Martina

机构信息

HIPRA S.A. Amer, Girona, Spain.

HIPRA S.A. Amer, Girona, Spain.

出版信息

Poult Sci. 2025 Jul 25;104(10):105610. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2025.105610.

Abstract

Live non-attenuated and attenuated coccidiosis vaccines are available and induce a solid immune response to Eimeria spp. However, knowledge regarding the safety of live non-attenuated Eimeria vaccines is still limited. This fourteen-day, randomized, controlled, blind study was aimed to compare the safety profiles of a live attenuated and two live non-attenuated coccidiosis vaccines administered at overdose (10x) in chickens, following the standard model established in the European Pharmacopeia (Ph. Eur.) monograph. Fourteen-day old chickens (n=160) were randomized into four groups (1:1:1:1 ratio) balanced by weight to receive a commercial live attenuated vaccine, two commercial live non-attenuated vaccines, or PBS (control). Three birds died during the study, with only one death being attributable to inoculation of a non-attenuated vaccine. Few birds displayed clinical signs in the attenuated vaccine group, whereas those in the non-attenuated vaccine groups had bloody feces and gradually increased affected chickens. Animals receiving the attenuated vaccine had no or mild (grade 1) intestinal lesions compared to those receiving the non-attenuated vaccine with mild to moderate (grade 2) and for one of the vaccines also severe lesions (grade 3). Birds receiving the attenuated vaccine showed significantly increased mean body weight at day 14 (P < 0.001), without differences from the control group. Feed consumption was similar and lower in the control and attenuated vaccine groups, while was higher in the non-attenuated vaccine groups (from day 6 to day 14), indicating a more efficient feed conversion ratio (not significant). Birds receiving non-attenuated vaccines excreted more oocysts at later time points than birds receiving the attenuated vaccine. The attenuated Eimeria vaccine showed a favorable safety profile compared to non-attenuated vaccines regarding clinical signs and intestinal lesions, with no impact on body weight and feed conversion ratio under experimental conditions in SPF chickens, suggesting that this coccidiosis prevention strategy may contribute to decreasing coccidiosis costs.

摘要

活的非减毒和减毒虫球虫病疫苗均可获得,且能对艾美耳属寄生虫产生可靠的免疫反应。然而,关于活的非减毒虫球虫病疫苗安全性的知识仍然有限。这项为期14天的随机对照盲法研究旨在按照欧洲药典(Ph. Eur.)专论中建立的标准模型,比较在鸡中过量(10倍)接种的一种活的减毒虫球虫病疫苗和两种活的非减毒虫球虫病疫苗的安全性。14日龄的鸡(n = 160)按体重随机分为四组(比例为1:1:1:1),分别接受一种商业活的减毒疫苗、两种商业活的非减毒疫苗或PBS(对照)。研究期间有3只鸡死亡,其中只有1只死亡归因于接种非减毒疫苗。减毒疫苗组很少有鸡出现临床症状,而非减毒疫苗组的鸡有血便,且受影响的鸡逐渐增多。与接受非减毒疫苗的鸡相比,接受减毒疫苗的动物没有或仅有轻度(1级)肠道病变,而非减毒疫苗组的鸡有轻度至中度(2级)肠道病变,其中一种疫苗还导致严重病变(3级)。接受减毒疫苗的鸡在第14天平均体重显著增加(P < 0.001),与对照组无差异。对照组和减毒疫苗组的采食量相似且较低,而非减毒疫苗组在第6天至第14天采食量较高,表明饲料转化率更高(无显著性差异)。接受非减毒疫苗的鸡在后期排泄的卵囊比接受减毒疫苗的鸡更多。在SPF鸡的实验条件下,与非减毒疫苗相比,减毒虫球虫病疫苗在临床症状和肠道病变方面显示出良好的安全性,对体重和饲料转化率没有影响,这表明这种球虫病预防策略可能有助于降低球虫病成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a91a/12341587/bd537a34ef57/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验