Suppr超能文献

用于检测多系统萎缩中轻度认知障碍和痴呆的简易精神状态检查表及蒙特利尔认知评估量表的最佳截断分数。

Optimal cut-off scores for the Mini Mental State Examination and Montreal Cognitive Assessment to detect MCI and dementia in Multiple System Atrophy.

作者信息

Cuoco Sofia, Carotenuto Immacolata, Russillo Maria Claudia, Andreozzi Valentina, Picillo Marina, Amboni Marianna, Erro Roberto, Soricelli Andrea, Barone Paolo, Pellecchia Maria Teresa

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Neuroscience Section, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy.

Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", Neuroscience Section, University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy; Department of Neurology, "Umberto I" Hospital, Nocera Inferiore, Italy.

出版信息

Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2025 Sep;138:107974. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2025.107974. Epub 2025 Jul 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia are reported in up to 44 % and 7 % of patients with Multiple system atrophy (MSA), respectively. The sensitivity and discriminative power of brief cognitive screening tools such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) for detecting MCI and dementia in MSA has not yet been evaluated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the optimal cut-off scores of the MMSE and MoCA for accurately differentiating MSA patients with MCI and dementia from those with normal cognition. The fluency item of MoCA was also assessed separately for the same purpose.

METHODS

Sixty-two MSA patients underwent a comprehensive II level neuropsychological evaluation, in order to diagnose dementia or MCI. ROC analyses were used to establish the optimal cut-off scores for MCI and dementia, respectively.

RESULTS

According to the II level neuropsychological evaluation, 4.8 % of MSA patients met criteria for dementia and 53,2 % for MCI. The optimal MMSE cut-off scores were 20.5 for dementia (AUC = 0.915) and 26.5 for MCI (AUC = 0.698). For MoCA, the most accurate cut-offs were 14.0 to detect dementia (AUC = 0.919) and 19.5 to detect MCI (AUC = 0.702).ROC analysis suggested that both tests were more accurate to identify MCI than dementia. The optimal cut-off for MoCA fluency item to identify MCI was 8.5 words (AUC = 0.717).

CONCLUSION

Our findings support MMSE and MoCA as effective and accessible tools to detect MCI and dementia in MSA. MoCA fluency item emerged as a reliable tool to detect MCI.

摘要

背景

多系统萎缩(MSA)患者中,轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆的报告发生率分别高达44%和7%。简易认知筛查工具,如简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)和蒙特利尔认知评估量表(MoCA),用于检测MSA患者的MCI和痴呆的敏感性及鉴别能力尚未得到评估。

目的

本研究旨在确定MMSE和MoCA的最佳临界值,以准确区分患有MCI和痴呆的MSA患者与认知正常的患者。为达到同样目的,还单独评估了MoCA的语言流畅性项目。

方法

62例MSA患者接受了全面的二级神经心理学评估,以诊断痴呆或MCI。采用ROC分析分别确定MCI和痴呆的最佳临界值。

结果

根据二级神经心理学评估,4.8%的MSA患者符合痴呆标准,53.2%符合MCI标准。MMSE检测痴呆的最佳临界值为20.5(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.915),检测MCI的最佳临界值为26.5(AUC=0.698)。对于MoCA,检测痴呆的最准确临界值为14.0(AUC=0.919),检测MCI的最准确临界值为19.5(AUC=0.702)。ROC分析表明,两种测试在识别MCI方面比识别痴呆更准确。MoCA语言流畅性项目识别MCI的最佳临界值为8.5个单词(AUC=0.717)。

结论

我们的研究结果支持MMSE和MoCA作为检测MSA患者MCI和痴呆的有效且易用的工具。MoCA语言流畅性项目是检测MCI的可靠工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验