Suppr超能文献

在堕胎合法的州,多布斯诉杰克逊最高法院判决前后通过远程医疗对药物流产的需求。

Demand for Medication Abortion Through Telehealth Before and After the Dobbs v. Jackson Supreme Court Decision in States Where Abortion Is Legal.

作者信息

Fiastro Anna E, Brown Elissa, Gomperts Rebecca, Godfrey Emily M

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

出版信息

Womens Health Issues. 2025 Aug 1. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2025.06.003.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The provision of medication abortion through telehealth accounts for an increasing share of total abortions in the United States, offering a private and affordable option for patients in both restrictive and supportive states. This study compares demand for telehealth medication abortion before and after the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization (Dobbs) in states where abortion access is protected, to understand how patients seeking care in supportive states may have been impacted by the landmark decision.

METHODS

We compared the volume of patients receiving medication abortion from a U.S.-based telehealth service in 18 states, the sociodemographic characteristics of patients, and self-reported reasons for choosing telehealth before and after the Dobbs decision using electronic medical records from March 24, 2022-September 24, 2022. All states examined support legal access to abortion; results were stratified to compare two levels of protective abortion policies.

RESULTS

A total of 6,296 patients received medication abortion through telehealth during the study period. Daily demand increased by 74%, from an average of 25.0 patients per day in the pre-Dobbs period to 43.4 patients per day post-Dobbs (difference 18.4; 95% confidence interval [15.4, 21.5]; p < .001). No sociodemographic differences were observed between patient populations before and after the Dobbs decision. Comfort and privacy were the most frequently selected reasons for choosing telehealth in both time periods. Concern over legal restrictions was more frequently cited after the Dobbs decision. A larger increase in demand (88%) was observed in states with fewer protections post-Dobbs compared with states with the most protective policies (68%) (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Demand for telehealth medication abortion increased after the Dobbs decision in states where abortion remained legal. Telehealth provides an essential pathway to access safe and effective abortion care for a broad range of patients across different policy environments.

摘要

目的

通过远程医疗提供药物流产在美国总流产数中所占份额日益增加,为处于限制堕胎和支持堕胎的州的患者提供了一种私密且经济实惠的选择。本研究比较了美国最高法院对多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案(多布斯案)做出裁决前后,堕胎权受保护的州对远程医疗药物流产的需求,以了解在支持堕胎的州寻求医疗服务的患者可能受到这一具有里程碑意义的裁决的何种影响。

方法

我们使用2022年3月24日至2022年9月24日的电子病历,比较了18个州接受基于美国的远程医疗服务进行药物流产的患者数量、患者的社会人口统计学特征,以及多布斯案裁决前后患者自我报告的选择远程医疗的原因。所有被研究的州都支持合法堕胎;结果进行了分层,以比较两种保护堕胎政策水平。

结果

在研究期间,共有6296名患者通过远程医疗接受了药物流产。每日需求增长了74%,从多布斯案裁决前的平均每天25.0名患者增加到多布斯案裁决后的每天43.4名患者(差异为18.4;95%置信区间[15.4, 21.5];p <.001)。多布斯案裁决前后的患者群体在社会人口统计学方面没有差异。舒适和隐私是两个时期最常被选择的选择远程医疗的原因。多布斯案裁决后,对法律限制的担忧被更频繁地提及。与拥有最具保护性政策的州(68%)相比,多布斯案裁决后保护措施较少的州需求增长幅度更大(88%)(p <.001)。

结论

在堕胎仍合法的州,多布斯案裁决后对远程医疗药物流产的需求增加。远程医疗为不同政策环境下的广大患者提供了获得安全有效堕胎护理的重要途径。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验