Wallace M Ariel Geer, Jackson Stephen R, Preston William T, Miles Laura, Calder Hannah, Davies Stephen, Cumbes Morgane
U.S. EPA, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Air Methods and Characterization Division, 109 TW. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711, USA.
U.S. EPA, Center for Environmental Measurement and Modeling, Air Methods and Characterization Division, 109 TW. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711, USA.
J Chromatogr A. 2025 Sep 27;1759:466226. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2025.466226. Epub 2025 Jul 17.
The production and emission of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) has become a cause of concern due to their environmental persistence, accumulation, and potential health impacts. There are few methods for measuring air emissions of PFAS from fluorochemical manufacturing facilities and products of incomplete combustion or destruction (PICs/PIDs) that may be formed during incineration of PFAS-containing materials. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) developed Other Test Method (OTM)-50, a canister sampling and thermal desorption-gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (TD-GC/MS) analysis method for measuring volatile fluorinated compounds (VFCs) from stationary source emissions. Here, we describe the experiments that were conducted to develop the optimized analytical methods for samples that may contain high humidity and carbon dioxide (CO) levels. A prototype preconcentrator with a focusing trap capable of reaching -100 °C was used to improve retention of tetrafluoromethane (CF), but the lower temperature also trapped more CO, which caused signal suppression of CF as well as hexafluoroethane, chlorodifluoromethane, tetrafluoroethene, and trifluoromethane. Therefore, the optimized method utilized a low trap temperature of -30 °C to avoid trapping high levels of CO that may be present in stationary source samples. We found that increasing the dry purge time to nine minutes during preconcentration eliminated enough CO to recover target compounds within ±30 % of the standard value, as required by OTM-50. The method was used to analyze samples collected in the absence and presence of high CO levels to demonstrate the precision of the method even under challenging conditions.