Narváez Sofía, Arnalda Natalia, López Marisa, Vergara Andrea, Guilera Vanessa, Chivite Iván, García-Hernández David, González-Cordón Ana, Riera-Monroig Josep, Fuertes Irene, Mallolas Josep, Blanco José Luis, Bosch Jordi
Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
Department of Microbiology, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain; ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin (Engl Ed). 2025 Aug-Sep;43(7):374-377. doi: 10.1016/j.eimce.2024.11.009.
Detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is periodically indicated in asymptomatic patients with risky sexual practices. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of employing a rapid polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in a combined pool of three samples from the same patient and compare it with the standard PCR performed in the three different samples separately.
Samples were collected from asymptomatic patients at risk of sexually transmitted infections (STI). Urine samples, two pharyngeal swabs, and two rectal swabs were collected from each patient. Two PCR techniques were performed: standard PCR (Allplex CT/NG/MG/TV®, Seegene) in each of the three samples separately, and rapid PCR (Xpert CT/NG®, Cepheid) in a pool of three samples.
A total of 429 pooled samples from 403 patients were included in the study, and 426 urine samples, 412 rectal swabs and 426 pharyngeal swabs were also processed. Concordances between pooled and individual PCRs for both CT and NG identification were 94.17%, with 77 (17.9%) positive samples. The concordance for CT was 98.60%, with 38 positive samples (8.88%), being 95.33% for NG, with 51 positive samples (11.88%).
The use of a pool of three samples (urine, rectum and pharynx) for the detection of NG and CT using rapid PCR can be a cost-effective alternative to performing conventional PCR in the three samples separately in asymptomatic patients at risk of developing STI.
对于有危险性行为的无症状患者,需定期检测淋病奈瑟菌(NG)和沙眼衣原体(CT)。本研究的目的是评估在同一患者的三个样本合并池中采用快速聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测的效果,并将其与分别在三个不同样本中进行的标准PCR检测进行比较。
从有性传播感染(STI)风险的无症状患者中采集样本。从每位患者收集尿液样本、两根咽拭子和两根直肠拭子。进行了两种PCR技术检测:分别在三个样本中的每一个样本上进行标准PCR(Allplex CT/NG/MG/TV®,Seegene),以及在三个样本的合并池中进行快速PCR(Xpert CT/NG®,Cepheid)。
本研究共纳入了来自403名患者的429个合并样本,还处理了426份尿液样本、412份直肠拭子和426份咽拭子。在CT和NG鉴定方面,合并PCR与单独PCR之间的一致性为94.17%,有77个(17.9%)阳性样本。CT的一致性为98.60%,有38个阳性样本(8.88%),NG的一致性为95.33%,有51个阳性样本(11.88%)。
对于有发展为STI风险的无症状患者,使用三个样本(尿液、直肠和咽部)的合并池通过快速PCR检测NG和CT,可能是一种比分别在三个样本中进行传统PCR更具成本效益的替代方法。