• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
[A preoperative prediction model for pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer: Integrating clinical characteristics and multiparametric MRI].[一种前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移的术前预测模型:整合临床特征和多参数磁共振成像]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Aug 18;57(4):684-691. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.04.009.
2
Integrating Genomic Classifiers and Nonsuspicious Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Predictive Modelling for Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer.将基因组分类器与非可疑磁共振成像结果整合用于局限性前列腺癌患者淋巴结转移的预测建模
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2025 Aug;23(4):102364. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2025.102364. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
3
[Predictive value of bpMRI for pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer patients with PSA≤20 μg/L].[bpMRI对前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)≤20μg/L的前列腺癌患者盆腔淋巴结转移的预测价值]
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2025 May;31(5):426-431.
4
An integrated nomogram combining deep learning, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring, and clinical variables for identification of clinically significant prostate cancer on biparametric MRI: a retrospective multicentre study.基于深度学习、前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分以及临床变量的列线图模型鉴别双侧磁共振成像前列腺癌的临床意义:一项回顾性多中心研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2021 Jul;3(7):e445-e454. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00082-0.
5
Development and Internal Validation of a Novel Model to Identify the Candidates for Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer.开发并内部验证一种新型模型,以确定前列腺癌患者行扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的候选者。
Eur Urol. 2017 Oct;72(4):632-640. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.03.049. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
6
Pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer.前列腺癌的盆腔淋巴结清扫术
Eur Urol. 2009 Jun;55(6):1251-65. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.03.012. Epub 2009 Mar 10.
7
Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.阴性前列腺特异性膜抗原正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描能否避免新诊断前列腺癌患者进行盆腔淋巴结清扫?一项以病理组织学为参考标准的系统评价和Meta分析
Eur Urol Oncol. 2022 Feb;5(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Sep 17.
8
External validation of the updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.预测接受扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌患者淋巴结侵犯的更新列线图的外部验证
Urol Int. 2013;90(3):277-82. doi: 10.1159/000343993. Epub 2012 Dec 22.
9
External validation of nomograms including PSMA PET information for the prediction of lymph node involvement of prostate cancer.包含PSMA PET信息的列线图用于预测前列腺癌淋巴结受累情况的外部验证
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Apr 2. doi: 10.1007/s00259-025-07241-y.
10
Exploration of the diagnostic capacity of PSAMR combined with PI-RADS scoring for clinically significant prostate cancer and establishment and validation of the Nomogram prediction model.探讨 PSAMR 联合 PI-RADS 评分对临床显著前列腺癌的诊断能力,并建立和验证列线图预测模型。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Oct;149(13):11309-11317. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05008-2. Epub 2023 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
PSMA PET vs. mpMRI for Lymph Node Metastasis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Head-to-Head Comparative Meta-analysis.前列腺癌淋巴结转移的PSMA PET与多参数磁共振成像对比:一项系统评价和直接比较的Meta分析
Acad Radiol. 2025 May;32(5):2797-2814. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.029. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
2
EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2024 Update. Part I: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent.EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-ISUP-SIOG 前列腺癌指南-2024 更新。第一部分:筛查、诊断和以治愈为目的的局部治疗。
Eur Urol. 2024 Aug;86(2):148-163. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.03.027. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
3
The role and controversy of pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer treatment: a focused review.盆腔淋巴结清扫术在前列腺癌治疗中的作用和争议:重点综述。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 26;22(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03344-2.
4
Development and internal validation of a novel nomogram for predicting lymph node invasion for prostate cancer patients undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection.一种用于预测接受扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的前列腺癌患者淋巴结侵犯的新型列线图的开发与内部验证
Front Oncol. 2023 May 8;13:1186319. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1186319. eCollection 2023.
5
Development and validation of novel nomogram to identify the candidates for extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer patients in the robotic era.开发并验证一种新型列线图,以确定机器人时代前列腺癌患者行扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术的候选者。
Int J Urol. 2023 Aug;30(8):659-665. doi: 10.1111/iju.15195. Epub 2023 May 2.
6
MRI fat fraction imaging of nodal and bone metastases in prostate cancer.前列腺癌淋巴结及骨转移的MRI脂肪分数成像
Eur Radiol. 2023 Aug;33(8):5851-5855. doi: 10.1007/s00330-023-09527-x. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
7
The combination of prostate MRI PI-RADS scoring system and a genomic classifier is associated with pelvic lymph node metastasis at the time of radical prostatectomy.前列腺 MRI PI-RADS 评分系统与基因组分类器的联合应用与根治性前列腺切除术后盆腔淋巴结转移相关。
Br J Radiol. 2023 Mar 1;96(1144):20220663. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20220663. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
8
A Nomogram for Predicting Prostate Cancer with Lymph Node Involvement in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Era: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (The MSUG94 Group).预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术时代伴有淋巴结转移的前列腺癌的列线图:日本的一项回顾性多中心队列研究(MSUG94组)
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Oct 20;12(10):2545. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12102545.
9
Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline, Part II: Principles of Active Surveillance, Principles of Surgery, and Follow-Up.临床局限性前列腺癌:AUA/ASTRO 指南,第二部分:主动监测原则、手术原则和随访。
J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):19-25. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002758. Epub 2022 May 10.
10
Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO Guideline, Part I: Introduction, Risk Assessment, Staging, and Risk-Based Management.临床局限性前列腺癌:AUA/ASTRO 指南,第 I 部分:介绍、风险评估、分期和基于风险的管理。
J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):10-18. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000002757. Epub 2022 May 10.

[一种前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移的术前预测模型:整合临床特征和多参数磁共振成像]

[A preoperative prediction model for pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer: Integrating clinical characteristics and multiparametric MRI].

作者信息

Wang Z, Yu S, Zheng H, Tao J, Fan Y, Zhang X

机构信息

Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450000, China.

出版信息

Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Aug 18;57(4):684-691. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.04.009.

DOI:10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2025.04.009
PMID:40754904
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12330916/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the clinical features associated with pelvic lymph node metastasis (PLNM) in prostate cancer and to construct a preoperative prediction model for PLNM, thereby reducing unnecessary extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND).

METHODS

Based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, 344 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and ePLND at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between 2014 and 2024 were retrospectively enrolled, among whom, 77 patients (22.4%) were pathologically confirmed to have lymph node-positive disease. The clinical characteristics, MRI reports, and pathological results were collected. The data were then randomly divi-ded into a training cohort (241 cases, 70%) and a validation cohort (103 cases, 30%). Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were employed to construct a preoperative prediction model for PLNM.

RESULTS

Univariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that total prostate specific antigen (tPSA) (=0.021), free prostate specific antigen (fPSA) (=0.002), fPSA to tPSA ratio (fPSA/tPSA) (=0.011), percentage of positive biopsy cores ( < 0.001), prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score (=0.004), biopsy Gleason score ≥8 (=0.005), clinical T stage ( < 0.001), and MRI-indicated lymph node involvement (MRI-LNI) ( < 0.001) were significant predictors of PLNM. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the percentage of positive biopsy cores (=91.24, 95%: 13.34-968.68), PI-RADS score (=7.64, 95%: 1.78-138.06), and MRI-LNI (=4.67, 95%: 1.74-13.24) were independent risk factors for PLNM. And a novel nomogram for predicting PLNM was developed by integrating all these three variables. Compared with the individual predictors: percentage of positive biopsy cores [area under curve (AUC)=0.806], PI-RADS score (AUC=0.679), and MRI-LNI (AUC=0.768), the multivariate model incorporating all three variables demonstrated significantly superior predictive performance (AUC=0.883). Consistently, calibration curves and decision curve analyses confirmed that the multivariable model had high predictive accuracy and provided significant net clinical benefit relative to single-variable models. And using a cutoff of 6%, the multiparameter model missed only approximately 5.2% of PLNM cases (4/77), while reducing approximately 53% of ePLND procedures (139/267), demonstrating favorable predictive efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Percentage of positive biopsy cores, PI-RADS score and MRI-LNI are independent risk factors for PLNM. The constructed multivariate model significantly improves predictive efficacy, offering a valuable tool to guide clinical decisions on ePLND.

摘要

目的

分析前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结转移(PLNM)相关的临床特征,并构建PLNM的术前预测模型,从而减少不必要的扩大盆腔淋巴结清扫术(ePLND)。

方法

根据预先定义的纳入和排除标准,回顾性纳入2014年至2024年期间在郑州大学第一附属医院接受根治性前列腺切除术和ePLND的344例患者,其中77例(22.4%)经病理证实有淋巴结阳性疾病。收集临床特征、MRI报告和病理结果。然后将数据随机分为训练队列(241例,70%)和验证队列(103例,30%)。采用单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析构建PLNM的术前预测模型。

结果

单因素Logistic回归分析显示,总前列腺特异性抗原(tPSA)(=0.021)、游离前列腺特异性抗原(fPSA)(=0.002)、fPSA与tPSA比值(fPSA/tPSA)(=0.011)、阳性活检核心百分比(<0.001)、前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分(=0.004)、活检Gleason评分≥8(=0.005)、临床T分期(<0.001)和MRI提示的淋巴结受累(MRI-LNI)(<0.001)是PLNM的显著预测因素。多因素Logistic回归分析表明,阳性活检核心百分比(=91.24,95%:13.34-968.68)、PI-RADS评分(=7.64,95%:1.78-138.06)和MRI-LNI(=4.67,95%:1.74-13.24)是PLNM的独立危险因素。通过整合这三个变量开发了一种新的预测PLNM的列线图。与单个预测因素相比:阳性活检核心百分比[曲线下面积(AUC)=0.806]、PI-RADS评分(AUC=0.679)和MRI-LNI(AUC=0.768),包含所有三个变量的多变量模型显示出显著优越的预测性能(AUC=0.883)。同样,校准曲线和决策曲线分析证实,多变量模型具有较高的预测准确性,相对于单变量模型提供了显著的净临床益处。使用6%的截断值,多参数模型仅漏诊了约5.2%的PLNM病例(4/77),同时减少了约53%的ePLND手术(139/267),显示出良好的预测效果。

结论

阳性活检核心百分比、PI-RADS评分和MRI-LNI是PLNM的独立危险因素。构建的多变量模型显著提高了预测效能,为指导ePLND的临床决策提供了有价值的工具。