Conde-Camacho R, Orozco-Levi M, Londoño A, Gómez-Palau R, Tuta-Quintero E, Naranjo A, Díaz K, De Luque J, Goldfeder S, Giraldo-Cadavid L F, Guerrero M C
Department of Pulmonary Hypertension Fundación Neumológica Colombiana Bogotá Colombia.
PhD candidate in Biosciences Universidad de La Sabana Chía Colombia.
Pulm Circ. 2025 Aug 3;15(3):e70145. doi: 10.1002/pul2.70145. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) in intermediate-risk patients poses a challenge for clinicians, particularly in determining the optimal timing for escalating pharmacological treatment. We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional study that analyzed data from the Colombian Pulmonary Hypertension Network (HAPredCO) on patients diagnosed with PAH. Participants were stratified into low- and high-intermediate risk groups using the four-level ESC/ERS score, which incorporates optimized cutoff values for WHO functional class (WHO FC), the 6-min walk test (6MWT), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)/brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration. A bivariate analysis was conducted to compare study variables at baseline and during clinical follow-up. Additionally, a survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier curves to compare outcomes between the intermediate-risk groups. A total of 175 patients were analyzed, with a mean age of 44.85 years (SD 15.5), of which 86% (150/175) were women. In the baseline, a total of 75% (131/175) were classified as intermediate-low-risk. In clinical follow-up, 40% (61/154) were classified as intermediate-low-risk, 21% (32/154) were classified as intermediate-low-risk, 23% (35/154) were classified as intermediate-low-risk, and 16% (26/154) as intermediate-high-risk. At baseline, WHO FC III was 61% (107/174), compared to 35% (56/154) at follow-up ( = 0.083). The use of bosentan decreased from 36% (63/175) to 28% (46/154) ( < 0.001), while ambrisentan increased from 18% (31/175) to 30% (47/154), and macitentan increased from 25% (44/175) to 36% (57/154). The use of parenteral prostanoids and selexipag increased by 20% (4% vs. 24%) and 3% (1% vs. 4%) during clinical follow-up, respectively. Overall survival at 1 year of follow-up was 96%, at 2 years 92%, and at 3 years 88%. The survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 98%, 95%, and 90% in the intermediate-low-risk group, and 90%, 80%, and 80% in the intermediate-high-risk group. In this real-world study of PAH in the Colombian HAPredCO registry, the median survival in the intermediate-low-risk group was slightly higher than in the intermediate-high-risk group. At baseline, most patients were classified as intermediate-low-risk. However, during clinical follow-up, risk distribution changed, with a notable proportion shifting across different risk categories.
中度风险患者的肺动脉高压(PAH)给临床医生带来了挑战,尤其是在确定升级药物治疗的最佳时机方面。我们开展了一项多中心横断面研究,分析了来自哥伦比亚肺动脉高压网络(HAPredCO)的PAH确诊患者的数据。使用四级ESC/ERS评分将参与者分为低中度和高中度风险组,该评分纳入了世界卫生组织功能分级(WHO FC)、6分钟步行试验(6MWT)以及N末端脑钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)/脑钠肽(BNP)浓度的优化临界值。进行双变量分析以比较基线和临床随访期间的研究变量。此外,使用Kaplan-Meier曲线进行生存分析,以比较中度风险组之间的结局。共分析了175例患者,平均年龄44.85岁(标准差15.5),其中86%(150/175)为女性。在基线时,共有75%(131/175)被归类为低中度风险。在临床随访中,40%(61/154)被归类为低中度风险,21%(32/154)被归类为低中度风险,23%(35/154)被归类为低中度风险,16%(26/154)被归类为高中度风险。在基线时,WHO FC III为61%(107/174),随访时为35%(56/154)(P = 0.083)。波生坦的使用从36%(63/175)降至28%(46/154)(P < 0.001),而安立生坦从从18%(31/175)增至30%(47/154),马昔腾坦从25%(44/175)增至36%(57/154)。在临床随访期间,肠外前列腺素和司来帕格的使用分别增加了20%(4%对24%)和3%(1%对4%)。随访1年时的总生存率为96%,2年时为92%,3年时为88%。低中度风险组1年、2年和3年的生存率分别为98%、95%和90%,高中度风险组分别为90%、80%和80%。在这项对哥伦比亚HAPredCO注册中心PAH的真实世界研究中,低中度风险组的中位生存期略高于高中度风险组。在基线时,大多数患者被归类为低中度风险。然而,在临床随访期间,风险分布发生了变化,相当一部分患者在不同风险类别之间转移。