Suppr超能文献

超声造影与吲哚菁绿淋巴造影用于淋巴绘图的对比评估:一项回顾性研究

Comparative Evaluation of Contrast-enhanced Ultrasound and Indocyanine Green Lymphography for Lymphatic Mapping: A Retrospective Study.

作者信息

Bustos Samyd S, Rios Maria, Jang Samuel, Hesley Gina K, Lee Christine U, Tran Nho V, Fahradyan Vahe

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Aug 1;13(8):e7022. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000007022. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) is an effective surgical treatment for extremity lymphedema. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent lymphography, the traditional standard for imaging lymphatic vessels, has limitations, including difficulty depicting deeper or congested lymphatics and contraindication in iodine hypersensitivity. This study evaluated contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with microbubbles for identifying lymphatic vessels for LVA and compared it with ICG lymphography.

METHODS

In this single-center retrospective review, intraoperative CEUS with intradermal injection of microbubble suspension (Lumason, Bracco Diagnostics, Inc.) was used in patients before LVA surgery between October 2019 and February 2023. Pre- or intraoperative ICG lymphography was also used to identify target lymphatic vessels. All patients diagnosed with primary or secondary extremity lymphedema who underwent LVA were included. Technical success rate was defined as lymphatic vessels identified by CEUS that led to successful LVAs. Descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients underwent LVA surgery, with a mean age of 58.5 ± 13.9 years. CEUS identified lymphatic vessels in all 32 patients, including 7 in whom ICG failed. Two patients with ICG allergy underwent CEUS only. CEUS identified more candidate lymphatics per patient (5.3 ± 4.2) compared with ICG (2.5 ± 2.7). Of the 182 anastomoses, 96 (52.8%) were identified by both CEUS and ICG, 75 (41.2%) by CEUS only, and 11 (6%) by ICG only.

CONCLUSIONS

CEUS is a promising tool for identifying lymphatic vessels in patients with lymphedema undergoing LVA, particularly when ICG lymphography is inadequate or contraindicated.

摘要

背景

淋巴管静脉吻合术(LVA)是治疗肢体淋巴水肿的一种有效手术方法。吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光淋巴造影术是淋巴管成像的传统标准方法,但存在局限性,包括难以描绘深部或充血的淋巴管以及碘过敏者禁忌使用。本研究评估了使用微泡的对比增强超声(CEUS)用于识别LVA的淋巴管,并将其与ICG淋巴造影术进行比较。

方法

在这项单中心回顾性研究中,2019年10月至2023年2月期间,对LVA手术前的患者采用术中皮内注射微泡混悬液(Lumason,意大利博莱科诊断公司)的CEUS检查。术前或术中也使用ICG淋巴造影术来识别目标淋巴管。纳入所有诊断为原发性或继发性肢体淋巴水肿并接受LVA手术的患者。技术成功率定义为通过CEUS识别出的淋巴管导致LVA手术成功。采用描述性统计分析。

结果

32例患者接受了LVA手术,平均年龄为58.5±13.9岁。CEUS在所有32例患者中均识别出淋巴管,其中7例ICG检查失败。2例对ICG过敏的患者仅接受了CEUS检查。与ICG(2.5±2.7)相比,CEUS识别出的每位患者候选淋巴管更多(5.3±4.2)。在182处吻合术中,96处(52.8%)通过CEUS和ICG均能识别,75处(41.2%)仅通过CEUS识别,11处(6%)仅通过ICG识别。

结论

对于接受LVA手术的淋巴水肿患者,CEUS是一种很有前景的识别淋巴管的工具,尤其是在ICG淋巴造影不足或禁忌时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验