Huang Li-Wen, Wu Yee-Jen, Lin Fang-Ju, Wu Chien-Chih, Huang Hsin-Yi, Wang Chi-Chuan, Li Xiaojuan
Graduate Institute of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Department of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Aug 4. doi: 10.1002/cpt.70017.
Prasugrel is recommended for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, East Asians exhibit a stronger antiplatelet response, raising concerns about bleeding risks with standard dosing. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the real-world effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose prasugrel in an East Asian population by emulating the pivotal PRASFIT-ACS trial using Taiwan's National Health Insurance claims data. In this study, ACS patients were classified into reduced-dose prasugrel or clopidogrel groups post-PCI. We estimated the intention-to-treat effect of initiating reduced-dose prasugrel vs. clopidogrel on the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and the per-protocol effect of treating with reduced-dose prasugrel on major bleeding risk using Cox proportional hazard models. A total of 4833 ACS patients were analyzed, including 977 (20.2%) who received reduced-dose prasugrel. Reduced-dose prasugrel showed comparable effectiveness to clopidogrel in preventing MACE (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.72-1.29) and did not increase bleeding risk (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.36-1.90), consistent with PRASFIT-ACS results (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.62-1.16; HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.39-1.73). A significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality was observed (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.89), differing from PRASFIT-ACS findings (HR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.48-3.06). Our results suggest that reduced-dose prasugrel was effective in preventing thrombotic events in the Taiwanese population without significantly increasing bleeding risk. These findings align with pivotal trial outcomes while highlighting the importance of race-specific dose adjustments to optimize ACS treatment strategies. Further research is needed to evaluate whether these results are applicable to other East Asian populations.
普拉格雷被推荐用于接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者。然而,东亚人表现出更强的抗血小板反应,这引发了对标准剂量下出血风险的担忧。这项回顾性队列研究通过使用台湾国民健康保险理赔数据模拟关键的PRASFIT - ACS试验,评估了东亚人群中低剂量普拉格雷的实际有效性和安全性。在本研究中,ACS患者在PCI术后被分为低剂量普拉格雷组或氯吡格雷组。我们使用Cox比例风险模型估计了起始低剂量普拉格雷与氯吡格雷相比对主要不良心血管事件(MACE)风险的意向性治疗效果,以及低剂量普拉格雷治疗对大出血风险的符合方案分析效果。总共分析了4833例ACS患者,其中977例(20.2%)接受了低剂量普拉格雷治疗。低剂量普拉格雷在预防MACE方面显示出与氯吡格雷相当的有效性(HR:0.96,95%CI:0.72 - 1.29),并且没有增加出血风险(HR:0.82,95%CI:0.36 - 1.90),这与PRASFIT - ACS试验结果一致(HR:0.85,95%CI:0.62 - 1.16;HR:0.82,95%CI:0.39 - 1.73)。观察到心血管死亡率显著降低(HR:0.51,95%CI:0.29 - 0.89),这与PRASFIT - ACS试验结果不同(HR:1.21,95%CI:0.48 - 3.06)。我们的结果表明,低剂量普拉格雷在台湾人群中预防血栓形成事件有效,且不会显著增加出血风险。这些发现与关键试验结果一致,同时强调了针对特定种族进行剂量调整以优化ACS治疗策略的重要性。需要进一步研究以评估这些结果是否适用于其他东亚人群。