• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

K-ACTIVE注册研究:日本剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性心肌梗死患者的比较

A Japanese Dose of Prasugrel versus a Standard Dose of Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction from the K-ACTIVE Registry.

作者信息

Mori Hiroyoshi, Mizukami Takuya, Maeda Atsuo, Fukui Kazuki, Akashi Yoshihiro, Ako Junya, Ikari Yuji, Ebina Toshiaki, Tamura Kouichi, Namiki Atsuo, Michishita Ichiro, Kimura Kazuo, Suzuki Hiroshi

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama 227-8501, Japan.

Kanagawa Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center, Department of Cardiology, Yokohama 236-0051, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 4;11(7):2016. doi: 10.3390/jcm11072016.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11072016
PMID:35407624
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8999969/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus P2Y12 inhibitor is used as a standard therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) treated with drug-eluting stents (DESs). In Japan, clopidogrel was the major P2Y12 inhibitor used for a decade until the new P2Y12 inhibitor, prasugrel, was introduced. Based on clinical studies considering Japanese features, the set dose for prasugrel was reduced to 20 mg as a loading dose (LD) and 3.75 mg as a maintenance dose (MD); these values are 60 and 10 mg, respectively, globally. Despite this dose discrepancy, little real-world clinical data regarding its efficacy and safety exist.

METHODS

From the K-ACTIVE registry, based on the DAPT regimen, patients were divided into a prasugrel group and a clopidogrel group. The ischemic event was a composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, and non-fatal stroke. The bleeding event was type 3 or 5 bleeding based on the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria.

RESULTS

Substantially more patients were prescribed prasugrel ( = 2786) than clopidogrel ( = 890). Clopidogrel tended to be selected over prasugrel in older patients with numerous comorbidities. Before adjustments were made, the cumulative incidence of ischemic events at 1 year was significantly greater in the clopidogrel group than in the prasugrel group ( = 0.007), while the cumulative incidence of bleeding events at 1 year was comparable between the groups ( = 0.131). After adjustments were made for the age, sex, body weight, creatine level, type of AMI, history of MI, approach site, oral anticoagulation therapy, presence of multivessel disease, Killip classification, and presence of intra-aortic balloon pumping, both ischemic and bleeding events became comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSION

A Japanese dose of prasugrel was commonly used in AMI patients in the real-world database. Both the prasugrel and clopidogrel groups showed comparable rates of 1 year ischemic and bleeding events.

摘要

背景

阿司匹林联合P2Y12抑制剂的双重抗血小板治疗(DAPT)被用作接受药物洗脱支架(DES)治疗的急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者的标准治疗方法。在日本,在新型P2Y12抑制剂普拉格雷引入之前的十年间,氯吡格雷是主要使用的P2Y12抑制剂。基于考虑日本人群特征的临床研究,普拉格雷的设定剂量减至负荷剂量(LD)20mg和维持剂量(MD)3.75mg;而在全球范围内,这些数值分别为60mg和10mg。尽管存在这种剂量差异,但关于其疗效和安全性的真实世界临床数据却很少。

方法

从K-ACTIVE注册研究中,根据DAPT治疗方案,将患者分为普拉格雷组和氯吡格雷组。缺血事件是心血管死亡、非致命性心肌梗死和非致命性卒中的复合事件。出血事件根据出血学术研究联盟(BARC)标准为3型或5型出血。

结果

使用普拉格雷的患者(n = 2786)明显多于使用氯吡格雷的患者(n = 890)。在患有多种合并症的老年患者中,氯吡格雷的选用倾向高于普拉格雷。在进行调整之前,氯吡格雷组1年时缺血事件的累积发生率显著高于普拉格雷组(P = 0.007),而两组1年时出血事件的累积发生率相当(P = 0.131)。在对年龄、性别、体重、肌酐水平、AMI类型、心肌梗死病史、手术部位、口服抗凝治疗、多支血管病变的存在、Killip分级以及主动脉内球囊泵的使用情况进行调整后,两组间的缺血和出血事件发生率变得相当。

结论

在真实世界数据库中,日本剂量的普拉格雷常用于AMI患者。普拉格雷组和氯吡格雷组1年时的缺血和出血事件发生率相当。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd3b/8999969/37b81092a981/jcm-11-02016-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd3b/8999969/c98793494a28/jcm-11-02016-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd3b/8999969/37b81092a981/jcm-11-02016-g002a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd3b/8999969/c98793494a28/jcm-11-02016-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cd3b/8999969/37b81092a981/jcm-11-02016-g002a.jpg

相似文献

1
A Japanese Dose of Prasugrel versus a Standard Dose of Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction from the K-ACTIVE Registry.K-ACTIVE注册研究:日本剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷治疗急性心肌梗死患者的比较
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 4;11(7):2016. doi: 10.3390/jcm11072016.
2
Contemporary Antiplatelet Therapy and Clinical Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction - Results From the Prospective Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (JAMIR).当代抗血小板治疗与日本急性心肌梗死患者的临床结局 - 来自前瞻性日本急性心肌梗死注册研究(JAMIR)的结果。
Circ J. 2019 Jul 25;83(8):1633-1643. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0145. Epub 2019 Jun 14.
3
Ischemic and Bleeding Events Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Associated With Low-Dose Prasugrel vs Standard-Dose Clopidogrel Treatment.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中与低剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷治疗相关的缺血和出血事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202004. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2004.
4
Long versus short dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor and coronary revascularization: Insights from the RENAMI registry.接受普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中长程与短程双联抗血小板治疗与冠状动脉血运重建:来自 RENAMI 注册研究的结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 May;27(7):696-705. doi: 10.1177/2047487319836327. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
5
Elderly patients with acute coronary syndromes managed without revascularization: insights into the safety of long-term dual antiplatelet therapy with reduced-dose prasugrel versus standard-dose clopidogrel.未进行血运重建治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征老年患者:探讨长期应用小剂量普拉格雷双联抗血小板治疗与标准剂量氯吡格雷相比的安全性。
Circulation. 2013 Aug 20;128(8):823-33. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002303. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
6
Outcomes of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Receiving an Oral Anticoagulant and Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Comparison of Clopidogrel Versus Prasugrel From the TRANSLATE-ACS Study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性心肌梗死患者接受口服抗凝和双联抗血小板治疗的结果:来自 TRANSLATE-ACS 研究的氯吡格雷与普拉格雷比较。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec 21;8(14):1880-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.08.018.
7
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction Between Prasugrel and Clopidogrel.比较普拉格雷与氯吡格雷治疗急性心肌梗死的临床结局。
Int Heart J. 2021 May 29;62(3):479-486. doi: 10.1536/ihj.20-357. Epub 2021 May 15.
8
Optimizing P2Y12 receptor inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndrome on the basis of platelet function testing: impact of prasugrel and high-dose clopidogrel.基于血小板功能检测优化急性冠脉综合征患者的 P2Y12 受体抑制:普拉格雷和高剂量氯吡格雷的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Mar 25;63(11):1061-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.023. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
9
Safety of Prasugrel Loading Doses in Patients Pre-Loaded With Clopidogrel in the Setting of Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results of a Nonrandomized Observational Study.在直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中,患者预先使用氯吡格雷后给予普拉格雷负荷剂量的安全性:一项非随机观察性研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jul;8(8):1064-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.03.023.
10
Efficacy and Safety of Clopidogrel, Prasugrel and Ticagrelor in ACS Patients Treated with PCI: A Propensity Score Analysis of the RENAMI and BleeMACS Registries.经 PCI 治疗的 ACS 患者中氯吡格雷、普拉格雷和替格瑞洛的疗效和安全性:RENAME 和 BleeMACS 注册研究的倾向评分分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2020 Jun;20(3):259-269. doi: 10.1007/s40256-019-00373-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness and Safety of Reduced-Dose Prasugrel in an East Asian Population: PRASFIT-ACS Emulation Using National Health Insurance Claims Data.东亚人群中低剂量普拉格雷的有效性和安全性:利用国民健康保险理赔数据进行的PRASFIT-ACS模拟研究
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2025 Aug 4. doi: 10.1002/cpt.70017.
2
Third Generation P2Y Inhibition for East Asian ACS Patients: Are We Really Different?
JACC Asia. 2022 Nov 15;2(6):675-676. doi: 10.1016/j.jacasi.2022.09.006. eCollection 2022 Nov.
3
What More Can Be Delivered to Future Patients with Coronary Syndromes?对于未来的冠心病综合征患者,还能提供什么更多的治疗手段?

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of the safety and effectiveness of prasugrel and clopidogrel in younger population undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A retrospective study using a Japanese claims database.比较接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的年轻人群中普拉格雷和氯吡格雷的安全性和有效性:使用日本索赔数据库的回顾性研究。
J Cardiol. 2021 Mar;77(3):285-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Oct 21.
2
Temporal trends in coronary intervention strategies and the impact on one-year clinical events: data from a Japanese multi-center real-world cohort study.时间趋势在冠状动脉介入治疗策略和对一年临床事件的影响:来自日本多中心真实世界队列研究的数据。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022 Jan;37(1):66-77. doi: 10.1007/s12928-020-00752-5. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
3
J Clin Med. 2022 Sep 27;11(19):5704. doi: 10.3390/jcm11195704.
Acute thrombosis of everolimus-eluting platinum chromium stent caused by impaired prasugrel metabolism due to cytochrome P450 enzyme 2B6*2 (C64T) polymorphism: a case report.
细胞色素P450酶2B6*2(C64T)基因多态性导致普拉格雷代谢受损引起依维莫司洗脱铂铬支架急性血栓形成:一例报告
Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2020 Jul 25;4(4):1-7. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytaa137. eCollection 2020 Aug.
4
Risk of major adverse cardiovascular events of loss-of-function genotype guided prasugrel/ticagrelor vs clopidogrel therapy for acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis.指导普拉格雷/替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的功能丧失基因型与主要不良心血管事件风险:一项荟萃分析。
Platelets. 2021 Jul 4;32(5):591-600. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1792871. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
5
Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Oral P2Y Inhibitors in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Network Meta-Analysis of 52 816 Patients From 12 Randomized Trials.比较口服 P2Y 抑制剂在急性冠状动脉综合征中的疗效和安全性:来自 12 项随机试验的 52816 例患者的网络荟萃分析。
Circulation. 2020 Jul 14;142(2):150-160. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046786. Epub 2020 May 29.
6
Ischemic and Bleeding Events Among Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Associated With Low-Dose Prasugrel vs Standard-Dose Clopidogrel Treatment.急性冠状动脉综合征患者中与低剂量普拉格雷与标准剂量氯吡格雷治疗相关的缺血和出血事件。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e202004. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2004.
7
JCS 2020 Guideline Focused Update on Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.《日本循环学会(JCS)2020年冠状动脉疾病患者抗栓治疗指南重点更新》
Circ J. 2020 Apr 24;84(5):831-865. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-1109. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
8
Economic Evaluations of CYP2C19 Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy Compared to the Universal Use of Antiplatelets in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review.CYP2C19 基因指导的抗血小板治疗与急性冠状动脉综合征患者普遍使用抗血小板药物的经济学评价:系统评价。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2020 May;25(3):201-211. doi: 10.1177/1074248420902298. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
9
Impact of reduced-dose prasugrel vs. standard-dose clopidogrel on in-hospital outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in 62 737 patients with acute coronary syndromes: a nationwide registry study in Japan.在 62737 例急性冠脉综合征患者中,与标准剂量氯吡格雷相比,使用低剂量普拉格雷对经皮冠状动脉介入治疗住院结局的影响:一项日本全国注册研究。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020 Jul 1;6(4):231-238. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvz056.
10
Contemporary Antiplatelet Therapy and Clinical Outcomes of Japanese Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction - Results From the Prospective Japan Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (JAMIR).当代抗血小板治疗与日本急性心肌梗死患者的临床结局 - 来自前瞻性日本急性心肌梗死注册研究(JAMIR)的结果。
Circ J. 2019 Jul 25;83(8):1633-1643. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-19-0145. Epub 2019 Jun 14.