Suppr超能文献

美国普遍的免费学校膳食政策与参与国家学校膳食计划情况

Universal Free School Meal Policies and Participation in the US National School Meal Programs.

作者信息

Ramponi Francesco, Zhou Hui, Gosliner Wendi, Ohri-Vachaspati Punam, Orta-Aleman Dania, Ritchie Lorrene, Schwartz Marlene, Turner Lindsey, Verguet Stéphane, Cohen Juliana

机构信息

Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Nutrition Policy Institute, University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources, Oakland.

出版信息

JAMA Pediatr. 2025 Aug 4. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2025.2301.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

School meals can support children's health and educational outcomes; however, in the US, only students from households with incomes at or below 185% of the federal poverty level qualify for free or reduced-price meals. Although the Community Eligibility Provision (CEP) enables schools in higher poverty areas to offer free meals to all students, many schools do not participate; the temporary implementation of federal Universal Free School Meal (UFSM) policies during the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent state-level policies highlight the need for assessing their impact on participation rates in school meal programs.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the impact of federal- and state-level UFSM and related policies on National School Lunch Program (NSLP) and School Breakfast Program (SBP) participation rates during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This comparative effectiveness research study used a natural experiment created by the COVID-19 pandemic to analyze school-level data from the 2019 to 2020 school-year period to the 2023 to 2024 school-year period. A difference-in-difference analysis with linear mixed-effects models was conducted to assess the impact of federal-level UFSM implementation and deimplementation and state-level policies on SBP and NSLP participation rates. School-level meal claims data were analyzed across 14 states with UFSM or related policies and 11 comparison states, and schools participating in the NSLP and the SBP were included in this analysis.

EXPOSURES

Federal UFSM policy, state-level UFSM policies, CEP participation, and limited expansions of free meal access.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Participation rates in SBP and NSLP, measured as percentage-point changes over time.

RESULTS

Federal UFSM during the COVID-19 pandemic increased NSLP and SBP participation by 10 percentage points (range, -8 to 18 percentage points) and 8 percentage points (range, 2-20 percentage points), respectively, where percentage points refers to absolute changes in participation rates. Deimplementation in school year 2022 to 2023 reduced participation by 12 percentage points (range, -15 to -4 percentage points) for NSLP and 10 percentage points (range, -18 to -4 percentage points) for SBP. States that maintained UFSM policies showed consistently higher participation rates compared with states that discontinued UFSM, with increases between 9 and 19 percentage points (NSLP) and between 5 and 26 percentage points (SBP) in the first year of policy implementation, relative to the prior year. CEP participation resulted in substantial participation gains (23 percentage points for NSLP, 13 percentage points for SBP). State policies with limited free meal expansions showed no significant effect.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Results of this comparative research analysis suggest that UFSM policies may effectively increase school meal participation, indicating the need for sustained state and federal support to increase participation rates and potentially mitigate diet-related disparities and food insecurity among children.

摘要

重要性

学校膳食有助于儿童的健康和学业成绩;然而,在美国,只有家庭收入等于或低于联邦贫困线185%的学生才有资格享受免费或减价膳食。尽管社区资格条款(CEP)使高贫困地区的学校能够为所有学生提供免费膳食,但许多学校并未参与;在新冠疫情期间联邦普遍提供免费学校膳食(UFSM)政策的临时实施以及随后的州级政策凸显了评估其对学校膳食计划参与率影响的必要性。

目的

研究联邦和州级UFSM及相关政策在新冠疫情期间及之后对国家学校午餐计划(NSLP)和学校早餐计划(SBP)参与率的影响。

设计、背景和参与者:这项比较效果研究利用新冠疫情产生的自然实验,分析了2019至2020学年至2023至2024学年的学校层面数据。采用线性混合效应模型进行差异分析,以评估联邦层面UFSM的实施和取消以及州级政策对SBP和NSLP参与率的影响。对14个实施UFSM或相关政策的州以及11个对照州的学校层面膳食申领数据进行了分析,参与NSLP和SBP的学校纳入了本分析。

暴露因素

联邦UFSM政策、州级UFSM政策、CEP参与情况以及免费膳食获取的有限扩展。

主要结局和指标

SBP和NSLP的参与率,以随时间的百分点变化来衡量。

结果

新冠疫情期间的联邦UFSM使NSLP和SBP的参与率分别提高了10个百分点(范围为-8至18个百分点)和8个百分点(范围为2至20个百分点),百分点指参与率的绝对变化。2022至2023学年UFSM政策取消使NSLP参与率降低了12个百分点(范围为-15至-4个百分点),SBP参与率降低了10个百分点(范围为-18至-4个百分点)。与取消UFSM政策的州相比,维持UFSM政策的州参与率始终更高,在政策实施的第一年,NSLP参与率相对于上一年提高了9至19个百分点,SBP参与率提高了5至26个百分点。CEP参与带来了显著的参与率提升(NSLP为23个百分点,SBP为13个百分点)。免费膳食扩展有限的州级政策未显示出显著效果。

结论及意义

这项比较研究分析的结果表明,UFSM政策可能有效提高学校膳食参与率,这表明需要州和联邦持续提供支持,以提高参与率,并可能缓解儿童中与饮食相关的差异和粮食不安全问题。

相似文献

2
Measures implemented in the school setting to contain the COVID-19 pandemic.学校为控制 COVID-19 疫情而采取的措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 17;1(1):CD015029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015029.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验