Hahn Alexander K, Bauer Jordan A, Megalla Martinus, Grosso Matthew J
From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT (Hahn, Bauer, and Megalla), and the Connecticut Joint Replacement Institute, Hartford, CT (Grosso).
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025 Aug 4. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01502.
Dislocation is a known risk after total hip arthroplasty (THA), occurring in approximately 2% of cases. Although the posterolateral approach is the most commonly used approach to the hip, the disruption of posterior soft tissue is a concern for implant stability. The introduction of robotic assistance in arthroplasty has demonstrated improved implant positioning, although the effect on outcomes is still being assessed. The purpose of our study was to assess the 90-day dislocation rate between robotic-assisted and manual primary THA through the PL approach.
Data were collected from two board-certified adult reconstruction surgeons who performed THA through a PL approach from 2014 to 2023. These two surgeons had high-volume arthroplasty practices and transitioned from manual to robotic-assisted surgery within this period. Variables including patient demographic information, use of robotic assistance, total 90-day complications, and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score were collected and analyzed. Statistical analysis for numerical values was conducted using Student t-test and categorical variables with chi-square analysis, with alpha set at 0.05.
Two thousand five hundred forty-eight patients underwent a THA through the PL approach at our institution from 2014 to 2023. One thousand seven hundred twenty-seven patients had a manual THA, and 821 patients had a robotic-assisted THA. No significant difference was noted in total complication rates (n = 59, 3.4% vs. n = 18, 2.2%, P = 0.092) or dislocation rates (n = 7, 0.4% vs. n = 3, 0.4%, P = 0.88) between the manual and robotic-assisted groups, respectively. No statistical difference was found in the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score at any of the postoperative time points. Total surgical time was markedly longer for the robotic-assisted group (88 minutes) compared with the manual group (74 minutes).
This study demonstrated no notable difference in 90-day dislocation rates for high-volume arthroplasty-trained surgeons when comparing manual versus robotic-assisted THA when using the PL approach.
脱位是全髋关节置换术(THA)后已知的风险,发生率约为2%。尽管后外侧入路是髋关节最常用的入路,但后软组织的破坏是植入物稳定性的一个问题。关节置换术中引入机器人辅助已显示出改善了植入物的定位,尽管其对结果的影响仍在评估中。我们研究的目的是通过后外侧(PL)入路评估机器人辅助与手动初次全髋关节置换术之间的90天脱位率。
收集了两位获得委员会认证的成人重建外科医生的数据,他们在2014年至2023年期间通过PL入路进行全髋关节置换术。这两位外科医生进行了大量的关节置换手术,并在此期间从手动手术过渡到机器人辅助手术。收集并分析了包括患者人口统计学信息、机器人辅助的使用、90天内的总并发症以及髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结果评分等变量。对数值进行统计分析时使用学生t检验,对分类变量使用卡方分析,显著性水平设定为0.05。
2014年至2023年期间,我院有2548例患者通过PL入路接受了全髋关节置换术。其中1727例患者接受了手动全髋关节置换术,821例患者接受了机器人辅助全髋关节置换术。手动组和机器人辅助组的总并发症发生率(n = 59,3.4% 对 n = 18,2.2%,P = 0.092)或脱位率(n = 7,0.4% 对 n = 3,0.4%,P = 0.88)均无显著差异。在任何术后时间点,髋关节残疾和骨关节炎结果评分均无统计学差异。与手动组(74分钟)相比,机器人辅助组的总手术时间明显更长(88分钟)。
本研究表明,对于接受大量关节置换手术培训的外科医生,在使用PL入路比较手动与机器人辅助全髋关节置换术时,90天脱位率没有显著差异。