Division of Population Health and Genomics, University of Dundee, UK.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Centre for Guidelines, Manchester, UK.
BMJ. 2023 Mar 22;380:e072098. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-072098.
To determine whether the withdrawal of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) scheme in primary care in Scotland in 2016 had an impact on selected recorded quality of care, compared with England where the scheme continued.
Controlled interrupted time series regression analysis.
General practices in Scotland and England.
979 practices with 5 599 171 registered patients in Scotland, and 7921 practices with 56 270 628 registered patients in England in 2013-14, decreasing to 864 practices in Scotland and 6873 in England in 2018-19, mainly due to practice mergers.
Changes in quality of care at one year and three years after withdrawal of QOF financial incentives in Scotland at the end of the 2015-16 financial year for 16 indicators (two complex processes, nine intermediate outcomes, and five treatments) measured annually for financial years from 2013-14 to 2018-19.
A significant decrease in performance was observed for 12 of the 16 quality of care indicators in Scotland one year after QOF was abolished and for 10 of the 16 indicators three years after QOF was abolished, compared with England. At three years, the absolute percentage point difference between Scotland and England was largest for recording (by tick box) of mental health care planning (-40.2 percentage points, 95% confidence interval -45.5 to -35.0) and diabetic foot screening (-22.8, -33.9 to -11.7). Substantial reductions were, however, also observed for intermediate outcomes, including blood pressure control in patients with peripheral arterial disease (-18.5, -22.1 to -14.9), stroke or transient ischaemic attack (-16.6, -20.6 to -12.7), hypertension (-13.7, -19.4 to -7.9), diabetes (-12.7, -15.0 to -12.4), or coronary heart disease (-12.8, -14.9 to -10.8), and for glycated haemoglobin control in people with HbA levels ≤75 mmol/mol (-5.0, -8.4 to -1.5). No significant differences were observed between Scotland and England for influenza immunisation and antiplatelet or anticoagulant treatment for coronary heart disease three years after withdrawal of incentives.
The abolition of financial incentives in Scotland was associated with reductions in recorded quality of care for most performance indicators. Changes to pay for performance should be carefully designed and implemented to monitor and respond to any reductions in care quality.
比较 2016 年苏格兰停止初级保健质量和结果框架(QOF)计划与英格兰继续该计划的情况下,选定的记录护理质量的变化。
对照中断时间序列回归分析。
苏格兰和英格兰的全科诊所。
2013-14 年苏格兰有 979 家诊所和 5599171 名注册患者,英格兰有 7921 家诊所和 56270628 名注册患者,2018-19 年减少到苏格兰 864 家诊所和英格兰 6873 家诊所,主要是由于诊所合并。
2015-16 财年末苏格兰取消 QOF 财务激励措施一年和三年后,2013-14 财年至 2018-19 财年每年测量的 16 项质量指标(两项复杂流程、九项中间结果和五项治疗)的护理质量变化。
在苏格兰取消 QOF 一年后,16 项护理质量指标中有 12 项的表现显著下降,取消 QOF 三年后,有 10 项指标的表现显著下降,与英格兰相比。三年后,苏格兰和英格兰之间的绝对百分点差异最大的是心理健康护理计划的记录(通过勾选框)(-40.2 个百分点,95%置信区间-45.5 至-35.0)和糖尿病足筛查(-22.8,-33.9 至-11.7)。然而,中间结果也有大幅下降,包括外周动脉疾病患者的血压控制(-18.5,-22.1 至-14.9)、中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(-16.6,-20.6 至-12.7)、高血压(-13.7,-19.4 至-7.9)、糖尿病(-12.7,-15.0 至-12.4)或冠心病(-12.8,-14.9 至-10.8),以及糖化血红蛋白控制在 HbA 水平≤75 mmol/mol 的人群中(-5.0,-8.4 至-1.5)。取消激励措施三年后,苏格兰和英格兰之间在流感免疫接种和抗血小板或抗凝治疗冠心病方面没有显著差异。
苏格兰取消财务激励措施与大多数绩效指标的记录护理质量下降有关。应该仔细设计和实施绩效支付的变化,以监测和应对任何护理质量的下降。