Okdahl Tina, Wegeberg Anne-Marie, Jensen Marie Møller, Quist Jonas Salling, Brock Christina
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mech-Sense, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
Thisted Research Unit, Aalborg University Hospital Thisted, Thisted, Denmark.
Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025 Aug 4;17(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s13098-025-01834-1.
Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is a life-threatening complication associated with diabetes but may also be present without diabetes. A glycaemic threshold for autonomic impairment is not yet established. The purpose of this study was to compare CAN status in people with and without diabetes and to investigate which factors contributed the most to the presence and severity of CAN.
We included 240 participants from three different cohorts: non-diabetic people (n = 40), people with overweight or obesity with or without prediabetes (n = 100), and people with type 2 diabetes (n = 100). All participants underwent cardiovascular autonomic reflex tests using the Vagus™ device, and clinical variables, including age, sex, body mass index, blood pressure, HbA1c, blood lipid profile, and cardiovascular risk score, were recorded.
In total, 14% without and 42% with diabetes had CAN. HbA1c had the most significant influence on CAN scores, with a cutpoint of 45.5 mmol/l corresponding to established prediabetes (sensitivity: 0.66; specificity: 0.71). In people with HbA1c levels below the cutpoint, those with CAN had lower levels of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) (1.1 vs. 1.4 mmol/mol, p = 0.003) and higher cardiovascular risk scores (p < 0.001) compared to people without CAN. No differences in any of the investigated clinical factors were seen between people with HbA1c levels above the cutpoint with or without CAN.
In individuals with HbA1c levels below 45.5 mmol/l, both HDL levels and cardiovascular risk score were associated with CAN status. Therefore, it may be beneficial to screen for CAN in individuals susceptible to prediabetes, who also exhibit low HDL levels and a high cardiovascular risk.
心血管自主神经病变(CAN)是一种与糖尿病相关的危及生命的并发症,但也可能在无糖尿病的情况下出现。自主神经功能损害的血糖阈值尚未确定。本研究的目的是比较糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的CAN状况,并调查哪些因素对CAN的存在和严重程度影响最大。
我们纳入了来自三个不同队列的240名参与者:非糖尿病患者(n = 40)、有或无糖尿病前期的超重或肥胖患者(n = 100)以及2型糖尿病患者(n = 100)。所有参与者均使用Vagus™设备进行心血管自主神经反射测试,并记录临床变量,包括年龄、性别、体重指数、血压、糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、血脂谱和心血管风险评分。
总体而言,无糖尿病患者中14%患有CAN,糖尿病患者中42%患有CAN。HbA1c对CAN评分影响最为显著,切点为45.5 mmol/l,对应已确定的糖尿病前期(敏感性:0.66;特异性:0.71)。在HbA1c水平低于切点的人群中,与无CAN的人相比,患有CAN的人高密度脂蛋白(HDL)水平较低(1.1 vs. 1.4 mmol/mol,p = 0.003),心血管风险评分较高(p < 0.001)。HbA1c水平高于切点的人群中,有或无CAN的人在任何调查的临床因素上均无差异。
在HbA1c水平低于45.5 mmol/l的个体中,HDL水平和心血管风险评分均与CAN状况相关。因此,对易患糖尿病前期且HDL水平低、心血管风险高的个体进行CAN筛查可能有益。