Zhang Guorui, Jin Chengji
School of Physical Education, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.
Sci Prog. 2025 Jul-Sep;108(3):368504251366367. doi: 10.1177/00368504251366367. Epub 2025 Aug 4.
ObjectivesThis study aimed to develop and validate the family sports ecosystem questionnaire (FSEQ), a novel instrument measuring the family sports ecosystem construct for junior high school students, defined as a dynamic network comprising family sports environment, family physical education, and individual sports consciousness.DesignA methodological cross-sectional study was conducted, employing a multi-phase questionnaire development and validation design: (1) initial item compilation based on theory and literature, (2) content/face validity assessment via expert consultation (three rounds, = 23 experts), (3) preliminary survey, and (4) psychometric evaluation using split-sample methodology ( = 1344 students, randomly split into = 672 for exploratory factor analysis (EFA)/item analysis and = 672 for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA)).MethodsThe initial items were determined in the form of expert scoring and interviews. Internal consistency assessed via Cronbach's alpha and corrected item total correlation. The construct validity of the questionnaire was verified by EFA and CFA. Model fit indices assessed (e.g. χ²/df, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), comparative fit index (CFI), and Tucker-Lewis index (TLI)). The convergent validity of the questionnaire was evaluated by factor load, average variance extracted (AVE), and composite reliability (CR). The Fornell-Larcker criterion was used to evaluate discriminant validity.ResultsThe final FSEQ comprised 33 items across nine factors nested within three dimensions: family sports environment (ball/leisure facilities, swimming/winter facilities, and home electronic devices), family physical education (parental support, role modeling, and sports knowledge instruction), and individual sports consciousness (cognitive identification, emotional attitude, and will/intention). Content validity: Achieved consensus after expert revisions. Reliability: Excellent internal consistency (overall Cronbach's α = 0.943; sub-dimensions α = 0.740 to 0.942). Structural validity: EFA explained 69.543% variance; CFA demonstrated excellent fit (χ²/df = 1.538, RMSEA = 0.028, CFI = 0.979, and TLI = 0.975). Convergent validity: All factor loadings > 0.6, AVE > 0.5, and CR > 0.7. Discriminant validity: Satisfied Fornell-Larcker criterion for all latent variables.ConclusionThe present study established a comprehensive family sports ecosystem and subsequently developed the "FSEQ" for the first time.
目标
本研究旨在开发并验证家庭体育生态系统问卷(FSEQ),这是一种用于测量初中生家庭体育生态系统结构的新型工具,该结构被定义为一个由家庭体育环境、家庭体育教育和个人体育意识组成的动态网络。
设计
进行了一项方法学横断面研究,采用多阶段问卷开发和验证设计:(1)基于理论和文献初步编制项目;(2)通过专家咨询(三轮,n = 23名专家)进行内容/表面效度评估;(3)初步调查;(4)使用分割样本方法进行心理测量评估(n = 1344名学生,随机分为n = 672名用于探索性因素分析(EFA)/项目分析,n = 672名用于验证性因素分析(CFA))。
方法
初始项目以专家评分和访谈的形式确定。通过Cronbach's alpha和校正的项目总相关性评估内部一致性。问卷的结构效度通过EFA和CFA进行验证。评估模型拟合指数(例如χ²/df、近似均方根误差(RMSEA)、比较拟合指数(CFI)和塔克 - 刘易斯指数(TLI))。通过因素负荷、平均方差抽取(AVE)和组合信度(CR)评估问卷的收敛效度。使用Fornell - Larcker准则评估区分效度。
结果
最终的FSEQ包括33个项目,分为九个因素,嵌套在三个维度中:家庭体育环境(球类/休闲设施、游泳/冬季设施和家用电子设备)、家庭体育教育(父母支持、榜样作用和体育知识指导)和个人体育意识(认知认同、情感态度和意志/意图)。内容效度:专家修订后达成共识。信度:具有出色的内部一致性(总体Cronbach's α = 0.943;子维度α = 0.740至0.942)。结构效度:EFA解释了69.543%的方差;CFA显示出出色的拟合度(χ²/df = 1.538,RMSEA = 0.028,CFI = 0.979,TLI = 0.975)。收敛效度:所有因素负荷> 0.6,AVE> 0.5,CR> 0.7。区分效度:所有潜在变量均满足Fornell - Larcker准则。
结论
本研究首次建立了一个全面的家庭体育生态系统,并随后开发了“FSEQ”。