• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

iHOT-12项目分析:各项目与不同时间点内及跨时间点的总分之间的相关性。

iHOT-12 item analysis: correlations between individual items and overall score within and across time points.

作者信息

Yuro Matthew, Martin Robroy, Wolff Andrew B, Nho Shane, Wuerz Thomas, Thiel Geoff Van, Christoforetti John, Salvo John P, Matsuda Dean, Carreira Dominic S

机构信息

Peachtree Orthopedics, 3200 Downwood Circle NW #700, Atlanta, GA 30327, United States.

Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Ave, Pittsburgh, PA 15282, United States.

出版信息

J Hip Preserv Surg. 2025 Feb 20;12(2):118-124. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnaf004. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.1093/jhps/hnaf004
PMID:40761573
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12318926/
Abstract

The main aim of this study was to analyze correlations between individual international hip outcome tool 12 (iHOT-12) items and overall iHOT-12 score within and across timepoints. A retrospective multicenter hip arthroscopy registry was queried for patients from January 2014 to October 2023 with completed iHOT-12 reports. Pearson coefficient analysis was used to identify correlations between individual iHOT-12 items and overall iHOT-12 score at each timepoint and between preoperative individual iHOT-12 items and postoperative overall iHOT-12 scores. Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the iHOT-12 were analyzed at each timepoint. Within timepoints, correlations ranged in strength from fair (preoperative maintain fitness level,  = 0.52,  < .00001) to excellent (5-year hip pain after activity,  = 0.93,  < .00001). Correlations increased in strength over time. Across timepoints, correlations ranged in strength from no correlation (2-year maintain fitness level,  = -0.001,  = 0.94) to poor (6-month pushing or lifting heavy objects,  = 0.31,  < .00001). Correlations decreased in strength over time. No ceiling or floor effects were exhibited. The Cronbach alpha for the baseline, 6-month, 1-year, 2-year, and 5-year timepoints were 0.87, 0.96, 0.95, 0.96, and 0.97, respectively. Cohen's values at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years were 1.19, 1.43, 1.71, and 1.58, respectively. Within timepoints, hip pain after activity had the strongest correlations to overall iHOT-12 score. Across timepoints, correlations between preoperative individual iHOT-12 items and postoperative overall iHOT-12 score were poor and weakened over time, suggesting similar long-term postoperative iHOT-12 scores among both high- and low-scoring preoperative patients. The iHOT-12 demonstrated good validity, reliability, and responsiveness at all timepoints.

摘要

本研究的主要目的是分析国际髋关节结果工具12项(iHOT - 12)各条目与不同时间点及跨时间点的iHOT - 12总分之间的相关性。对2014年1月至2023年10月期间完成iHOT - 12报告的患者的回顾性多中心髋关节镜登记资料进行查询。采用Pearson系数分析来确定每个时间点iHOT - 12各条目与iHOT - 12总分之间以及术前iHOT - 12各条目与术后iHOT - 12总分之间的相关性。在每个时间点分析iHOT - 12的效度、信度和反应度。在各时间点内,相关性强度范围从中等(术前维持健康水平,r = 0.52,p <.00001)到极好(活动后5年髋关节疼痛,r = 0.93,p <.00001)。相关性强度随时间增加。跨时间点,相关性强度范围从无相关性(2年维持健康水平,r = -0.001,p = 0.94)到较差(6个月推或提重物,r = 0.31,p <.00001)。相关性强度随时间降低。未表现出天花板效应或地板效应。基线、6个月、1年、2年和5年时间点的Cronbach α系数分别为0.87、0.96、0.95、0.96和0.97。6个月、1年、2年和5年时的Cohen's d值分别为1.19、1.43、1.71和1.58。在各时间点内,活动后髋关节疼痛与iHOT - 12总分的相关性最强。跨时间点,术前iHOT - 12各条目与术后iHOT - 12总分之间的相关性较差且随时间减弱,提示术前高分和低分患者术后长期iHOT - 12评分相似。iHOT - 12在所有时间点均表现出良好的效度、信度和反应度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b08/12318926/397c89d6c5d8/hnaf004f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b08/12318926/31fd148c7c5a/hnaf004f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b08/12318926/397c89d6c5d8/hnaf004f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b08/12318926/31fd148c7c5a/hnaf004f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4b08/12318926/397c89d6c5d8/hnaf004f2.jpg

相似文献

1
iHOT-12 item analysis: correlations between individual items and overall score within and across time points.iHOT-12项目分析:各项目与不同时间点内及跨时间点的总分之间的相关性。
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2025 Feb 20;12(2):118-124. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnaf004. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Is Prior Nonoperative or Operative Treatment of Dysplasia of the Hip Associated With Poorer Results of Periacetabular Osteotomy?髋关节发育不良的术前或术后治疗是否与髋臼周围截骨术的结果较差相关?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Nov 1;482(11):1987-1996. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003150. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
3
Surgical Hip Dislocation in the Era of Hip Arthroscopy Demonstrates High Survivorship and Improvements in Patient-reported Outcomes for Complex Femoroacetabular Impingement.关节镜时代的髋关节脱位手术具有高存活率,并改善了复杂型股骨髋臼撞击症患者的报告结局。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1671-1682. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003032. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
4
What Are the Minimum Clinically Important Difference, Substantial Clinical Benefit, and Patient-Acceptable Symptom State Thresholds for the Modified Harris Hip Score and International Hip Outcome Tool 12 Among Patients Who Undergo Periacetabular Osteotomy?对于接受髋臼周围截骨术的患者,改良Harris髋关节评分和国际髋关节结果工具12的最小临床重要差异、显著临床益处及患者可接受的症状状态阈值分别是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Feb 12. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003393.
5
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
6
Is It Possible to Develop a Patient-reported Experience Measure With Lower Ceiling Effect?是否有可能开发一种天花板效应较低的患者报告体验测量方法?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):693-703. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003262. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
7
Contralateral THAs More Than 1 Year Apart: Do PROMs and Healthcare Utilization Differ After Each Procedure?间隔超过1年的对侧全髋关节置换术:每次手术后患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)和医疗资源利用情况是否存在差异?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 May 1;483(5):832-842. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003339. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
8
Change in Early Patient-Reported Sexual Function After Periacetabular Osteotomy: A Study Utilizing the UK Non-Arthroplasty Hip Registry.髋臼周围截骨术后早期患者报告的性功能变化:一项利用英国非关节置换髋关节登记处的研究。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 25;13(6):23259671251341475. doi: 10.1177/23259671251341475. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome and Labral Tears in Competitive Soccer Players Shows Significant Functional Improvement and High Return-to-Sport Rates at Mid-Term Follow-Up.髋关节镜手术治疗竞技足球运动员的股骨髋臼撞击综合征和盂唇撕裂在中期随访时显示出显著的功能改善和高重返运动率。
Arthroscopy. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.012.
10
How Does Shame Relate to Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes in Knee Osteoarthritis?羞耻感与膝关节骨关节炎的临床及心理社会结局有何关联?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):558-570. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003329. Epub 2024 Dec 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-cultural adaptation, validation and psychometric evaluation of the International Hip Outcome Tool 12 (iHOT) to Hebrew.国际髋关节结果工具 12 (iHOT)希伯来语版的跨文化调适、验证和心理计量评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2023 Nov 21;21(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12955-023-02203-0.
2
Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of the Spanish Version of the International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12Sv).国际髋关节疗效工具西班牙语版(iHOT-12Sv)的效度及重测信度
J Clin Med. 2022 Oct 22;11(21):6232. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216232.
3
Are the Harris Hip Score and the Hip Outcome Score valid patient-reported outcome measures for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome?
哈里斯髋关节评分和髋关节结局评分是否可作为髋关节撞击综合征的有效患者报告结局测量指标?
Braz J Phys Ther. 2022 Jul-Aug;26(4):100422. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2022.100422. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
4
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Test Is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.患者报告结局测量信息系统测试在接受关节镜检查治疗股骨髋臼撞击综合征的患者中,其反应性低于传统的特定髋关节患者报告结局指标。
Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2021 Aug 27;3(6):e1645-e1650. doi: 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.07.020. eCollection 2021 Dec.
5
Validation of the French version of the Self-Administered International Hip Outcome Tool-12 Questionnaire and determination of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference (MCID) in the French speaking population.验证法语版自我管理国际髋关节结局工具 12 问卷,并确定法语人群中的最小临床重要差异 (MCID)。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021 Dec;107(8):103083. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.103083. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
6
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Clinically Important Outcome Values in Hip Arthroscopy: A Systematic Review.髋关节镜检查中患者报告的结局指标及具有临床意义的结局值:一项系统评价
JBJS Rev. 2021 Jan 26;9(1):e20.00084. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00084.
7
Does failure to meet threshold scores for mHHS and iHOT-12 correlate to secondary operations following hip arthroscopy?髋关节镜检查后,未能达到改良 Harris 髋关节评分(mHHS)和国际髋关节结果评分-12 项(iHOT-12)的阈值分数是否与二次手术相关?
J Hip Preserv Surg. 2020 Apr 14;7(2):272-280. doi: 10.1093/jhps/hnaa015. eCollection 2020 Jul.
8
Refining clinical trial inclusion criteria to optimize the standardized response mean of the CMTPedS.优化 CMTPedS 的标准化反应均值,细化临床试验纳入标准。
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2020 Sep;7(9):1713-1715. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51145. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
Responsiveness and ceiling effects of the English version of the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool following hip arthroscopy at minimum one-year follow-up.髋关节镜术后至少 1 年随访时,12 项国际髋关节结局工具英文版的反应度和天花板效应。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Aug;102-B(8):1010-1015. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B8.BJJ-2020-0074.R1.
10
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function Has a Lower Effect Size and is Less Responsive Than Legacy Hip Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measures Following Arthroscopic Hip Surgery.患者报告结局测量信息系统的身体功能在关节镜下髋关节手术后,与传统的特定髋关节患者报告结局测量指标相比,效应量更低且反应性更差。
Arthroscopy. 2020 Dec;36(12):2992-2997. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Jul 14.