Sahnon Abaker Sahnon Abdelrahman, Taha Mawada, Osman Yousif, Ibrahim Abdelrahman, Ibrahim Ahmed S, Mahdi Ahmed, H J Alkhazendar Jarallah, Alkhazendar Aliaa H, Mohamed Ahmed, Mushtaq Shafaq
General Practice, Speedy Recovery Clinic, Jeddah, SAU.
General Surgery, National Ribat University, Khartoum, SDN.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 4;17(7):e87262. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87262. eCollection 2025 Jul.
This systematic review explores the impact of internal medicine co-management on surgical outcomes and timing in adult patients across various surgical specialties, with an emphasis on trauma care. A comprehensive literature search identified five eligible studies comprising over 60,000 patients. Co-management models included hospitalist-led, advanced practice clinician-led, and multidisciplinary approaches. The outcomes consistently showed reductions in complications, hospital length of stay, rapid response team activations, and 30-day mortality. One study also highlighted indirect timing benefits, such as reduced intensive care unit (ICU) stay and ventilation days, with earlier surgical intervention. Although the evidence base is limited by study heterogeneity and lack of randomized trials, the consistent positive trends suggest that structured co-management enhances perioperative safety and system efficiency. These findings support broader implementation of co-management models, particularly in high-risk surgical and trauma populations, and underscore the need for further prospective research targeting surgical timing and interdisciplinary coordination.
本系统评价探讨了内科共同管理对各外科专科成年患者手术结局和手术时机的影响,重点关注创伤护理。全面的文献检索确定了五项符合条件的研究,涉及超过60000名患者。共同管理模式包括由住院医师主导、高级实践临床医生主导和多学科方法。结果一致显示并发症、住院时间、快速反应团队启动次数和30天死亡率均有所降低。一项研究还强调了间接的时机效益,如缩短重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和通气天数,同时手术干预更早。尽管证据基础受到研究异质性和缺乏随机试验的限制,但一致的积极趋势表明,结构化的共同管理可提高围手术期安全性和系统效率。这些发现支持更广泛地实施共同管理模式,尤其是在高风险手术和创伤人群中,并强调需要针对手术时机和跨学科协调进行进一步的前瞻性研究。