Suppr超能文献

血管内碎石术治疗钙化性颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉支架置入术:一项系统文献综述

Carotid artery stenting with intravascular lithotripsy for calcific carotid stenosis: A systematic literature review.

作者信息

Evans Alexander R, Reid Adaira R, Kharbat Abdurrahman F, Gumerlock Mary K, Shakir Hakeem J

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, USA.

出版信息

J Int Med Res. 2025 Aug;53(8):3000605251343871. doi: 10.1177/03000605251343871. Epub 2025 Aug 5.

Abstract

BackgroundEndovascular techniques such as stenting, endarterectomy, and transcarotid arterial revascularization are common therapeutic options in the management of carotid artery stenosis; however, they involve a risk of major complications (e.g. in-hospital transient ischemic attack or ischemic stroke). The application of shock wave therapy in the form of intravascular lithotripsy has been increasingly explored among patients with calcified arterial lesions. To the best of our knowledge, the diverse applications of intravascular lithotripsy have been documented in the context of peripheral artery disease, coronary artery disease, and transcarotid arterial revascularization; however, limited research has been conducted on other domains of endovascular management. In this systematic review, we aimed to elucidate the complication profile and document the safety of off-label intravascular lithotripsy prior to carotid artery stenting for calcific carotid artery stenosis.MethodsA systematic literature review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, in which the databases of PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Scopus were searched to identify all cases of reported carotid artery stenosis treated with intravascular lithotripsy in conjunction with carotid artery stenting.ResultsOf the 711 initially identified articles, 7 were selected because they met the study criteria. Finally, 11 patients aged 56-82 years were included in our review. The prevalence of preoperative stenosis ranged from 60% to 95%; postoperative vessel patency was described in all cases. In the postoperative period, one patient experienced transient right eye blindness secondary to central retinal artery occlusion and another patient sustained a left hemispheric transient ischemic attack.ConclusionWe explored the application of intravascular lithotripsy in carotid artery stenting procedures, in which success in improving lumen patency has been documented. Although postoperative complications such as transient ischemic attack have been reported, all patients exhibited good clinical outcomes, with no new permanent deficits being observed. Our findings cautiously recommend the use of intravascular lithotripsy as an adjunct to carotid artery stenting in the management of calcific carotid stenosis as a safe therapeutic option in selected patients. However, further research on this subject is warranted.

摘要

背景

血管内技术,如支架置入术、动脉内膜切除术和经颈动脉血管重建术,是治疗颈动脉狭窄的常见选择;然而,它们存在重大并发症的风险(如院内短暂性脑缺血发作或缺血性中风)。血管内冲击波碎石术形式的冲击波疗法在患有钙化动脉病变的患者中得到了越来越多的探索。据我们所知,血管内碎石术在周围动脉疾病、冠状动脉疾病和经颈动脉血管重建术的背景下有多种应用记录;然而,关于血管内治疗其他领域的研究有限。在本系统评价中,我们旨在阐明并发症情况,并记录在钙化性颈动脉狭窄的颈动脉支架置入术前进行非标签血管内碎石术的安全性。

方法

根据《系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目2020》指南进行系统文献综述,检索PubMed、CINAHL、Embase和Scopus数据库,以识别所有报告的采用血管内碎石术联合颈动脉支架置入术治疗颈动脉狭窄的病例。

结果

在最初识别的711篇文章中,7篇因符合研究标准而被选中。最后,11名年龄在56 - 82岁的患者被纳入我们的综述。术前狭窄率在60%至95%之间;所有病例均描述了术后血管通畅情况。术后,一名患者因视网膜中央动脉阻塞继发短暂性右眼失明,另一名患者发生左半球短暂性脑缺血发作。

结论

我们探讨了血管内碎石术在颈动脉支架置入术中的应用,其中已记录到在改善管腔通畅方面取得了成功。虽然已报告术后出现短暂性脑缺血发作等并发症,但所有患者均表现出良好的临床结局,未观察到新的永久性缺陷。我们的研究结果谨慎推荐在钙化性颈动脉狭窄的管理中,将血管内碎石术作为颈动脉支架置入术的辅助手段,作为特定患者的一种安全治疗选择。然而,对此主题有必要进行进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0d0/12326122/826adacb10ab/10.1177_03000605251343871-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验