Guo Lizhi, Zhou Yajing, Lu Hanna, Fung Helene H
Department of Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong.
Department of Forensic & Neurodevelopmental Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Neurobiol Aging. 2025 Jul 30;156:10-29. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2025.07.016.
This systematic review aims to investigate the moderating effects of cognitive reserve (CR) on the relationships between cognitive function and multimodal Alzheimer's disease (AD)-signatured brain changes, measured by positron emission tomography (PET), structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI) and functional MRI (fMRI). Through a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, we identified 55 eligible studies examining the moderating effect of CR on the relationship between neuroimaging biomarkers and cognitive outcomes. CR measurements include sociobehavioral proxies (e.g., education, leisure activities), residual approaches, and functional imaging approaches. Findings were mixed. Of the fifty-five studies, 41 studies reported a protective effect of CR, suggesting its buffering effect against cognitive decline or AD progression during ageing. However, eleven studies reported no interaction between CR and neuroimaging biomarkers. Six studies suggested a detrimental effect of CR in the middle-to-late stages of the disease [e.g., mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD] (three studies reported both protective and detrimental effects). The discrepancies may reflect that the influence of CR on the association between neuroimaging biomarkers and cognitive function depends on disease stage. In early stages, it exhibits protective effects, but as pathology accumulates, it may accelerate cognitive decline. This review revealed CR has heterogeneous effects on AD progression. We preliminarily identified a "critical point" for CR within the continuum between cognitively unimpaired (CU) and MCI, although its precise pathological determinants require further clarification. Establishing standardized CR metrics and conducting longitudinal biomarker-integrated studies are critical to pinpoint optimal intervention windows for maximizing CR's protective effects.
本系统评价旨在研究认知储备(CR)对认知功能与多模态阿尔茨海默病(AD)特征性脑变化之间关系的调节作用,这些脑变化通过正电子发射断层扫描(PET)、结构磁共振成像(sMRI)和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)进行测量。通过全面检索PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science,我们确定了55项符合条件的研究,这些研究考察了CR对神经影像学生物标志物与认知结果之间关系的调节作用。CR的测量包括社会行为指标(如教育程度、休闲活动)、残差法和功能成像法。研究结果不一。在这55项研究中,41项研究报告了CR的保护作用,表明其在衰老过程中对认知衰退或AD进展具有缓冲作用。然而,11项研究报告CR与神经影像学生物标志物之间没有相互作用。6项研究表明CR在疾病中晚期[如轻度认知障碍(MCI)和AD]具有有害作用(3项研究报告了保护作用和有害作用)。这些差异可能反映出CR对神经影像学生物标志物与认知功能之间关联的影响取决于疾病阶段。在早期阶段,它表现出保护作用,但随着病理学积累,它可能会加速认知衰退。本综述揭示CR对AD进展具有异质性影响。我们初步确定了在认知未受损(CU)和MCI之间的连续体中CR的一个“临界点”,尽管其确切的病理决定因素需要进一步阐明。建立标准化的CR指标并进行纵向生物标志物综合研究对于确定最佳干预窗口以最大化CR的保护作用至关重要。