• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HEp-2细胞间接免疫荧光中细胞质离散点(AC-18)模式的临床意义:来自台湾多中心研究的见解

Clinical significance of cytoplasmic discrete dots (AC-18) patterns in HEp-2 cell indirect Immunofluorescence: insights from a Taiwanese multicenter study.

作者信息

Hsiao Chao-Yang, Su Li-Jen, Yu Kuang-Hui, Chan Tien-Ming

机构信息

Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Department of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, National Central University, Taiwan.

Department of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, National Central University, Taiwan.

出版信息

Clin Chim Acta. 2026 Jan 1;578:120521. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2025.120521. Epub 2025 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2025.120521
PMID:40763822
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The clinical significance of autoantibodies with the cytoplasmic discrete dots pattern in HEp-2 cell indirect immunofluorescence assay (HEp-2 IFA), now classified as the anti-cell 18 (AC-18) pattern by International Consensus on Antinuclear Antibodies Patterns (ICAP), varies across cohorts, and remained underexplored.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study on patients who underwent antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing via HEp-2 IFA at the Chang Gung Memorial Health System in Taiwan between January 2019 and September 2021. Among 7429 ANA-positive cases, 77 exhibited the AC-18 pattern and underwent chart review. A propensity score (PS) matching analysis was subsequently conducted, in which 53 patients exhibiting an isolated AC-18 pattern were matched to 265 control subjects, selected from a pool of 31,143 ANA-negative individuals at a 1:5 ratio. Matching was based on age, sex, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Among the 77 patients positive for AC-18 pattern, 14.3% had Sjögren disease (SjD), 11.7% had rheumatoid arthritis (RA), 5.2% had idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), and 3.9% had systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Specifically, 29.9% had various types of cancer. In PS matching model, the prevalence of SjD, IIM and cancer was significantly higher in patients with the AC-18 pattern compared to the control group, with odds ratios (OR) of 16.8 (95% CI 3.3, 85.7), 7.9 (95% CI 1.3, 48.4), and 4.8 (95% CI 2.3, 10.3), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with a positive ANA test showing the AC-18 pattern have a notably higher prevalence of cancer and autoimmune diseases compared to those with negative ANA results.

摘要

引言

在人喉表皮样癌细胞(HEp-2)间接免疫荧光法(HEp-2 IFA)中呈现胞质离散点状模式的自身抗体,目前被国际抗核抗体模式共识(ICAP)归类为抗细胞18(AC-18)模式,其临床意义在不同队列中有所不同,且仍未得到充分研究。

方法

我们对2019年1月至2021年9月期间在台湾长庚纪念医疗体系通过HEp-2 IFA进行抗核抗体(ANA)检测的患者进行了一项横断面研究。在7429例ANA阳性病例中,77例呈现AC-18模式,并进行了病历审查。随后进行了倾向评分(PS)匹配分析,其中53例呈现孤立AC-18模式的患者与265例对照受试者进行匹配,这些对照受试者从31143例ANA阴性个体中按1:5的比例选取。匹配基于年龄、性别和合并症。

结果

在77例AC-18模式阳性的患者中,14.3%患有干燥综合征(SjD),11.7%患有类风湿关节炎(RA),5.2%患有特发性炎性肌病(IIM),3.9%患有系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)。具体而言,29.9%患有各种类型的癌症。在PS匹配模型中,与对照组相比,呈现AC-18模式的患者中SjD、IIM和癌症的患病率显著更高,优势比(OR)分别为16.8(95%置信区间3.3, 85.7)、7.9(95%置信区间1.3, 48.4)和4.8(95%置信区间2.3, 10.3)。

结论

与ANA检测结果为阴性的个体相比,ANA检测呈阳性且显示AC-18模式的个体患癌症和自身免疫性疾病的患病率显著更高。

相似文献

1
Clinical significance of cytoplasmic discrete dots (AC-18) patterns in HEp-2 cell indirect Immunofluorescence: insights from a Taiwanese multicenter study.HEp-2细胞间接免疫荧光中细胞质离散点(AC-18)模式的临床意义:来自台湾多中心研究的见解
Clin Chim Acta. 2026 Jan 1;578:120521. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2025.120521. Epub 2025 Aug 6.
2
The spectrum of nuclear patterns with stained metaphase chromosome plate: morphology nuances, immunological associations, and clinical relevance.染色中期染色体板的核型图谱:形态细微差别、免疫学关联及临床相关性。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2025 Jun 18;63(10):1915-1927. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2025-0286. Print 2025 Sep 25.
3
Prevalence and titres of antinuclear antibodies in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.幼年特发性关节炎中抗核抗体的流行率和效价:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Autoimmun Rev. 2022 Jun;21(6):103086. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103086. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
4
Mapping of the Antinuclear Autoantibodies in Sudanese patients infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus after HAART receiving: A cross-sectional study.接受高效抗逆转录病毒治疗后感染人类免疫缺陷病毒的苏丹患者抗核自身抗体的图谱分析:一项横断面研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23367. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06389-9.
5
Anti-ribosomal-P protein antibodies and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE): in a cross-sectional study of Danish adult patients with SLE, no significant association is found between anti-ribosomal-P and neuropsychiatric SLE.抗核糖体P蛋白抗体与系统性红斑狼疮(SLE):在一项针对丹麦成年SLE患者的横断面研究中,未发现抗核糖体P蛋白与神经精神性SLE之间存在显著关联。
Lupus Sci Med. 2025 Aug 17;12(2):e001550. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2025-001550.
6
CytoBead ANA 2 assay - a novel method for the detection of antinuclear antibodies.细胞珠ANA 2检测法——一种检测抗核抗体的新方法。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04583-3.
7
Antinuclear Antibodies Staining Patterns and Titers in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.青少年特发性关节炎中的抗核抗体染色模式及滴度
Mod Rheumatol. 2025 Feb 4. doi: 10.1093/mr/roaf011.
8
Assessment of the Impact of Anti-nuclear Antibody (ANA) Titer and Pattern on Anti-extractable Nuclear Antigen (ENA) Positivity: Experience at Cheikh Khalifa Hospital.抗核抗体(ANA)滴度和模式对抗可提取核抗原(ENA)阳性的影响评估:谢赫·哈利法医院的经验
Cureus. 2025 Jun 10;17(6):e85723. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85723. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Are anti-nucleosome antibodies a better diagnostic marker than anti-dsDNA antibodies for systemic lupus erythematosus? A systematic review and a study of metanalysis.抗核小体抗体是否优于抗双链 DNA 抗体成为系统性红斑狼疮的更佳诊断标志物?系统评价和荟萃分析研究。
Autoimmun Rev. 2012 Dec;12(2):97-106. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Jul 15.
10
Detection of antinuclear antibodies: a survey done by the European Organsation for External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine.抗核抗体的检测:由欧洲检验医学外部质量保证提供者组织开展的一项调查。
Lab Med. 2025 Sep 8;56(5):528-535. doi: 10.1093/labmed/lmaf011.