• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一家二级护理教学医院的急诊科开展由药剂师主导的护理过渡计划:一项定性参与式协同设计方案。

Developing a pharmacist-led transition of care programme in the emergency department of a secondary care teaching hospital: a qualitative participatory co-design protocol.

作者信息

Alhmoud Eman, Barazi Raja, Zakaria Almunzer, Andraous Lubna, El Enany Rasha, Thomas Binny, Abdulrouf Palli Valapila, Pathan Sameer A, Nazar Hamde, Ibrahim Mohamed Izham Mohamed, Hadi Muhammad Abdul

机构信息

QU Health Sector, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.

Pharmacy Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 5;15(8):e106073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106073.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106073
PMID:40764078
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12336558/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Transitions from the emergency department (ED) to home are high-risk periods for medication-related harm. Pharmacist-led interventions during this period may improve medication safety and care continuity, yet co-design approaches to develop such interventions remain underused. The aim of this study is to co-design a pharmacist-led transition of care programme for patients discharged from the ED.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This study will be conducted at a 371-bed secondary-care teaching hospital in Qatar and will follow two sequential phases using qualitative and participatory methods. Phase I will involve focus groups and semistructured interviews with key stakeholders (clinical pharmacists, physicians, nurses and patients or patient representatives). Phase II will consist of an intervention co-design workshop with decision makers (leaders, policymakers and representatives from Phase I). Participants will be recruited using purposive and snowball sampling. Interviews will be audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data will be analysed using an inductive-deductive approach, guided by the Theoretical Domains Framework, the Care Transitions Framework and the APEASE (Affordability, Practicability, Effectiveness/cost-effectiveness, Acceptability, Side-effects/safety, Equity) criteria for evaluation of intervention feasibility.The anticipated outcome is a prototype intervention detailing target recipients, core components, workflow, implementation strategies and supporting tools. This prototype will be pilot-tested to assess feasibility and inform further refinement.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by the Medical Research Centre of Hamad Medical Corporation-Qatar (MRC-01-24-699) and Qatar University Institutional Review Board (QU-IRB 009/2025-EM). Written informed consent will be obtained from all study participants prior to participation. Research findings will be disseminated through institutional stakeholder briefings, presentations at national and international scientific conferences and publication in peer-reviewed journals. Patient representatives will contribute throughout the intervention development process.

摘要

引言

从急诊科(ED)过渡到家庭是药物相关伤害的高风险时期。在此期间,由药剂师主导的干预措施可能会提高用药安全性和护理连续性,但采用共同设计方法来制定此类干预措施的情况仍未得到充分利用。本研究的目的是共同设计一项由药剂师主导的针对从急诊科出院患者的护理过渡计划。

方法与分析

本研究将在卡塔尔一家拥有371张床位的二级护理教学医院进行,并将采用定性和参与式方法分两个连续阶段进行。第一阶段将包括与关键利益相关者(临床药剂师、医生、护士以及患者或患者代表)进行焦点小组讨论和半结构化访谈。第二阶段将由一个与决策者(第一阶段的领导、政策制定者和代表)共同设计干预措施的研讨会组成。将采用目的抽样和滚雪球抽样的方法招募参与者。访谈将进行录音并逐字转录。将使用归纳-演绎方法进行数据分析,以理论领域框架、护理过渡框架以及用于评估干预可行性的APEASE(可承受性、实用性、有效性/成本效益、可接受性、副作用/安全性、公平性)标准为指导。预期结果是一个详细说明目标受众、核心组成部分、工作流程、实施策略和支持工具的干预措施原型。该原型将进行试点测试,以评估可行性并为进一步完善提供依据。

伦理与传播

该研究已获得卡塔尔哈马德医疗公司医学研究中心(MRC-01-24-699)和卡塔尔大学机构审查委员会(QU-IRB 009/2025-EM)的批准。在参与之前,将从所有研究参与者处获得书面知情同意书。研究结果将通过机构利益相关者简报、在国内和国际科学会议上的演讲以及在同行评审期刊上发表来进行传播。患者代表将在整个干预措施开发过程中发挥作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c44a/12336558/77d586c3bcad/bmjopen-15-8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c44a/12336558/77d586c3bcad/bmjopen-15-8-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c44a/12336558/77d586c3bcad/bmjopen-15-8-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing a pharmacist-led transition of care programme in the emergency department of a secondary care teaching hospital: a qualitative participatory co-design protocol.在一家二级护理教学医院的急诊科开展由药剂师主导的护理过渡计划:一项定性参与式协同设计方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 5;15(8):e106073. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106073.
2
Timely post-discharge medication reviews to Improve Continuity-the Transitions Of Care stewardship (TIC TOC) study in rural and regional Australia: a parallel-group randomised controlled trial study protocol.澳大利亚农村和地区的及时出院后药物审查以改善连续性——护理过渡管理(TIC TOC)研究:一项平行组随机对照试验研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 18;15(6):e100588. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100588.
3
Does interdisciplinary group care for the treatment of endometriosis improve pain interference: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial at an urban academic medical centre.跨学科小组护理对子宫内膜异位症治疗的疼痛干扰改善情况:城市学术医疗中心一项试点随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 5;15(3):e097372. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097372.
4
Realist evaluation of Belgian pilot projects for paediatric transmural care: protocol for a mixed methods study.比利时儿科跨壁护理试点项目的现实主义评估:一项混合方法研究的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 25;15(6):e102152. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102152.
5
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术对女性和医护人员的可行性、可接受性及适宜性:LAVA试验定性过程评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325.
6
Pharmacist-led DE-eSCALation of opioids post-surgical dischargE (DESCALE) - A multi-centre, non-randomised, feasibility study protocol.药剂师主导的术后出院时阿片类药物降阶梯治疗(DESCALE)——一项多中心、非随机可行性研究方案
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Apr 10;4:48. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13716.2. eCollection 2024.
7
Pharmacist, nurse, and physician perspectives on the implementation of the pharmacist discharge care (pharm-dc) intervention: A qualitative study.药剂师、护士和医生对实施药剂师出院护理(pharm-dc)干预的看法:一项定性研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Aug;20(8):740-746. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.04.009. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
8
Intramuscular versus oral corticosteroids to reduce relapses following discharge from the emergency department for acute asthma.肌肉注射与口服皮质类固醇用于减少急性哮喘患者从急诊科出院后的复发情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 2;6(6):CD012629. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012629.pub2.
9
UK paediatric speech and language therapists' perceptions on the use of telehealth in current and future clinical practice: An application of the APEASE criteria.英国儿科言语治疗师对远程医疗在当前和未来临床实践中应用的看法:APPEASE 标准的应用。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2024 May-Jun;59(3):1163-1179. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12988. Epub 2023 Nov 27.
10
Community First Responders' role in the current and future rural health and care workforce: a mixed-methods study.社区第一响应者在当前和未来农村卫生和保健劳动力中的作用:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Jul;12(18):1-101. doi: 10.3310/JYRT8674.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of research co-design in health: a systematic overview of reviews and development of a framework.健康领域研究共同设计的评价:系统综述概述与框架的制定。
Implement Sci. 2024 Sep 11;19(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13012-024-01394-4.
2
Is it time to stop counting on saturation in pharmacy research? Ideas for a new way forward.是否到了停止依赖药学研究饱和度的时候了?一种新的前进思路。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Nov;20(11):1070-1074. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2024.08.002. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
3
Medication errors in emergency departments: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and severity.
急诊科用药错误:系统评价和荟萃分析的患病率和严重程度。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Oct;46(5):1024-1033. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01742-w. Epub 2024 May 11.
4
Impact of pharmacist-supported transition of care services in the Middle East and North Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.药剂师支持的中东和北非地区护理服务过渡的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Mar 11;17(1):2323099. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2323099. eCollection 2024.
5
Co-development and testing of an extended community pharmacy model of service delivery for managing osteoarthritis: protocol for a sequential, multi-methods study (PharmOA).协作开发和测试一种扩展的社区药房服务提供模式,用于管理骨关节炎:一项序贯、多方法研究(PharmOA)的方案。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Jan 12;25(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-07105-2.
6
Pharmacists and transitions of care from emergency department to home.药剂师与急诊到家庭的过渡护理。
Am J Manag Care. 2023 Dec;29(12):715-719. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2023.89473.
7
Creation of a theoretically rooted workbook to support implementers in the practice of knowledge translation.创建一个有理论根基的工作手册,以支持实施者进行知识转化实践。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Aug 18;4(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00480-w.
8
Effect of pharmacy-led interventions during care transitions on patient hospital readmission: A systematic review.药学主导的过渡期干预对患者住院再入院的影响:系统评价。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2022 Sep-Oct;62(5):1477-1498.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2022.05.017. Epub 2022 May 24.
9
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
10
Implementation of pharmacist targeted discharge prescription review in an emergency department.在急诊科实施药师靶向出院带药审核。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:288-294. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.054. Epub 2021 May 1.