• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

乳腺癌患者即刻乳房重建术后淋巴水肿风险降低:一项全国性回顾性研究。

Reduced risk of lymphedema after immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer: a retrospective nationwide study.

作者信息

Lee Jung Soo, Won Hye Sung, Nam Hyung Seok, Kim Yeo Hyung

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, 06591, Republic of Korea.

Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28584. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10430-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-10430-2
PMID:40764520
Abstract

This study assessed the impact of immediate breast reconstruction on lymphedema incidence in women diagnosed with breast cancer. We included 45,734 women aged ≥ 30 years treated for breast cancer (ICD-10 primary diagnostic code C50) since 2017. Propensity score-matched analysis compared patients who underwent immediate reconstruction (n = 5,256; stratified into implant and autologous groups), with those who did not (n = 5,256). Multivariate-adjusted extended Cox regression was used to assess lymphedema outcomes. Lymphedema incidences were similar between the immediate reconstruction (22.50%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.60-25.30%) and no reconstruction groups (25.30%; 95% CI: 22.50-28.00%; P = 0.180). After adjusting for age, surgery type, treatments, and comorbidities, immediate reconstruction showed an inverse association with lymphedema (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.85). When stratified by reconstruction method, implant reconstruction exhibited a reduced risk (adjusted HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67-0.82), while autologous reconstruction showed a higher risk (adjusted HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.39-2.78) for lymphedema. Immediate implant-based reconstruction may lower lymphedema risk, but interpretation requires caution due to potential selection bias, missing data on BMI, breast size, and applicability beyond East Asian populations. Further research with detailed patient information is needed to confirm clinical implications.

摘要

本研究评估了即刻乳房重建对被诊断为乳腺癌的女性淋巴水肿发生率的影响。我们纳入了自2017年以来接受乳腺癌治疗(国际疾病分类第十版原发性诊断编码C50)的45734名年龄≥30岁的女性。倾向评分匹配分析比较了接受即刻重建的患者(n = 5256;分为植入物组和自体组织组)与未接受即刻重建的患者(n = 5256)。采用多变量调整的扩展Cox回归来评估淋巴水肿结局。即刻重建组(22.50%;95%置信区间[CI]:19.60 - 25.30%)和未重建组(25.30%;95% CI:22.50 - 28.00%;P = 0.180)的淋巴水肿发生率相似。在调整年龄、手术类型、治疗方法和合并症后,即刻重建与淋巴水肿呈负相关(调整后风险比[HR],0.76;95% CI,0.69 - 0.85)。按重建方法分层时,植入物重建显示淋巴水肿风险降低(调整后HR,0.74;95% CI,0.67 - 0.82),而自体组织重建显示淋巴水肿风险较高(调整后HR,1.96;95% CI,1.39 - 2.78)。基于植入物的即刻重建可能会降低淋巴水肿风险,但由于存在潜在的选择偏倚、体重指数、乳房大小数据缺失以及东亚人群以外的适用性问题,解释时需谨慎。需要进一步研究详细的患者信息以确认其临床意义。

相似文献

1
Reduced risk of lymphedema after immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer: a retrospective nationwide study.乳腺癌患者即刻乳房重建术后淋巴水肿风险降低:一项全国性回顾性研究。
Sci Rep. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28584. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10430-2.
2
Implants versus autologous tissue flaps for breast reconstruction following mastectomy.乳房切除术乳房再造中假体与自体组织皮瓣的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 31;10(10):CD013821. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013821.pub2.
3
Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery for women with primary breast cancer.原发性乳腺癌患者的肿瘤整形保乳手术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 29;10(10):CD013658. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013658.pub2.
4
Skin-sparing mastectomy for the treatment of breast cancer.保留皮肤的乳腺癌乳房切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 27;3(3):CD010993. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010993.pub2.
5
Different types of implants for reconstructive breast surgery.用于乳房重建手术的不同类型植入物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 16;2016(5):CD010895. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010895.pub2.
6
Manual lymphatic drainage for lymphedema following breast cancer treatment.乳腺癌治疗后淋巴水肿的手法淋巴引流
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 21;2015(5):CD003475. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003475.pub2.
7
Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations.对携带BRCA1或BRCA2基因突变的女性进行降低风险的双侧输卵管卵巢切除术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 24;8(8):CD012464. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012464.pub2.
8
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.原发性手术后晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者残留病灶对生存预后的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2.
9
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?对于因恶性肿瘤导致骨缺损的患者,在重建下肢节段性切除时,采用带血管游离腓骨移植来增强照射后的自体骨移植,其骨愈合、功能及并发症发生率与无骨缺损且未进行增强的患者相比是否相当?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599.
10
Risk-reducing mastectomy for the prevention of primary breast cancer.预防性乳房切除术以预防原发性乳腺癌。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 5;4(4):CD002748. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002748.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Complete decongestive therapy phase 1: an expert consensus document.第一阶段完全消肿治疗:专家共识文件。
Med Oncol. 2024 Nov 2;41(12):304. doi: 10.1007/s12032-024-02407-4.
2
Association of the breast reconstruction modality with the development of postmastectomy lymphedema: A long-term follow-up study.乳房重建方式与乳腺癌根治术后淋巴水肿发生的相关性:一项长期随访研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Jul;49(7):1177-1183. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.01.027. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
3
Association between Immediate Breast Reconstruction and the Development of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.
即刻乳房重建与乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿发生的关系。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2023 Feb 1;151(2):214e-222e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009831. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
4
The Impact of Lymphedema on Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast Reconstruction: A Preliminary Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.淋巴水肿对乳房重建后患者报告结局的影响:初步倾向评分匹配分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2023 May;30(5):3061-3071. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-12994-z. Epub 2023 Jan 15.
5
Risk factors of unilateral breast cancer-related lymphedema: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 84 cohort studies.单侧乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿的危险因素:对84项队列研究的最新系统评价和荟萃分析
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec 14;31(1):18. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07508-2.
6
Breast Cancer Statistics, 2022.2022 年乳腺癌统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Nov;72(6):524-541. doi: 10.3322/caac.21754. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
7
Risk Factors and Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Patients With Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.乳腺癌相关淋巴水肿患者的风险因素和种族及民族差异。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Aug 1;8(8):1195-1200. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.1628.
8
Self-reported symptoms of arm lymphedema and health-related quality of life among female breast cancer survivors.女性乳腺癌幸存者的手臂淋巴水肿自报告症状和健康相关生活质量。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 21;11(1):10701. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89055-0.
9
Arm Morbidity After Local Therapy for Young Breast Cancer Patients.年轻乳腺癌患者局部治疗后的手臂并发症。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Oct;28(11):6071-6082. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-09947-3. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
10
Breast edema, from diagnosis to treatment: state of the art.乳腺水肿:从诊断到治疗的最新进展
Arch Physiother. 2021 Mar 29;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40945-021-00103-4.