Zou Bin, Yang Yuling, Zhang Lusheng, Chen Huabin, Zeng Fuqiang, Chen Biwei
Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Tenth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong, 528400, China.
Department of Medical Imaging, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Tenth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangdong, 528400, China.
Int J Emerg Med. 2025 Aug 5;18(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12245-025-00944-x.
Acute complete testicular torsion, acute incomplete testicular torsion, acute testicular ischemia, acute testicular appendage torsion, and acute epididymo-orchitis are common scrotal emergencies in urology. An accurate diagnosis of the cause of acute scrotal pain is crucial for selecting the appropriate treatment. This study aimed to explore the application of high-frequency ultrasonography (HFUS) and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the evaluation of acute scrotal lesions.
This study included 46 patients with acute scrotal pain. All patients underwent HFUS and CEUS prior to treatment. The ultrasonographic features of the affected and contralateral (healthy) testes were compared to evaluate the application of HFUS and CEUS for the assessment of acute scrotal lesions. Two patients with testicular ischemia were correctly diagnosed using both HFUS and CEUS. Among the nine patients with complete testicular torsion, eight were correctly diagnosed using HFUS, while one was only diagnosed as having an abnormal testis. In the cohort of 11 patients with incomplete testicular torsion, eight were accurately identified using HFUS, whereas three were erroneously diagnosed as having complete testicular torsion. Among the 15 patients with testicular appendage torsion, 14 were correctly diagnosed using HFUS, while one was misdiagnosed as having testicular torsion. Among the nine patients with epididymitis, seven were correctly diagnosed using HFUS, one was misdiagnosed as having testicular appendage torsion, and one was misdiagnosed as normal. However, CEUS results were consistent with the final confirmed diagnoses. The diagnostic accuracy of HFUS for acute scrotal lesions was 84.8%, whereas that of CEUS was 100%. The discrepancy between the two methods was statistically significant (χ = 3.50; P = 0.018, P < 0.05, respectively).
CEUS has higher accuracy in evaluating acute scrotal lesions. This can prevent misjudgment of the degree of testicular torsion, prevent misdiagnosis of testicular appendage torsion and epididymitis as testicular torsion, and avoid misjudgment of abnormal testes or epididymitides as normal. This helps prevent adverse outcomes such as delayed treatment and testicular removal.
急性完全性睾丸扭转、急性不完全性睾丸扭转、急性睾丸缺血、急性睾丸附件扭转和急性附睾炎是泌尿外科常见的阴囊急症。准确诊断急性阴囊疼痛的病因对于选择合适的治疗方法至关重要。本研究旨在探讨高频超声(HFUS)和超声造影(CEUS)在评估急性阴囊病变中的应用。
本研究纳入46例急性阴囊疼痛患者。所有患者在治疗前均接受了HFUS和CEUS检查。比较患侧和对侧(健康)睾丸的超声特征,以评估HFUS和CEUS在评估急性阴囊病变中的应用。2例睾丸缺血患者通过HFUS和CEUS均被正确诊断。在9例完全性睾丸扭转患者中,8例通过HFUS被正确诊断,1例仅被诊断为睾丸异常。在11例不完全性睾丸扭转患者中,8例通过HFUS被准确识别,3例被误诊为完全性睾丸扭转。在15例睾丸附件扭转患者中,14例通过HFUS被正确诊断,1例被误诊为睾丸扭转。在9例附睾炎患者中,7例通过HFUS被正确诊断,1例被误诊为睾丸附件扭转,1例被误诊为正常。然而,CEUS结果与最终确诊结果一致。HFUS对急性阴囊病变的诊断准确率为84.8%,而CEUS为100%。两种方法之间的差异具有统计学意义(χ=3.50;P=0.018,P<0.05)。
CEUS在评估急性阴囊病变方面具有更高的准确性。这可以防止对睾丸扭转程度的误判,防止将睾丸附件扭转和附睾炎误诊为睾丸扭转,避免将异常睾丸或附睾误诊为正常。这有助于预防诸如治疗延迟和睾丸切除等不良后果。