Meng Xianglong, Chen Xiuling, Zhang Bo, Wang Junru
Department of Nephrology and Institute of Nephrology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Kidney Diseases, Chengdu, China.
Department of Urology, Air Force Hospital of Western Theater Command, Chengdu, China.
Ren Fail. 2025 Dec;47(1):2540565. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2025.2540565. Epub 2025 Aug 5.
Although dietary patterns are recognized as modifiable risk factors for chronic kidney disease (CKD), comparative evidence on the differential impacts of commonly used dietary indices remains limited. This study aims to evaluate associations between four indices (Healthy Eating Index-2020, HEI-2020; alternative Mediterranean Diet Score, aMED; Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension, DASH; Dietary Inflammatory Index, DII) and CKD risk, and explore their population heterogeneity.
Utilizing cross-sectional data from NHANES (2000-2020), dietary scores were calculated for individuals with or without CKD. Logistic regressions estimated normalized odds ratio (ORs) per 25% scoring range increase. Predictive utility was assessed marginal receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, and nonlinear associations were detected using restricted cubic splines (RCS). Subgroup analyses were conducted across different population characteristics. Component analyses were used to evaluate which components within each dietary index exert a significant effect on CKD risk.
DASH (OR = 0.880, 95%CI: 0.812-0.954) and DII (OR = 1.099, 95%CI: 1.025-1.180) were significantly associated with CKD risk, only DII remained associated with CKD severity progression (OR = 1.264, 95%CI: 1.103-1.450). Dietary indices provided incremental utility second to comorbidities and age. Nonlinear analyses revealed that greater adherence to DASH/DII reduced CKD risk, with consistent results across subgroups of males, individuals over 65 years, Non-Hispanic Whites, both smokers and nonsmokers, family income-to-poverty ratio >3.5, and individuals with hypertension or without diabetes and cardiovascular diseases.
DASH and DII exhibited superior CKD risk discrimination versus other indices. Adopting dietary habits aligned with DASH/DII was most effective for reducing CKD risk in dietary interventions.
尽管饮食模式被认为是慢性肾脏病(CKD)的可改变风险因素,但关于常用饮食指数差异影响的比较证据仍然有限。本研究旨在评估四个指数(2020年健康饮食指数,HEI-2020;替代地中海饮食评分,aMED;终止高血压饮食方法,DASH;饮食炎症指数,DII)与CKD风险之间的关联,并探讨它们的人群异质性。
利用美国国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES,2000 - 2020年)的横断面数据,为患有或未患有CKD的个体计算饮食评分。逻辑回归估计每增加25%评分范围的标准化比值比(OR)。使用边际接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线评估预测效用,并使用受限立方样条(RCS)检测非线性关联。针对不同人群特征进行亚组分析。成分分析用于评估每个饮食指数中的哪些成分对CKD风险有显著影响。
DASH(OR = 0.880,95%CI:0.812 - 0.954)和DII(OR = 1.099,95%CI:1.025 - 1.180)与CKD风险显著相关,只有DII与CKD严重程度进展相关(OR = 1.264,95%CI:1.103 - 1.450)。饮食指数提供的效用仅次于合并症和年龄。非线性分析显示,更高程度地遵循DASH/DII可降低CKD风险,在男性、65岁以上个体、非西班牙裔白人、吸烟者和非吸烟者、家庭收入与贫困比>3.5以及患有高血压或无糖尿病和心血管疾病的个体亚组中结果一致。
与其他指数相比,DASH和DII对CKD风险的辨别能力更强。在饮食干预中,采用与DASH/DII一致的饮食习惯对降低CKD风险最为有效。