• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

钝性创伤中Ⅱ-Ⅲ级脾损伤处理的部分脾动脉栓塞术与脾切除术疗效比较的临床分析

Clinical analysis on comparison of outcomes between partial splenic artery embolization and splenectomy for management of grade II-III splenic injury in blunt trauma.

作者信息

Xu Xiaolong, Lv Meng, Wang Cheng, Mei Jianfeng

机构信息

Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic-Spleen-Gastrointestinal Surgery Surgeon, Lanxi People's Hospital, Jinhua, 321100, Zhejiang Province, China.

Department of Ophthalmology, Lanxi People's Hospital, Jinhua, Zhejiang Province, China.

出版信息

Eur J Med Res. 2025 Aug 5;30(1):707. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02968-8.

DOI:10.1186/s40001-025-02968-8
PMID:40765061
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The spleen is also the largest lymphoid organ and has important immune and haematopoietic functions. Traumatic splenic rupture often results in haemorrhagic shock and is life-threatening. In the past, total splenectomy was performed for various degrees of splenic injury, which caused great harm to the patient. Over the past few decades, the treatment of blunt splenic injury has also changed significantly, from total splenectomy to a focus on procedures that preserve splenic function. At the same time, the use of splenic artery embolization in high-grade splenic injuries has also reduced the failure rate of non-surgical treatment and the incidence of conversion to open splenectomy.

METHODS

According to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) spleen injury grading, this study selected 80 patients treated in our emergency department for blunt splenic injuries of grade II-III between 1 January 2023 and 1 January 2025. These patients were the study subjects (40 patients received partial splenic artery embolization (intervention group) and 40 patients received splenectomy (control group)). The clinical therapeutic outcomes of the two treatment approaches were analysed by SPSS.

RESULTS

In contrast to the control group, patients in the intervention group exhibited reduced operation time, time to first flatus, time to removal of drainage tubes and hospitalization time. Furthermore, the incidence of surgical complications was found to be lower in the intervention group than in the control group. The T lymphocyte CD4 + /CD8 values of the intervention group were higher than those in the control group at 2 and 4 weeks postoperatively, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Partial splenic artery embolization has obvious advantages in the treatment of grade II-III blunt splenic injuries, and provides data support and reference significance for the selection of treatment methods for low-grade blunt splenic injuries.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is a statistical analysis of relevant data for patients who have received a medical intervention and therefore does not involve trial registration.

摘要

背景

脾脏也是最大的淋巴器官,具有重要的免疫和造血功能。外伤性脾破裂常导致失血性休克,危及生命。过去,对于不同程度的脾损伤均行全脾切除术,给患者造成了极大伤害。在过去几十年中,钝性脾损伤的治疗也发生了显著变化,从全脾切除术转变为注重保留脾功能的手术。同时,脾动脉栓塞术在高级别脾损伤中的应用也降低了非手术治疗的失败率和转为开腹脾切除术的发生率。

方法

根据美国创伤外科学会(AAST)的脾损伤分级,本研究选取了2023年1月1日至2025年1月1日期间在我院急诊科接受治疗的80例II-III级钝性脾损伤患者。这些患者为研究对象(40例患者接受部分脾动脉栓塞术(干预组),40例患者接受脾切除术(对照组))。采用SPSS分析两种治疗方法的临床治疗效果。

结果

与对照组相比,干预组患者的手术时间、首次排气时间、引流管拔除时间和住院时间均缩短。此外,发现干预组的手术并发症发生率低于对照组。干预组术后2周和4周的T淋巴细胞CD4 + /CD8值高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。

结论

部分脾动脉栓塞术在治疗II-III级钝性脾损伤方面具有明显优势,为低级别钝性脾损伤治疗方法的选择提供了数据支持和参考意义。

试验注册

本研究是对接受医学干预患者的相关数据进行统计分析,因此不涉及试验注册。

相似文献

1
Clinical analysis on comparison of outcomes between partial splenic artery embolization and splenectomy for management of grade II-III splenic injury in blunt trauma.钝性创伤中Ⅱ-Ⅲ级脾损伤处理的部分脾动脉栓塞术与脾切除术疗效比较的临床分析
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Aug 5;30(1):707. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02968-8.
2
Retrospective Observational Study of the Management of Blunt Traumatic Splenic Injury 2017-2022 at Major Trauma Centres in England. What is the Current Role of Splenic Artery Embolisation?2017 - 2022年英格兰主要创伤中心钝性创伤性脾损伤管理的回顾性观察研究。脾动脉栓塞术目前的作用是什么?
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Mar;48(3):329-337. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03896-6. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
3
The impacts of different embolization techniques on splenic artery embolization for blunt splenic injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同栓塞技术对钝性脾损伤脾动脉栓塞的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Mil Med Res. 2017 May 30;4:17. doi: 10.1186/s40779-017-0125-6. eCollection 2017.
4
Outcomes of proximal versus distal splenic artery embolization after trauma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.创伤后脾动脉近端栓塞与远端栓塞的疗效:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Trauma. 2011 Jan;70(1):252-60. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f2a92e.
5
Splenic artery embolization in the treatment of blunt splenic injury: single level 1 trauma center experience.脾动脉栓塞术治疗钝性脾损伤:一级创伤中心的单中心经验
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2025 Jul 8;31(4):359-365. doi: 10.4274/dir.2024.242789. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Splenic function after angioembolization for splenic trauma in children and adults: A systematic review.儿童和成人脾外伤血管栓塞术后的脾功能:一项系统评价。
Injury. 2016 Mar;47(3):525-30. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.047. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
8
The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of carmustine implants and temozolomide for the treatment of newly diagnosed high-grade glioma: a systematic review and economic evaluation.卡莫司汀植入剂与替莫唑胺治疗新诊断的高级别胶质瘤的有效性和成本效益:一项系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2007 Nov;11(45):iii-iv, ix-221. doi: 10.3310/hta11450.
9
The role of splenic angioembolization as an adjunct to nonoperative management of blunt splenic injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.脾血管栓塞术作为钝性脾损伤非手术治疗辅助手段的作用:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Nov;83(5):934-943. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001649.
10
Is non-operative management safe and effective for all splenic blunt trauma? A systematic review.非手术治疗对所有脾钝性创伤都安全有效吗?一项系统评价。
Crit Care. 2013 Sep 3;17(5):R185. doi: 10.1186/cc12868.

本文引用的文献

1
Splenectomy versus angioembolization for severe splenic injuries in a national trauma registry: To save, or not to save, the spleen, that is the question.国家创伤登记处中脾切除术与血管栓塞术治疗严重脾损伤的比较:保脾还是不保脾,这是个问题。
Surgery. 2025 Apr;180:109058. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.109058. Epub 2025 Jan 4.
2
Splenic artery embolization for trauma: a narrative review.创伤性脾动脉栓塞术:一篇叙述性综述。
J Trauma Inj. 2024 Dec;37(4):252-261. doi: 10.20408/jti.2024.0056. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
3
Examination of Core Clinical Symptoms of Postoperative Fatigue Syndrome Following Colonoscopy With Sedation.
结肠镜检查镇静术后疲劳综合征核心临床症状的检查。
J Perianesth Nurs. 2025 Jun;40(3):712-717. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2024.08.023. Epub 2024 Dec 6.
4
Retrospective Observational Study of the Management of Blunt Traumatic Splenic Injury 2017-2022 at Major Trauma Centres in England. What is the Current Role of Splenic Artery Embolisation?2017 - 2022年英格兰主要创伤中心钝性创伤性脾损伤管理的回顾性观察研究。脾动脉栓塞术目前的作用是什么?
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2025 Mar;48(3):329-337. doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03896-6. Epub 2024 Nov 7.
5
Follow-up strategies after non-operative treatment of traumatic splenic injuries: a systematic review.创伤性脾损伤非手术治疗后的随访策略:系统评价。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Oct 21;409(1):315. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03504-8.
6
The independent prognostic value of perioperative hepatic venous pressure gradient measurements in patients with portal hypertension who underwent laparoscopic splenectomy plus esophagogastric devascularization.腹腔镜脾切除术加贲门血管离断术治疗门静脉高压症患者围手术期肝静脉压力梯度测量的独立预后价值。
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Oct 19;24(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03464-9.
7
Angioembolization in patients with blunt splenic trauma in Germany -guidelines vs. Reality a retrospective registry-based cohort study of the TraumaRegister DGU®.德国钝性脾外伤患者的血管栓塞治疗-基于创伤登记处 DGU®的回顾性队列研究:指南与现实。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Oct;50(5):2451-2462. doi: 10.1007/s00068-024-02640-6. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
8
Effect of a subanesthetic dose of esketamine combined with propofol on postoperative fatigue syndrome in patients undergoing gastroenterological endoscopy under anaesthesia: A retrospective study.麻醉剂量的艾司氯胺酮联合丙泊酚对接受麻醉下胃肠内镜检查患者术后疲劳综合征的影响:一项回顾性研究。
Pak J Med Sci. 2024 Sep;40(8):1781-1785. doi: 10.12669/pjms.40.8.9883.
9
Frequency of splenectomy for pediatric splenic injury in Brazil: a retrospective analysis.巴西小儿脾损伤脾切除术的频率:一项回顾性分析。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Jul 28;36:100844. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100844. eCollection 2024 Aug.
10
Predictors of portal vein thrombosis after simultaneous hepatectomy and splenectomy: A single-center retrospective study.同期肝切除术和脾切除术后门静脉血栓形成的预测因素:一项单中心回顾性研究。
Asian J Surg. 2024 Dec;47(12):5137-5142. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.07.131. Epub 2024 Jul 25.