• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术前坦索罗辛是否有助于半硬性输尿管镜治疗输尿管下段结石?一项前瞻性、随机双盲研究。

Does preoperative tamsulosin facilitate semirigid ureteroscopic management of lower ureteric calculi? A prospective, randomized double-blind study.

作者信息

Shahat Ahmed A, Elderwy Ahmad A, Gaber Mahmoud A, Mohammed Nasreldin

机构信息

Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assuit University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt.

出版信息

Curr Urol. 2025 Jul;19(4):253-256. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000286. Epub 2025 May 23.

DOI:10.1097/CU9.0000000000000286
PMID:40765537
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12321460/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of tamsulosin before semirigid ureteroscopy (URS) for proximal ureteral stones increases operative success. Several authors have used α-blockers for dilation of the ureter, and most studies have observed a higher stone-free rate and fewer complications than those with a placebo or no use of drugs. Ureteroscopy is the standard treatment for ureteral stones and has excellent outcomes. This study aimed to assess the effect of preoperative tamsulosin on the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of URS in the management of lower ureteric stones.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. A total of 80 patients were included, 40 in each group. The closed envelope method of randomization was performed at the Assiut Urology and Nephrology Hospital (Urology Department), Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Egypt, from December 2019 to November 2021.

RESULTS

Both groups showed no significant differences in age, and the majority of patients in both groups were male. Most patients had a moderate degree of obstruction, and the stones were radiopaque. Both groups showed insignificant differences in stone size (11.93 ± 3.39 vs. 12.40 ± 4.24 mm, = 0.30). Operative time was significantly shorter in the study group than in the control group (61.50 ± 23.99 vs. 79.80 ± 23.22 minutes, = 0.001). The control group had a significantly higher frequency of need for dilatation (80% vs. 20%, < 0.001) and need to stent than the study group (60% vs. 22.5%, = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative tamsulosin facilitates URS for lower ureteric stones. It decreases operative time, the need for dilation, and the need for postoperative indwelling ureteral stenting. It also increases the success rate but does not significantly affect the complication rate.

摘要

背景

在半硬性输尿管镜检查(URS)治疗近端输尿管结石前使用坦索罗辛可提高手术成功率。几位作者使用α受体阻滞剂扩张输尿管,大多数研究观察到与使用安慰剂或不使用药物相比,结石清除率更高且并发症更少。输尿管镜检查是输尿管结石的标准治疗方法,效果良好。本研究旨在评估术前坦索罗辛对URS治疗下段输尿管结石术中及术后结果的影响。

材料与方法

这是一项双盲随机安慰剂对照临床试验。共纳入80例患者,每组40例。2019年12月至2021年11月,在埃及阿斯尤特大学医学院阿斯尤特泌尿外科和肾脏病医院(泌尿外科)采用封闭信封随机法。

结果

两组在年龄上无显著差异,两组大多数患者为男性。大多数患者有中度梗阻,结石不透X线。两组结石大小无显著差异(11.93±3.39 vs. 12.40±4.24 mm,P = 0.30)。研究组手术时间显著短于对照组(61.50±23.99 vs. 79.80±23.22分钟,P = 0.001)。对照组扩张需求频率(80% vs. 20%,P < 0.001)和留置支架需求频率显著高于研究组(60% vs. 22.5%,P = 0.001)。

结论

术前坦索罗辛有助于URS治疗下段输尿管结石。它可减少手术时间、扩张需求和术后输尿管留置支架的需求。它还可提高成功率,但对并发症发生率无显著影响。

相似文献

1
Does preoperative tamsulosin facilitate semirigid ureteroscopic management of lower ureteric calculi? A prospective, randomized double-blind study.术前坦索罗辛是否有助于半硬性输尿管镜治疗输尿管下段结石?一项前瞻性、随机双盲研究。
Curr Urol. 2025 Jul;19(4):253-256. doi: 10.1097/CU9.0000000000000286. Epub 2025 May 23.
2
Smooth sailing or rocky road in navigating the ureteral orifice: Does preoperative tamsulosin improve success of primary ureteroscopy in children?输尿管口操作是一帆风顺还是充满坎坷:术前服用坦索罗辛能否提高儿童原发性输尿管镜检查的成功率?
J Pediatr Urol. 2025 Apr 17. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.04.010.
3
Ureteroscopy Versus Double J Stenting in Emergency Treatment of Obstructive Lithiasis.输尿管镜检查与双J管置入术在梗阻性结石急诊治疗中的比较
Maedica (Bucur). 2023 Dec;18(4):586-592. doi: 10.26574/maedica.2023.18.4.586.
4
Alpha-blockers as medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones.α受体阻滞剂作为输尿管结石的药物排石疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 2(4):CD008509. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008509.pub2.
5
Efficacy and Safety of Alfuzosin as Medical Expulsive Therapy for Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.阿夫唑嗪作为输尿管结石药物排石疗法的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 5;10(8):e0134589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134589. eCollection 2015.
6
What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review.输尿管镜术与体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的利弊:系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):772-786. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
7
Pre-operative endometrial thinning agents before endometrial destruction for heavy menstrual bleeding.对于月经过多患者,在进行子宫内膜破坏术前使用的术前子宫内膜减薄剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 15;2013(11):CD010241. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010241.pub2.
8
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones in adults.经皮肾镜碎石术与逆行性肾内手术治疗成人肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 13;11(11):CD013445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013445.pub2.
9
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7(12):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub3.
10
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD006029. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of efficacy of various drugs used for medical expulsive therapy for distal ureter stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较各种药物用于医学排石疗法治疗输尿管下段结石的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Sep;75(9):e14214. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14214. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
Adjunction of tamsulosin or mirabegron before semi-rigid ureterolithotripsy improves outcomes: prospective, randomized single-blind study.在半硬性输尿管镜碎石术之前加用坦索罗辛或米拉贝隆可改善疗效:前瞻性、随机、单盲研究。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2019 Jun;51(6):931-936. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02142-0. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
3
Efficacy of silodosin on the outcome of semi-rigid ureteroscopy for the management of large distal ureteric stones: blinded randomised trial.西洛多辛对大型远端输尿管结石半硬性输尿管镜治疗效果的影响:双盲随机试验
Arab J Urol. 2018 Jul 26;16(4):422-428. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2018.07.002. eCollection 2018 Dec.
4
Safety and efficacy of silodosin and tadalafil in ease of negotiation of large ureteroscope in the management of ureteral stone: A prosective randomized trial.西洛多辛与他达拉非在输尿管结石治疗中辅助大型输尿管镜操作的安全性和有效性:一项前瞻性随机试验
Turk J Urol. 2017 Dec;43(4):484-489. doi: 10.5152/tud.2017.83548. Epub 2017 Dec 1.
5
Do alpha-1 antagonist medications affect the success of semi-rigid ureteroscopy? A prospective, randomised, single-blind, multicentric study.α1 受体拮抗剂类药物会影响半硬性输尿管镜手术的成功率吗?一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、多中心研究。
Urolithiasis. 2018 Nov;46(6):567-572. doi: 10.1007/s00240-017-1026-6. Epub 2017 Nov 18.
6
Epidemiology of stone disease across the world.全球结石病的流行病学。
World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1301-1320. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
7
Semi-Rigid Ureteroscopy for Proximal Ureteral Stones: Does Adjunctive Tamsulosin Therapy Increase the Chance of Success?半硬性输尿管镜治疗近端输尿管结石:辅助坦索罗辛治疗能否增加成功几率?
Urol Int. 2017;98(4):411-417. doi: 10.1159/000452926. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
8
Effect of Tamsulosin on Stone Passage for Ureteral Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.坦索罗辛对输尿管结石排石的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Mar;69(3):353-361.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.06.044. Epub 2016 Sep 8.
9
Medical expulsive therapy for ureteral stones: where do we go from here?医学排石疗法治疗输尿管结石:我们的下一步在哪里?
Nat Rev Urol. 2016 Oct;13(10):608-12. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2016.146. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
10
Cost-effectiveness of medical expulsive therapy using alpha-blockers for the treatment of distal ureteral stones.使用α受体阻滞剂进行药物排石治疗远端输尿管结石的成本效益分析。
Eur Urol. 2008 Feb;53(2):411-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.09.012. Epub 2007 Sep 18.