• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小口径、导丝引导胸腔引流管在患有创伤性和非创伤性胸膜疾病成年患者中的失败率及并发症:一项系统评价

Failure rate and complications of small-bore, wire-guided chest drains in adult patients presenting with traumatic and nontraumatic pleural diseases: A systematic review.

作者信息

Alomar Zubaidah, Tawfek Zainab, Alomar Yousif, Mahmood Ismail, Alomar Ali, El-Menyar Ayman, Rizoli Sandro, Al-Thani Hassan

机构信息

Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.

Emergency Department, Al Ahli Hospital, Doha, Qatar.

出版信息

Qatar Med J. 2025 Jun 9;2025(2):55. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2025.55. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.5339/qmj.2025.55
PMID:40765729
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12322596/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pleural diseases are common and often require drainage, with the growing use of small-bore chest drains (SBCDs) instead of larger tubes. This review aimed to examine the failure rate and complications associated with SBCD use in different pleural pathologies.

METHODS

A literature search (PubMed, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar) was performed on the complications associated with SBCDs to treat pleural diseases. This review analyzed patient demographics, indications, outcomes, failure rate, and complications associated with the use of SBCDs. The systematic review was conducted using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines.

RESULTS

Thirty studies were included in this review with 4,973 patients. The indications for insertions of SBCDs were pleural effusion at 48.4%, pneumothorax at 30.1%, empyema or parapneumonic effusion at 11.4%, hemothorax at 6.5%, and other indications at 3.6%. The overall failure rate to achieve satisfactory drainage was 19.4%. Significant complications included iatrogenic pneumothorax at 11.9%, major hemorrhage at 1.0%, local bleeding at 0.7%, infection at 1.2%, and iatrogenic organ injury at 0.9%. Other insertional complications included tube dislodgement at 5.9%, tube blockage at 5.4%, tube kinking at 3.7%, misplacement at 3.3%, and subcutaneous hematoma at 0.5%. Most of the data published revolves around hemodynamically stable patients with SBCD insertions and is, thus, deficient regarding hemodynamically unstable patients.

CONCLUSION

Despite carrying notable failure rates and complications, small-bore catheters remain an acceptable option for managing selected pleural diseases.

摘要

背景

胸膜疾病很常见,通常需要进行引流,如今越来越多地使用小口径胸腔引流管(SBCD)而非较大的引流管。本综述旨在研究在不同胸膜病变中使用SBCD的失败率及相关并发症。

方法

针对与SBCD治疗胸膜疾病相关的并发症进行了文献检索(PubMed、SCOPUS和谷歌学术)。本综述分析了患者的人口统计学特征、适应证、治疗结果、失败率以及与使用SBCD相关的并发症。系统评价按照PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南进行。

结果

本综述纳入了30项研究,共4973例患者。插入SBCD的适应证为胸腔积液占48.4%,气胸占30.1%,脓胸或肺炎旁胸腔积液占11.4%,血胸占6.5%,其他适应证占3.6%。实现满意引流的总体失败率为19.4%。显著并发症包括医源性气胸占11.9%,大出血占1.0%,局部出血占0.7%,感染占1.2%,医源性器官损伤占0.9%。其他插入相关并发症包括引流管移位占5.9%,引流管堵塞占5.4%,引流管扭曲占3.7%,位置不当占3.3%,皮下血肿占0.5%。大多数已发表的数据围绕血流动力学稳定的患者插入SBCD展开,因此在血流动力学不稳定的患者方面存在不足。

结论

尽管存在显著的失败率和并发症,但小口径导管仍是治疗某些胸膜疾病的可接受选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3c/12322596/3b16a0cccd62/qmj-2025-02-055-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3c/12322596/0a45ef3d4ce1/qmj-2025-02-055-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3c/12322596/ed3d3d4befd0/qmj-2025-02-055-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3c/12322596/3b16a0cccd62/qmj-2025-02-055-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3c/12322596/0a45ef3d4ce1/qmj-2025-02-055-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3c/12322596/ed3d3d4befd0/qmj-2025-02-055-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b3c/12322596/3b16a0cccd62/qmj-2025-02-055-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Failure rate and complications of small-bore, wire-guided chest drains in adult patients presenting with traumatic and nontraumatic pleural diseases: A systematic review.小口径、导丝引导胸腔引流管在患有创伤性和非创伤性胸膜疾病成年患者中的失败率及并发症:一项系统评价
Qatar Med J. 2025 Jun 9;2025(2):55. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2025.55. eCollection 2025.
2
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Apr 21;4(4):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub3.
3
Surgical versus non-surgical management for pleural empyema.胸腔积脓的手术治疗与非手术治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 17;3(3):CD010651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010651.pub2.
4
Interventions for the management of malignant pleural effusions: a network meta-analysis.恶性胸腔积液管理的干预措施:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 May 8;2016(5):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub2.
5
Outcomes of Pigtail Catheter Placement versus Chest Tube Placement in Adult Thoracic Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.猪尾导管置管与胸腔引流管置管在成人胸部创伤患者中的结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am Surg. 2023 Jun;89(6):2743-2754. doi: 10.1177/00031348231157809. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
6
Conservative and surgical modalities in the management of paediatric parapneumonic effusion and empyema: a protocol for a living systematic review and network meta-analysis.儿童肺炎旁胸腔积液和脓胸的保守和手术治疗方法:一项基于活系统评价和网络荟萃分析的方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 24;11(3):e045010. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045010.
7
The quantity, quality and findings of network meta-analyses evaluating the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs for weight loss: a scoping review.评估胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RAs)减肥效果的网状Meta分析的数量、质量及结果:一项范围综述
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jun 25:1-73. doi: 10.3310/SKHT8119.
8
Pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusions.恶性胸腔积液的胸膜固定术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(1):CD002916. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002916.pub2.
9
Management of Benign Pleural Effusions Using Indwelling Pleural Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.使用留置胸膜导管治疗良性胸腔积液:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chest. 2017 Mar;151(3):626-635. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2016.10.052. Epub 2016 Nov 11.
10
Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for internal jugular vein catheterization.超声引导与解剖标志用于颈内静脉置管的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 9;1(1):CD006962. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006962.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Chest Tube Size Selection: Evaluating Provider Practices, Treatment Efficacy, and Complications in Management of Thoracic Trauma.胸腔引流管大小选择:评估提供者实践、治疗效果和胸部创伤管理中的并发症。
Am Surg. 2024 Jun;90(6):1501-1507. doi: 10.1177/00031348241241735. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
2
Pleural effusion in critically ill patients and intensive care setting.重症患者及重症监护环境下的胸腔积液
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Feb 16;11(5):989-999. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i5.989.
3
Outcomes of Pigtail Catheter Placement versus Chest Tube Placement in Adult Thoracic Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
猪尾导管置管与胸腔引流管置管在成人胸部创伤患者中的结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am Surg. 2023 Jun;89(6):2743-2754. doi: 10.1177/00031348231157809. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
4
Reintervention Rate After Pigtail Catheter Insertion Compared to Surgical Chest Tubes.经皮穿刺引流(猪尾巴导管)与外科胸腔引流管的再次介入率比较。
Am Surg. 2023 Dec;89(12):5487-5491. doi: 10.1177/00031348231157419. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
5
Trocar vs. Seldinger small bore pleural drains: does the technique influence the outcomes? A prospective single-centre study.套管针与 Seldinger 法小口径胸腔引流管:操作技术是否影响结果?一项前瞻性单中心研究。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Jan;27(2):728-736. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202301_31075.
6
The Application of Pigtail Catheters in Postoperative Drainage of Lung Cancer.猪尾导管在肺癌术后引流中的应用
Clin Lung Cancer. 2022 May;23(3):e196-e202. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2021.07.010. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
7
Small Drainage Volumes of Pleural Effusions Are Associated with Complications in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Analysis.胸腔积液引流量少与危重症患者并发症相关:一项回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 1;10(11):2453. doi: 10.3390/jcm10112453.
8
Overuse of small chest drains for pleural effusions: a retrospective practice review.胸腔积液中小胸管过度使用:回顾性实践评估。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2021 Apr 30;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-11-2020-0231.
9
Percutaneous Ultrasound-guided Pigtail Catheter for Pleural Effusions: Efficacy and Safety.经皮超声引导下猪尾导管治疗胸腔积液:疗效与安全性
Oman Med J. 2021 Mar 31;36(2):e248. doi: 10.5001/omj.2021.19. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
The small (14 Fr) percutaneous catheter (P-CAT) versus large (28-32 Fr) open chest tube for traumatic hemothorax: A multicenter randomized clinical trial.小口径(14Fr)经皮导管(P-CAT)与大口径(28-32Fr)开胸管治疗创伤性血胸:一项多中心随机临床试验。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Nov 1;91(5):809-813. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003180.