Akshaya V, Shakya Neelam, Newaskar Vilas P, Agrawal Deepak
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Government College of Dentistry, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Jan-Jun;15(1):40-45. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_161_23. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
The study was carried out to compare platysma myocutaneous flap and extended nasolabial flap in terms of post-operative mouth opening, duration of surgery and complications associated with it in the surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis (OSMF).
Patients diagnosed with OSMF (Grade III and IV OSMF according to Khanna and Andrade classification) were included in the study. Thirty patients were selected for the study, out of which 15 patients underwent reconstruction of surgical defects with platysma myocutaneous flap (Group I), and other 15 patients underwent reconstruction with extended nasolabial flap (Group II) post fibrotomy. Pre-operative and post-operative mouth opening, duration of surgery and other complications associated with both procedures were recorded. Postoperatively, patients were evaluated at the end of 1 week, 3 months and 6 months.
The results were analysed using an Unpaired -test and Chi-square test. The mean pre-operative interincisal mouth opening in both the groups i.e., Group I was 11.8 mm and Group II was 9.82 mm. It was significantly improved to a mean of 31.9 mm in Group I and 33.87 mm in Group II postoperatively at 6 months of follow-up. However, no significant difference in mouth opening was observed between the groups preoperatively and postoperatively. The mean duration of surgery in Group I was 119.66 ± 12.60 min and was found to be significantly higher than in Group II, which was 102.33 ± 8.83 min. Extraoral scarring was present in both groups. Intraoral hair growth was observed in almost all the male patients in Group II. Transient marginal mandibular nerve injury was reported in four patients (26.6%) in Group II.
Both the platysma myocutaneous flap and the extended nasolabial flap serve as a versatile flap in the surgical management of OSMF. However, in young patients, platysma myocutaneous flap can be preferred as scar is present on the collar region as compared to facial scar in the nasolabial flap.
本研究旨在比较颈阔肌肌皮瓣和延长鼻唇沟皮瓣在口腔黏膜下纤维化(OSMF)手术治疗中的术后开口度、手术时长及相关并发症。
纳入诊断为OSMF的患者(根据Khanna和Andrade分类为III级和IV级OSMF)。选取30例患者进行研究,其中15例患者采用颈阔肌肌皮瓣修复手术缺损(I组),另外15例患者在纤维切开术后采用延长鼻唇沟皮瓣修复(II组)。记录术前和术后的开口度、手术时长及与两种手术相关的其他并发症。术后,在1周、3个月和6个月时对患者进行评估。
采用非配对t检验和卡方检验分析结果。两组术前平均切牙间开口度,即I组为11.8 mm,II组为9.82 mm。在随访6个月时,I组术后平均开口度显著提高至31.9 mm,II组为33.87 mm。然而,术前和术后两组间开口度无显著差异。I组平均手术时长为119.66±12.60分钟,显著高于II组的102.33±8.83分钟。两组均存在口外瘢痕。II组几乎所有男性患者均出现口内毛发增生。II组有4例患者(26.6%)报告有短暂性下颌缘神经损伤。
颈阔肌肌皮瓣和延长鼻唇沟皮瓣在OSMF的手术治疗中均是多功能皮瓣。然而,对于年轻患者,与鼻唇沟皮瓣的面部瘢痕相比,颈阔肌肌皮瓣因瘢痕位于领口区域可能更受青睐。