How Joan, Leiva Orly, Redd Robert, Marneth Anna E, DeAngelo Daniel J, Dieli-Conwright Christina M, El-Jawahri Areej, Kamaz Baransel, Kim Chulwoo, Lindsley R Coleman, Luskin Marlise, Stahl Maximilian, Wazir Mohammed, Weeks Lachelle D, Hobbs Gabriela S
Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY.
Blood Vessel Thromb Hemost. 2025 Jan 15;2(3):100051. doi: 10.1016/j.bvth.2025.100051. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) are important modifiers of thrombosis in patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and myelofibrosis (MF). We performed a retrospective cohort analysis evaluating CVRFs in 1005 patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Hematologic Malignancies Data Repository from 2014 to 2023. We also included a non-MPN group of 1543 age- and sex-matched controls with no known diagnoses of hematologic malignancies to evaluate whether CVRFs differentially affected outcomes. CVRFs were identified through International Classification of Diseases codes for hypertension, hyperlipidemia, type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), current smoking, or body mass index ≥30 before MPN diagnosis. CVRFs occurred in 34% of patients with MPNs. Patients with MPN with ≥1 CVRF had increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR], 2.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-3.35) and arterial/venous thrombosis (HR, 3.05; 95% CI 2.39-3.92). Within MPN subtypes, patients with ET, PV, and MF who had CVRFs also demonstrated worse overall survival and thrombotic outcomes. Among CVRFs, only DM2 predicted worse thrombotic outcomes in patients with MPNs. The HR of CVRF on thrombosis was decreased in patients with MPNs compared with non-MPN controls (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36-0.86). Looking at ET, PV, and MF specifically, the presence of a CVRF also had less of an impact on thrombotic risk in ET compared with controls (HR, 0.35; = .019); no interactions between MPN diagnosis and CVRFs were seen in patients with PV and MF. Our results underscore both the necessity of managing CVRFs in MPNs to improve patient morbidity and mortality and the need to ameliorate thrombotic risk with measures beyond addressing CVRFs.
心血管危险因素(CVRFs)是原发性血小板增多症(ET)、真性红细胞增多症(PV)和骨髓纤维化(MF)患者血栓形成的重要调节因素。我们进行了一项回顾性队列分析,评估了2014年至2023年来自达纳-法伯癌症研究所血液恶性肿瘤数据存储库的1005例骨髓增殖性肿瘤(MPN)患者的CVRFs。我们还纳入了1543例年龄和性别匹配、无血液系统恶性肿瘤确诊记录的非MPN对照组,以评估CVRFs是否对结局有不同影响。通过国际疾病分类代码识别出CVRFs,包括高血压、高脂血症、2型糖尿病(DM2)、当前吸烟,或MPN诊断前体重指数≥30。34%的MPN患者存在CVRFs。有≥1种CVRF的MPN患者死亡风险增加(风险比[HR],2.52;95%置信区间[CI],1.9 - 3.35),动脉/静脉血栓形成风险增加(HR,3.05;95% CI 2.39 - 3.92)。在MPN亚型中,患有CVRFs的ET、PV和MF患者总体生存率和血栓形成结局也较差。在CVRFs中,只有DM2预示着MPN患者血栓形成结局较差。与非MPN对照组相比,MPN患者中CVRF对血栓形成的HR降低(HR,0.51;95% CI,0.36 - 0.86)。具体来看ET、PV和MF,与对照组相比,CVRF的存在对ET患者血栓形成风险的影响也较小(HR,0.35;P = 0.019);在PV和MF患者中未观察到MPN诊断与CVRFs之间的相互作用。我们的结果强调了管理MPN患者CVRFs以改善患者发病率和死亡率的必要性,以及需要通过解决CVRFs之外的措施来改善血栓形成风险。