Squizzato Alessandro, Romualdi Erica, Passamonti Francesco, Middeldorp Saskia
Research Center on Thromboembolic Disorders and Antithrombotic Therapies, Department of Clinical and ExperimentalMedicine,School of Medicine, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD006503. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006503.pub3.
Polycythaemia vera and essential thrombocythaemia are chronic Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms that increase the risk of arterial and venous thrombosis, as well as bleeding. In addition to the different therapeutic strategies available, an antiplatelet drug is often used to reduce thrombotic risk.
To quantify the benefit and harm of antiplatelet drugs for long-term primary and secondary prophylaxis of arterial and venous thrombotic events in patients with polycythaemia vera or essential thrombocythaemia.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), The Cochrane Library (Issue 1 2012), MEDLINE (1966 to 2012), and EMBASE (1980 to 2012), as well as online registers of ongoing trials and conference proceedings. The date of the last search was October 2012.
We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing long-term (>6 months) use of an antiplatelet drug versus placebo or no treatment in participants with polycythaemia vera or essential thrombocythaemia, as diagnosed by established international criteria, with data for at least one of the selected outcomes.
Using a pre-defined extraction form, two review authors independently screened results, extracted data, and assessed quality. We planned to analyse the following outcomes: mortality from arterial and venous thrombotic events (primary efficacy outcome), mortality from bleeding episodes (primary safety outcome), fatal and non-fatal arterial thrombotic events, fatal and non-fatal venous thrombotic events, micro-circulation events, transient neurological and ocular manifestations, major and minor bleeding episodes, and all-cause mortality and any adverse events. We based quantitative analysis of outcome data on an intention-to-treat principle. We used the pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) with a fixed-effect model (Mantel-Haenszel) to estimate the overall treatment effect.
We identified no new studies from the updated searches. We included in this review two RCTs for a total of 630 participants. Both RCTs included participants with an established diagnosis of polycythaemia vera and with no clear indication or contraindication to aspirin therapy. We judged both studies to be of moderate quality. Published data from both studies were insufficient for a time-to-event data analysis and for some of the primary and secondary outcomes that we planned. The use of low-dose aspirin, compared with placebo, was associated with a lower risk of fatal thrombotic events (although this benefit was not statistically significant (OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.14; P = 0.07). No data on mortality from bleeding episodes were available. A non-significant benefit of aspirin was shown for all-cause mortality (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.01; P = 0.05). No increase in the risk of major bleeding was reported in participants taking aspirin compared with those given placebo (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.23 to 4.36; P = 0.99), and a non-significant increase with aspirin treatment was shown for minor bleeding (OR 1.85, 95% CI 0.90 to 3.79; P = 0.09). No published studies have reported findings in participants with essential thrombocythaemia or in the study of other antiplatelet drugs.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: For patients with polycythaemia vera who have no clear indication or contraindication to aspirin therapy, available evidence suggests that the use of low-dose aspirin, when compared with no treatment, is associated with a statistically non-significant reduction in the risk of fatal thrombotic events and all-cause mortality, without an increased risk of major bleeding.
真性红细胞增多症和原发性血小板增多症是慢性费城染色体阴性骨髓增殖性肿瘤,会增加动脉和静脉血栓形成以及出血的风险。除了现有的不同治疗策略外,常使用抗血小板药物来降低血栓形成风险。
量化抗血小板药物对真性红细胞增多症或原发性血小板增多症患者长期一级和二级预防动脉和静脉血栓事件的益处和危害。
我们检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、《Cochrane图书馆》(2012年第1期)、MEDLINE(1966年至2012年)和EMBASE(1980年至2012年),以及正在进行的试验在线注册库和会议论文集。最后一次检索日期为2012年10月。
我们纳入了所有随机对照试验(RCT),这些试验比较了根据既定国际标准诊断为真性红细胞增多症或原发性血小板增多症的参与者长期(>6个月)使用抗血小板药物与安慰剂或不治疗的情况,并至少有一项所选结局的数据。
使用预先定义的提取表格,两名综述作者独立筛选结果、提取数据并评估质量。我们计划分析以下结局:动脉和静脉血栓事件导致的死亡率(主要疗效结局)、出血事件导致的死亡率(主要安全性结局)、致命和非致命动脉血栓事件、致命和非致命静脉血栓事件、微循环事件、短暂性神经和眼部表现、严重和轻微出血事件、全因死亡率以及任何不良事件。我们基于意向性分析原则对结局数据进行定量分析。我们使用固定效应模型(Mantel-Haenszel)的合并比值比(OR)及其95%置信区间(CI)来估计总体治疗效果。
在更新的检索中未发现新的研究。本综述纳入了两项RCT,共630名参与者。两项RCT均纳入了已确诊真性红细胞增多症且无明确阿司匹林治疗指征或禁忌证的参与者。我们将两项研究均判定为中等质量。两项研究的已发表数据不足以进行事件发生时间数据分析以及我们计划的一些主要和次要结局分析。与安慰剂相比,使用低剂量阿司匹林与致命血栓事件风险较低相关(尽管这一益处无统计学意义(OR 0.20,95%CI 0.03至1.14;P = 0.07))。没有关于出血事件导致的死亡率的数据。阿司匹林对全因死亡率显示出非显著益处(OR 0.46,95%CI 0.21至1.01;P = 0.05)。与服用安慰剂的参与者相比,服用阿司匹林者未报告严重出血风险增加(OR 0.99,95%CI 0.23至4.36;P = 0.99),阿司匹林治疗导致轻微出血有非显著增加(OR 1.85,95%CI 0.90至3.79;P = 0.09)。没有已发表的研究报告原发性血小板增多症患者或其他抗血小板药物研究的结果。
对于无明确阿司匹林治疗指征或禁忌证的真性红细胞增多症患者,现有证据表明,与不治疗相比,使用低剂量阿司匹林与致命血栓事件风险和全因死亡率在统计学上非显著降低相关,且严重出血风险未增加。