Sharaf Mesbah Fathy, Shahen Abdelhalem Mahmoud
Department of Economics, Faculty of Arts, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Department of Economics, College of Business, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Front Sociol. 2025 Jul 22;10:1573489. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2025.1573489. eCollection 2025.
This study revisits the paradox of the contented female worker by analyzing gender disparities in job satisfaction in Egypt and Tunisia.
Using nationally representative labor force survey data, we construct a multidimensional job satisfaction index based on eight dimensions: earnings, job security, nature of work, working hours, work schedule, work environment, commuting distance, and job-qualification match. To explain gender gaps in job satisfaction, we apply the Blinder-Oaxaca decomposition method, both with and without correcting for sample selection bias.
Our results show that conclusions about the existence and direction of the gender gap depend critically on accounting for selection effects. Before correcting for selection bias, women in Egypt report significantly higher job satisfaction than men, while no gender gap is observed in Tunisia-echoing the contented female worker paradox. However, once sample selection is controlled for, the paradox disappears in both countries. In Egypt, the observed gender gap is fully explained by differences in observable characteristics (endowment effect), while in Tunisia, it is largely driven by differences in returns to those characteristics (coefficient effect), highlighting structural inequalities in the labor market.
To test the robustness of our results, we also conduct the decomposition using an alternative measure of job satisfaction based on a single overall satisfaction question. The consistency of results across both measures reinforces the validity of our conclusions. Together, these findings caution against relying solely on standard models of job satisfaction and emphasize the importance of considering sample selection and multidimensional outcomes. The study underscores the need for policy interventions that promote fairer working conditions, expand access to employment benefits, and address gender-based disparities in labor markets.
本研究通过分析埃及和突尼斯工作满意度中的性别差异,重新审视了满足的职业女性这一悖论。
利用具有全国代表性的劳动力调查数据,我们基于八个维度构建了一个多维工作满意度指数:收入、工作保障、工作性质、工作时间、工作安排、工作环境、通勤距离以及工作与资格匹配度。为了解释工作满意度中的性别差距,我们应用了布林德-奥瓦卡分解方法,包括校正和未校正样本选择偏差两种情况。
我们的结果表明,关于性别差距的存在和方向的结论严重依赖于对选择效应的考量。在校正选择偏差之前,埃及女性报告的工作满意度显著高于男性,而在突尼斯未观察到性别差距——这与满足的职业女性悖论相符。然而,一旦控制了样本选择,这一悖论在两个国家都消失了。在埃及,观察到的性别差距完全由可观察特征的差异(禀赋效应)所解释,而在突尼斯,它主要由这些特征的回报差异(系数效应)驱动,凸显了劳动力市场中的结构性不平等。
为了检验我们结果的稳健性,我们还使用基于单个总体满意度问题的工作满意度替代指标进行了分解。两种指标结果的一致性强化了我们结论的有效性。总之,这些发现提醒我们不要仅仅依赖工作满意度的标准模型,并强调了考虑样本选择和多维结果的重要性。该研究强调了政策干预的必要性,这些干预措施应促进更公平的工作条件、扩大就业福利的获取范围,并解决劳动力市场中基于性别的差异。