• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对失败的韧带增强系统(LARS)前交叉韧带重建进行的单阶段自体移植翻修术:至少5年随访期内临床结果得到改善。

Single-stage autograft revision for failed ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Improved clinical outcomes at a minimum 5-year follow-up.

作者信息

Akrivos Vasileios S, Koutalos Antonios, Nastas Ioannis, Gkekas Nifon, Akritidis Pavlos, Gatos Evangelos, Hantes Michael

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Musculoskeletal Trauma, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences University of Thessalia Larissa Greece.

出版信息

J Exp Orthop. 2025 Aug 5;12(3):e70381. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70381. eCollection 2025 Jul.

DOI:10.1002/jeo2.70381
PMID:40766804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12322687/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate mid-term clinical outcomes and intraoperative findings in patients undergoing single-stage revision after failed ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent ACL revision surgery following initial reconstruction using the LARS device. Clinical assessments included the Tegner activity scale, Lysholm Knee score, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, recorded preoperatively and at a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Preoperative imaging was conducted to assess tunnel widening, alignment, and the presence of arthritic changes. Intraoperative evaluations included arthroscopic inspection of the synovium, menisci, and cartilage. Synovial biopsies were obtained for histological analysis of inflammation.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included in the study. Clinical scores demonstrated significant improvement in Tegner activity scale ( = 0.0006), Lysholm Knee score ( = 0.0001) and IKDC score ( = 0.0001) following revision surgery, with a mean follow-up duration of 7.8 years (SD = 2.13). Preoperative imaging revealed early arthritic changes in 52% of patients. Intraoperative findings showed that all patients exhibited synovial membrane inflammation, with a 100% incidence of synovitis. Additionally, 68% of patients presented with Stage III or IV chondral lesions according to the ICRS classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Single-stage revision ACLR using autografts led to significant clinical improvement after LARS ACLR failure, with a mean follow-up of 7.8 years. All cases during revision demonstrated synovial inflammation, with a high prevalence of chondral lesions and early arthritis. While these findings may point to a potential association between synthetic grafts and degenerative joint pathology, causality cannot be established, as degenerative changes are known to occur following failed ACL reconstructions regardless of graft type.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

摘要

目的

评估韧带增强系统(LARS)前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)失败后接受单阶段翻修手术患者的中期临床疗效和术中发现。

方法

这项回顾性研究评估了使用LARS装置进行初次重建后接受ACL翻修手术的患者。临床评估包括Tegner活动量表、Lysholm膝关节评分和国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)评分,在术前和至少5年的随访时记录。术前进行影像学检查以评估隧道增宽、对线情况和关节炎改变的存在。术中评估包括关节镜检查滑膜、半月板和软骨。获取滑膜活检组织进行炎症组织学分析。

结果

25例患者纳入研究。翻修手术后,Tegner活动量表(P = 0.0006)、Lysholm膝关节评分(P = 0.0001)和IKDC评分(P = 0.0001)均有显著改善,平均随访时间为7.8年(标准差 = 2.13)。术前影像学检查显示52%的患者有早期关节炎改变。术中发现所有患者均表现为滑膜炎症,滑膜炎发生率为100%。此外,根据国际软骨修复协会(ICRS)分类,68%的患者出现III期或IV期软骨损伤。

结论

自体移植物单阶段翻修ACLR在LARS ACLR失败后带来了显著的临床改善,平均随访7.8年。翻修过程中的所有病例均表现为滑膜炎症,软骨损伤和早期关节炎的患病率较高。虽然这些发现可能表明合成移植物与退行性关节病变之间存在潜在关联,但无法确定因果关系,因为已知无论移植物类型如何,ACL重建失败后都会发生退行性改变。

证据级别

IV级。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34dc/12322687/175217262679/JEO2-12-e70381-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34dc/12322687/7c543a53ff4e/JEO2-12-e70381-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34dc/12322687/175217262679/JEO2-12-e70381-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34dc/12322687/7c543a53ff4e/JEO2-12-e70381-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/34dc/12322687/175217262679/JEO2-12-e70381-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Single-stage autograft revision for failed ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS) anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Improved clinical outcomes at a minimum 5-year follow-up.针对失败的韧带增强系统(LARS)前交叉韧带重建进行的单阶段自体移植翻修术:至少5年随访期内临床结果得到改善。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Aug 5;12(3):e70381. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70381. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Augmented With Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization Is Equivalent to Hamstring Autograft Reconstruction at Short- and Mid-Term Follow-Up: A Systematic Review.前交叉韧带修复联合动态内置稳定与短期和中期随访的腘绳肌腱重建相当:系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2024 Jul;40(7):2121-2131.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.12.011. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
3
Consistent Indications and Good Outcomes Despite High Variability in Techniques for Two-Stage Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.尽管两阶段翻修前交叉韧带重建技术存在高度变异性,但仍有明确的适应证和良好的结果:系统评价。
Arthroscopy. 2023 Sep;39(9):2098-2111. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
4
Evaluating outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with rectangular tunnel technique using a bone-patellar tendon-bone graft: A propensity score matching analysis indicating comparable results to primary reconstruction.评估采用矩形隧道技术并用髌腱骨移植进行前交叉韧带翻修重建的结果:一项倾向评分匹配分析表明其结果与初次重建相当。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12741.
5
Partial Transphyseal All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Skeletally Immature Adolescent Patients: Two-Year Minimum Follow-up Clinical and Radiologic Results.骨骼未成熟青少年患者的部分经骨骺全关节镜下前交叉韧带重建:至少两年随访的临床和影像学结果
Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 26;13(6):23259671251350298. doi: 10.1177/23259671251350298. eCollection 2025 Jun.
6
Contralateral hamstring autografts do not provide benefit compared to ipsilateral hamstring autografts in primary or revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review.在初次或翻修前交叉韧带重建中,与同侧腘绳肌自体移植物相比,对侧腘绳肌自体移植物并无优势:一项系统评价
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Dec;31(12):5641-5651. doi: 10.1007/s00167-023-07597-4. Epub 2023 Oct 21.
7
What Is the Mid-term Failure Rate of Revision ACL Reconstruction? A Systematic Review.前交叉韧带重建翻修术的中期失败率是多少?一项系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Oct;475(10):2484-2499. doi: 10.1007/s11999-017-5379-5.
8
Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带重建中用于移植物固定的生物可吸收与金属干涉螺钉对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 24;7(7):CD009772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009772.pub2.
9
Patient and Operative Risk Factors for Subsequent Knee Arthroplasty After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Cohort Study of 52,222 Patients.初次前交叉韧带重建术后后续膝关节置换术的患者及手术风险因素:一项对52222例患者的队列研究
Am J Sports Med. 2025 Jul 7:3635465251352180. doi: 10.1177/03635465251352180.
10
Risk factors for ACL revision failure and optimum graft size for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.前交叉韧带翻修失败的危险因素及翻修前交叉韧带重建的最佳移植物尺寸
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 19;35(1):260. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04381-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (LARS) synthetic grafts are safe and effective for medial collateral ligament and posterolateral corner reconstructions in elite athletes.韧带增强与重建系统(LARS)合成移植物在精英运动员的内侧副韧带和后外侧角重建中安全有效。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025 Jan;33(1):191-200. doi: 10.1002/ksa.12363. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
2
Biomechanical and Histological Study of Retrieved LARS Synthetic Ligaments.取出的 LARS 合成韧带的生物力学和组织学研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Jul;52(8):1979-1983. doi: 10.1177/03635465241253266. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
3
Massive foreign body reaction and osteolysis following primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the ligament augmentation and reconstruction system (LARS): a case report with histopathological and physicochemical analysis.
初次前交叉韧带重建术后采用韧带增强和重建系统(LARS)导致的异物巨细胞反应和骨溶解:病例报告并结合组织病理学和物理化学分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 30;23(1):1140. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05984-5.
4
Revision Rates After Primary ACL Reconstruction Performed Between 1969 and 2018: A Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis.1969年至2018年间初次前交叉韧带重建后的翻修率:一项系统评价和Meta回归分析
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Aug 5;10(8):23259671221110191. doi: 10.1177/23259671221110191. eCollection 2022 Aug.
5
Long-term outcomes of surgery using the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System as treatment for anterior cruciate ligament tears.使用 Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System 治疗前交叉韧带撕裂的手术的长期结果。
Bone Joint J. 2022 Feb;104-B(2):242-248. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-0798.R2.
6
Histological analysis of ACL reconstruction failures due to synthetic-ACL (LARS) ruptures.由于合成 ACL(LARS)破裂导致 ACL 重建失败的组织学分析。
Acta Biomed. 2020 May 30;91(4-S):136-145. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9702.
7
Primary ACL reconstruction using the LARS device is associated with a high failure rate at minimum of 6-year follow-up.采用 LARS 装置进行初次 ACL 重建,在至少 6 年的随访中失败率较高。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Nov;27(11):3626-3632. doi: 10.1007/s00167-019-05478-3. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
8
Allograft tendons are a safe and effective option for revision ACL reconstruction: a clinical review.同种异体肌腱是一种安全有效的前交叉韧带重建翻修选择:临床综述。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019 Jun;27(6):1771-1781. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-5147-4. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
9
Comparison of artificial graft versus autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis.前交叉韧带重建中人工移植物与自体移植物的比较:一项荟萃分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 19;18(1):309. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1672-4.
10
Autograft versus allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.前交叉韧带重建中自体移植与异体移植的比较:一项采用试验序贯分析的荟萃分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Sep;95(38):e4936. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004936.