Mateos María-Victoria, Paiva Bruno, Cedena M Teresa, Puig Noemí, Sureda-Balari Ana Maria, de la Calle Verónica Gonzalez, Oriol Albert, Ocio Enrique M, Rosiñol Laura, Montes Yolanda González, Bargay Joan, García María Esther González, Lakhwani Sunil, Payer Angel Ramirez, Suarez-Cabrera Alexia, Blanchard María-Jesús, Garzón Sebastián, Montero Felipe Casado, Cabañas Valentín, de Oteyza Jaime Pérez, Gironella Mercedes, Martinez-Lopez Joaquín, Casasús Ana Isabel Teruel, Delgado-Beltrán María Pilar, Prieto Elena, Lahuerta Juan José, Bladé Joan, San-Miguel Jesús
Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca, Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular del Cáncer (Universidad de Salamanca-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), CIBERONC, Salamanca, Spain.
Hematology Department, Cancer Center Clínica Universidad de Navarra (CCUN), CIMA, IDISNA, CIBERONC, Pamplona, Spain.
Lancet Haematol. 2025 Aug;12(8):e588-e598. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(25)00143-7.
Triplet and quadruplet regimens based on bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (VMP) and lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) with anti-CD38 antibodies are potential treatments for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. However, the high risk of toxic effects in this population requires frailty-based therapy adaptation. We aimed to compare the response of carfilzomib-based triplet and quadruplet regimens with a VMP-Rd regimen in newly diagnosed transplant-ineligible patients with multiple myeloma, considering patient frailty.
GEM-2017FIT was an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial at 57 hospitals in Spain. Patients aged 65-80 years were enrolled and assessed for frailty using the Geriatric Assessment in Hematology (GAH) scale. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive 18-cycle induction therapy of VMP 9-Rd 9 (one six-week cycle of melphalan 9 mg/m and prednisone 60 mg/m on days 1-4; bortezomib 1·3 mg/m subcutaneous twice weekly, followed by eight four-week cycles of weekly VMP and nine four-week cycles of lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1-21 and dexamethasone 40 mg weekly), carfilzomib-based triplet (KRd; carfilzomib intravenously 20 mg/m [only in the infusion on day 1 in first cycle] or 36 mg/m on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 in cycles 1-2, 56 mg/m in cycles 3-18, plus Rd) or daratumumab-KRd (D-KRd; daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenous weekly [cycles 1-2], biweekly [cycles 3-6], and every 4 weeks [cycles 7-18]). All patients who completed induction therapy and consolidation were stratified by measurable residual disease status and both those with undetectable measurable residual disease and detectable measurable residual disease were subsequently randomly assigned (1:1) to maintenance therapy with daratumumab and lenalidomide or no maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint was measurable residual disease negativity after induction, which was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03742297.
Between October 15, 2018 and December 15, 2021, 540 patients were enrolled and assessed for eligibility. 462 were eligible for the study and randomly assigned to VMP 9-Rd 9 (n=154), KRd (n=154) or D-KRd (n=154, with one patient subsequently found to be ineligible). 230 (50%) of 461 patients were male and 231 (50%) were female. Patients were followed up for a median of 33·15 months (IQR 25·82-43·08). The 18-cycle undetectable measurable residual disease rate with a sensitivity level of 10 in the intention-to-treat population was higher in the KRd group (83 [54%] of 154 patients; odds ratio [OR] 1·73, 95% CI 1·39-2·16; p<0·0001) and D-KRd group (94 [61%] of 153 patients; 2·03, 1·61-2·57; p<0·0001) than in the VMP 9-Rd 9 group (41 [27%] of 154 patients). The incidence of grade 3-4 neutropenia was lower in the KRd group (37 [24%] of 154 patients) compared with the VMP 9-Rd 9 group (62 [40%] of 154 patients) and D-KRd group (63 [41%] of 153 patients). Grade 3-4 infections occurred in 19 (12%) patients in the VMP 9-Rd 9 group, 23 (15%) patients in the KRd group, and 25 (16%) patients in the D-KRd group. Toxicity-related death occurred in a similar frequency in the VMP 9-Rd 9 (seven [5%] patients) and KRd (five [3%] patients) groups, but was significantly higher in the D-KRd group (13 [8%] patients; OR 0·53, 95% CI 0·22-1·30; p=0·16).
KRd and D-KRd were superior to VMP 9-Rd 9 in achieving measurable residual disease negativity after 18 cycles. This study could contribute to incorporation of quadruplet therapy into clinical practice and supports the need for frailty-based assessment in therapy selection.
PETHEMA.
基于硼替佐米、美法仑和泼尼松(VMP)以及来那度胺和地塞米松(Rd)并联合抗CD38抗体的三联和四联方案是新诊断的不适于移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者的潜在治疗方法。然而,该人群中毒副作用风险较高,需要根据虚弱程度调整治疗方案。我们旨在比较基于卡非佐米的三联和四联方案与VMP-Rd方案在新诊断的不适于移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者中的疗效,并考虑患者的虚弱程度。
GEM-2017FIT是一项在西班牙57家医院进行的开放标签、随机、3期试验。纳入年龄在65-80岁的患者,并使用血液学老年评估(GAH)量表评估其虚弱程度。患者被随机分配(1:1:1)接受18周期的诱导治疗,即VMP 9-Rd 9(第1-4天为一个六周周期,美法仑9 mg/m²和泼尼松60 mg/m²;硼替佐米1.3 mg/m²皮下注射,每周两次,随后是八个四周周期的每周VMP以及九个四周周期,来那度胺25 mg在第1-21天服用,地塞米松40 mg每周一次)、基于卡非佐米的三联方案(KRd;卡非佐米静脉注射20 mg/m²[仅在第1周期第1天的输注中使用]或在第1-2周期的第1、2、8、9、15和16天使用36 mg/m²,第3-18周期使用56 mg/m²,加Rd)或达雷妥尤单抗-KRd(D-KRd;达雷妥尤单抗16 mg/kg静脉注射,第1-2周期每周一次,第3-6周期每两周一次,第7-18周期每四周一次)。所有完成诱导治疗和巩固治疗的患者根据可测量残留病状态进行分层,随后将可测量残留病未检测到和可检测到的患者均随机分配(1:1)接受达雷妥尤单抗和来那度胺维持治疗或不接受维持治疗。主要终点是诱导后可测量残留病阴性,在意向性治疗人群中进行评估。该试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,注册号为NCT03742297。
在2018年10月15日至2021年12月15日期间,540名患者被纳入并评估 eligibility。462名患者符合研究条件并被随机分配至VMP 9-Rd 9组(n = 154)、KRd组(n = 154)或D-KRd组(n = 154,随后发现一名患者不符合条件)。461名患者中,230名(50%)为男性,231名(50%)为女性。患者的中位随访时间为33.15个月(IQR 25.82 - 43.08)。在意向性治疗人群中,KRd组(154名患者中的83名[54%];优势比[OR] 1.73,95% CI 1.39 - 2.16;p < 0.0001)和D-KRd组(153名患者中的94名[61%];2.03,1.61 - 2.57;p < 0.0001)的18周期可测量残留病未检测到率高于VMP 9-Rd 9组(154名患者中的41名[27%])。KRd组(154名患者中的37名[24%])3-4级中性粒细胞减少的发生率低于VMP 9-Rd 9组(154名患者中的62名[40%])和D-KRd组(153名患者中的63名[