Usmani Saad Z, Facon Thierry, Hungria Vania, Bahlis Nizar J, Venner Christopher P, Braunstein Marc, Pour Ludek, Martí Josep M, Basu Supratik, Cohen Yael C, Matsumoto Morio, Suzuki Kenshi, Hulin Cyrille, Grosicki Sebastian, Legiec Wojciech, Beksac Meral, Maiolino Angelo, Takamatsu Hiroyuki, Perrot Aurore, Turgut Mehmet, Ahmadi Tahamtan, Liu Weiping, Wang Jianping, Chastain Katherine, Vermeulen Jessica, Krevvata Maria, Lopez-Masi Lorena, Carey Jodi, Rowe Melissa, Carson Robin, Zweegman Sonja
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
University of Lille, CHU de Lille, Service des Maladies du Sang, Lille, France.
Nat Med. 2025 Apr;31(4):1195-1202. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03485-7. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
Frontline daratumumab-based triplet and quadruplet standard-of-care regimens have demonstrated improved survival outcomes in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). For patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM, triplet therapy with either daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (D-Rd) or bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) is the current standard of care. This phase 3 trial evaluated subcutaneous daratumumab plus VRd (D-VRd) in patients with transplant-ineligible NDMM or for whom transplant was not planned as the initial therapy (transplant deferred). Some 395 patients with transplant-ineligible or transplant-deferred NDMM were randomly assigned to eight cycles of D-VRd or VRd followed by D-Rd or Rd until progression. The primary endpoint was overall minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rate at 10 by next-generation sequencing. Major secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) or better (≥CR) rate, progression-free survival and sustained MRD-negativity rate at 10. At a median follow-up of 58.7 months, the MRD-negativity rate was 60.9% with D-VRd versus 39.4% with VRd (odds ratio, 2.37; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.58-3.55; P < 0.0001). Rates of ≥CR (81.2% versus 61.6%; P < 0.0001) and sustained MRD negativity (≥12 months; 48.7% versus 26.3%; P < 0.0001) were significantly higher with D-VRd versus VRd. Risk of progression or death was 43% lower for D-VRd versus VRd (hazard ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.41-0.79; P = 0.0005). Adverse events were consistent with the known safety profiles for daratumumab and VRd. Combining daratumumab with VRd produced deeper and more durable MRD responses versus VRd alone. The present study supports D-VRd quadruplet therapy as a new standard of care for transplant-ineligible or transplant-deferred NDMM. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03652064 .
基于达雷妥尤单抗的一线三联和四联标准治疗方案已证明可改善新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者的生存结局。对于不符合移植条件的NDMM患者,达雷妥尤单抗联合来那度胺和地塞米松(D-Rd)或硼替佐米、来那度胺和地塞米松(VRd)的三联疗法是当前的标准治疗方案。这项3期试验评估了皮下注射达雷妥尤单抗联合VRd(D-VRd)用于不符合移植条件的NDMM患者或未计划将移植作为初始治疗(移植延期)的患者。约395例不符合移植条件或移植延期的NDMM患者被随机分配接受8个周期的D-VRd或VRd治疗,随后接受D-Rd或Rd治疗直至疾病进展。主要终点是通过下一代测序在10时的总体微小残留病(MRD)阴性率。主要次要终点包括完全缓解(CR)或更好(≥CR)率、无进展生存期和在10时的持续MRD阴性率。在中位随访58.7个月时,D-VRd组的MRD阴性率为60.9%,而VRd组为39.4%(优势比,2.37;95%置信区间(CI),1.58 - 3.55;P < 0.0001)。D-VRd组的≥CR率(81.2%对61.6%;P < 0.0001)和持续MRD阴性率(≥12个月;48.7%对26.3%;P < 0.0001)显著高于VRd组。D-VRd组的疾病进展或死亡风险比VRd组低43%(风险比,0.57;95% CI,0.41 - 0.79;P = 0.0005)。不良事件与达雷妥尤单抗和VRd已知的安全性特征一致。与单独使用VRd相比,将达雷妥尤单抗与VRd联合使用可产生更深且更持久的MRD反应。本研究支持D-VRd四联疗法作为不符合移植条件或移植延期的NDMM的新标准治疗方案。ClinicalTrials.gov注册号:NCT03652064 。
N Engl J Med. 2024-1-25
N Engl J Med. 2024-10-31
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025-7-7
Hematol Oncol. 2025-6
N Engl J Med. 2024-10-31
N Engl J Med. 2024-1-25
Blood Cancer J. 2023-7-20