Manzano-Finol Alexander, Parra-Pelosi Heliana, Cubillos-Valencia Gabriel, Urdaneta Juan, Rivera-Porras Diego, Chacín Maricarmen, Bermúdez Valmore
Endocrine and Metabolic Diseases Research Center, School of Medicine, Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo, 4002, Venezuela.
Internal Medicine Department, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, USA.
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-05056-8.
BACKGROUND: Laser-Assisted Lipolysis (LAL) has emerged as a modern advancement in body contouring, offering solutions to limitations of traditional liposuction such as prolonged recovery, increased bruising, and limited skin-tightening effects. By using targeted laser energy to liquefy fat before removal, LAL minimizes tissue trauma, enhances skin retraction, and improves overall aesthetic outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To provide a comprehensive review of the historical evolution, current technological advances, comparative methodologies, limitations, and future directions of LAL in cosmetic surgery. METHODS: A narrative literature review was conducted, incorporating peer-reviewed articles, FDA-cleared devices, and clinical studies. Topics included the historical progression of LAL since its inception in the late 1990s, comparative analyses between LAL and traditional techniques, evaluation of laser wavelengths (e.g., 1064, 1320, 1444, and 1470 nm), and examination of innovations such as dual-wavelength systems, robotic-assisted delivery, AI-guided planning, and radiofrequency-assisted methods. RESULTS: LAL shows clinical advantages including faster recovery times, reduced postoperative pain, and improved skin tightening, especially in small to moderate fat reduction areas. Dual- and multi-wavelength lasers, pulse modulation, and fiber-optic temperature sensing improve precision and safety. Comparative studies show LAL achieves better outcomes than traditional liposuction in certain contexts, particularly for skin appearance and submental fat reduction. However, variability in laser parameters, higher procedural costs, and limitations in autologous fat reuse remain concerns. Research also highlights promising applications of LAL in large-volume fat removal and potential bariatric contexts. CONCLUSION: LAL has evolved into a valuable technique in modern aesthetic surgery. While not a replacement for traditional liposuction in all cases, it offers meaningful benefits as a stand-alone or adjunct procedure. Continued innovations, such as nanotechnology, biodegradable fibers, and AI-assisted planning, may further enhance its effectiveness, precision, and personalization in future body contouring practices. Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
背景:激光辅助脂肪分解术(LAL)已成为身体塑形领域的一项现代进展,它为传统抽脂术的局限性提供了解决方案,如恢复时间长、瘀伤增加以及皮肤紧致效果有限等问题。通过在去除脂肪前使用靶向激光能量将脂肪液化,LAL可将组织创伤降至最低,增强皮肤回缩,并改善整体美学效果。 目的:全面综述LAL在整形手术中的历史演变、当前技术进展、比较方法、局限性及未来发展方向。 方法:进行了一项叙述性文献综述,纳入了同行评审文章、美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准的设备及临床研究。主题包括自20世纪90年代末LAL诞生以来的历史进程、LAL与传统技术的比较分析、激光波长(如1064、1320、1444和1470纳米)的评估,以及对双波长系统、机器人辅助输送、人工智能引导规划和射频辅助方法等创新技术的研究。 结果:LAL显示出临床优势,包括恢复时间更快、术后疼痛减轻以及皮肤紧致改善,尤其是在中小面积脂肪减少区域。双波长和多波长激光、脉冲调制以及光纤温度传感提高了精准度和安全性。比较研究表明,在某些情况下,LAL比传统抽脂术能取得更好的效果,特别是在皮肤外观和颏下脂肪减少方面。然而,激光参数的变异性、更高的手术成本以及自体脂肪再利用的局限性仍然令人担忧。研究还强调了LAL在大量脂肪去除和潜在减肥手术中的应用前景。 结论:LAL已发展成为现代美容手术中的一项有价值的技术。虽然在所有情况下它都不能替代传统抽脂术,但作为一种独立或辅助手术,它具有显著的益处。纳米技术、可生物降解纤维和人工智能辅助规划等持续创新可能会在未来的身体塑形实践中进一步提高其有效性、精准度和个性化程度。证据级别V 本期刊要求作者为每篇文章指定一个证据级别。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参考目录或作者在线指南www.springer.com/00266。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025-8-6
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025-6-30
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025-5-12
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024-7-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
Data Brief. 2024-10-18
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024-8-6
Aesthet Surg J. 2024-6-14
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023-4-13
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2023-3