George Claudene J, Kyaw Kay Thwe, Hall Charles B, Weiss Erica F, Verghese Joe, Abadir Peter
Montefiore Medical Center, Division of Geriatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
J Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Aug 6:13872877251365541. doi: 10.1177/13872877251365541.
BackgroundHypertension (HTN) is a major risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias. Renin-angiotensin system (RAS) medications, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), have been proposed to mitigate cognitive decline, but evidence remains inconsistent.ObjectiveCompare global cognition over time among ARB, ACEI, and non-RAS drug users.MethodsData from the Rush Memory and Aging Project (1997-2006) included 2019 participants. Global cognition was assessed using a composite z-score of 19 cognitive tests. Participants were categorized by medication use: ARB, ACEI, or non-RAS. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to compare cognitive outcomes over 9 years, adjusting for baseline cognition, social determinants, and medical factors. Subgroup analyses evaluated cognitive domains and the impact of HTN.ResultsAt baseline, ARB and ACEI users had more vascular risk factors and medical conditions than non-RAS users. At 9 years, ARB users had slightly better global cognitive outcomes compared to ACEI (LS-mean difference: 0.015, 95% CI [-0.175, 0.205]) and non-RAS users (LS-mean difference: 0.06, 95% CI [-0.11, 0.23]), though differences were not statistically significant. ACEI users showed significant improvement in working memory compared to non-RAS users (LS-mean: 0.157, 95% CI [0.002, 0.313]). Among participants without HTN, ACEI use was associated with significantly reduced cognitive decline compared to non-RAS use.ConclusionsARBs may benefit global cognitive function, while ACEIs may yield improvements in specific domains like working memory. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the impact of drug characteristics such as blood-brain-barrier penetration.
背景
高血压(HTN)是阿尔茨海默病(AD)及相关痴呆症的主要危险因素。包括血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)和血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂(ARB)在内的肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)药物已被提出可减轻认知衰退,但证据仍不一致。
目的
比较ARB、ACEI和非RAS药物使用者随时间推移的整体认知情况。
方法
拉什记忆与衰老项目(1997 - 2006年)的数据包括2019名参与者。使用19项认知测试的综合z分数评估整体认知。参与者按药物使用情况分类:ARB、ACEI或非RAS。进行协方差分析(ANCOVA)以比较9年期间的认知结果,并对基线认知、社会决定因素和医学因素进行调整。亚组分析评估认知领域和高血压的影响。
结果
在基线时,ARB和ACEI使用者比非RAS使用者有更多的血管危险因素和医学状况。在9年时,与ACEI使用者(最小二乘均值差异:0.015,95%可信区间[-0.175, 0.205])和非RAS使用者(最小二乘均值差异:0.06,95%可信区间[-0.11, 0.23])相比,ARB使用者的整体认知结果略好,尽管差异无统计学意义。与非RAS使用者相比,ACEI使用者在工作记忆方面有显著改善(最小二乘均值:0.157,95%可信区间[0.002, 0.313])。在没有高血压的参与者中,与使用非RAS药物相比,使用ACEI与认知衰退显著减少相关。
结论
ARB可能有益于整体认知功能,而ACEI可能在工作记忆等特定领域产生改善。需要进一步研究来证实这些发现,并探索药物特性如血脑屏障穿透性的影响。