Neville Sarah Elizabeth, Kim Edward J, Horvath Laura, Vaughan Yasmine, Kulanda George, Baun Johanese, Naavo Maada
Brown School of Public Health, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI 02903, USA.
Bentley University, 175 Forest Street, Waltham, MA 02452, USA.
Child Youth Care Forum. 2025 May 5. doi: 10.1007/s10566-025-09866-4.
Recognizing children's right to grow up in a family, advocates have long called for evidence-based interventions to prevent children from needlessly entering residential care. However, such programs have rarely been evaluated in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).
To assess the "" program's associations with improved relationship behaviors, relationship quality, emotional regulation, and economic stability in Sierra Leone.
This non-randomized, two-group pre-test/post-test study compared = 50 pairs of caregivers and their children aged 9-13 who underwent a two-day workshop plus special home visits with = 63 pairs receiving care-as-usual. Data were collected via survey interviews with participants at baseline and endline on measures of relationship behaviors, relationship quality, emotional regulation, and economic stability.
Intervention-associated improvements included the following: caregivers talked to children more, according to child report; caregivers and children reported apologizing more; caregivers reported comforting children more; and children reported sharing their feelings more. However, intervention caregivers reported more "malicing" and smaller improvements on hostility/aggression than comparison caregivers, and intervention children reported worse performance accepting emotions. Other areas had no significant differences.
The program was associated with important improvements in caregiver-child relationship-enhancing behaviors, suggesting the promise of interventions to prevent family separation. Given other mixed and null effects, the program is being revised to strengthen other areas. Evidence on preventing children from entering residential care in LMICs is extremely lacking, despite the consensus on its importance; more investigation in this area is urgently needed.
鉴于认识到儿童有权在家庭中成长,长期以来倡导者一直呼吁采取循证干预措施,以防止儿童不必要地进入寄养机构。然而,此类项目在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)很少得到评估。
评估“”项目与改善塞拉利昂的关系行为、关系质量、情绪调节和经济稳定性之间的关联。
这项非随机、两组前后测研究比较了50对照顾者及其9至13岁的孩子,他们参加了为期两天的工作坊并接受特殊家访,与63对接受常规照料的对象进行对比。通过在基线和终期对参与者进行调查访谈,收集关于关系行为、关系质量、情绪调节和经济稳定性的测量数据。
与干预相关的改善包括:根据儿童报告,照顾者与孩子交谈更多;照顾者和孩子报告道歉更多;照顾者报告安慰孩子更多;孩子报告更多地分享自己的感受。然而,与对照组照顾者相比,干预组照顾者报告更多的“恶意”行为,且在敌意/攻击方面改善较小,干预组儿童在接受情绪方面表现更差。其他方面没有显著差异。
该项目与照顾者-儿童关系增强行为的重要改善相关,表明预防家庭分离的干预措施具有前景。鉴于其他混合和无效的效果,该项目正在修订以加强其他方面。尽管人们对防止儿童进入寄养机构的重要性已达成共识,但在低收入和中等收入国家,这方面的证据极其匮乏;迫切需要在该领域进行更多调查。