Suppr超能文献

影响美国黑人的中风种族差异。

RACIAL DISPARITIES IN STROKE AFFECTING BLACK AMERICANS.

作者信息

Cushman Mary

机构信息

Burlington, VT.

出版信息

Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2025;135:23-31.

Abstract

Stroke is the fifth leading cause of death in the United States and disproportionately affects Black Americans. The Reasons for Geographic and Racial Disparities in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort study is investigating why this disparity exists by comparing Black and White adults age 45+. Seminal findings included that higher stroke incidence in Black than in White persons, but not higher case fatality, drives the disparity. Higher prevalence of stroke risk factors in Black participants, especially hypertension and diabetes, explained 50% of the racial disparity. Elevated lipoprotein(a) was three times more frequent in Black participants and was a race-specific stroke risk factor only among Black participants. Higher interleukin-6 was a strong stroke risk factor in both Black and White participants with a hazard ratio of 2.0 for concentrations in the top versus bottom quartile. In mediation analysis, higher interleukin-6 with presence of stroke risk factors party explained the race disparity in stroke. Findings highlight the potential that prevention of stroke risk factors, treatment of higher Lp(a), and inflammation reduction have in reducing the race disparity in stroke.

摘要

中风是美国第五大死因,对美国黑人的影响尤为严重。中风地理和种族差异原因(REGARDS)队列研究正在通过比较45岁及以上的黑人和白人成年人来调查这种差异存在的原因。重要发现包括,黑人中风发病率高于白人,但病死率并不更高,这导致了这种差异。黑人参与者中中风风险因素的患病率更高,尤其是高血压和糖尿病,这解释了50%的种族差异。脂蛋白(a)升高在黑人参与者中更为常见,是黑人参与者中特有的中风风险因素。较高的白细胞介素-6在黑人和白人参与者中都是一个很强的中风风险因素,最高四分位数浓度与最低四分位数浓度相比,风险比为2.0。在中介分析中,较高的白细胞介素-6与中风风险因素共同存在部分解释了中风的种族差异。研究结果凸显了预防中风风险因素、治疗较高的脂蛋白(a)以及减轻炎症在减少中风种族差异方面的潜力。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Inflammatory cytokines and ischemic stroke risk: The REGARDS cohort.炎性细胞因子与缺血性卒中风险:REGARDS 队列研究。
Neurology. 2019 May 14;92(20):e2375-e2384. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007416. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
8
Lipoprotein(a) and Risk of Ischemic Stroke in the REGARDS Study.脂蛋白(a)与 REGARDS 研究中缺血性卒中的风险。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2019 Apr;39(4):810-818. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.118.311857.
10
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验