Woffindin C, Hoenich N A
Int J Artif Organs. 1985 Nov;8(6):313-8.
To assess the adequacy of quantifying residual formaldehyde concentrations when reusing, four semi quantitative methods of concentration estimation (Clinitest tablets, Schiff's reagent, Formalert Formotest) were compared. Two of these methods (Schiff's reagent and Clinitest) were inadequate in detecting low concentrations of formaldehyde and were associated with false positives from interference by chemicals contained in the dialysate. When using the two reagents specifically manufactured for this purpose, we also observed false positives with one (Formotest) while the other was capable of detecting formaldehyde concentrations as low as 4.5 mg/l. To minimise patients' exposure and the formation of anti-N like antibodies resulting from formaldehyde damage of red cells, it would be prudent when reusing, to select the most sensitive of these semi-quantitative techniques for routine use, to perform regular screening for anti-N antibodies and to periodically check formaldehyde levels by the use of the highly specific Hantzsch reaction.
为评估复用过程中残留甲醛浓度定量的充分性,对四种半定量浓度估算方法(尿糖试纸片、希夫试剂、福尔马林福尔莫测试)进行了比较。其中两种方法(希夫试剂和尿糖试纸片)在检测低浓度甲醛时不够充分,并且与透析液中所含化学物质的干扰导致的假阳性有关。当使用专门为此目的制造的两种试剂时,我们还观察到其中一种(福尔莫测试)出现假阳性,而另一种能够检测低至4.5毫克/升的甲醛浓度。为尽量减少患者接触以及因甲醛对红细胞造成损伤而产生抗N样抗体,复用过程中谨慎的做法是选择这些半定量技术中最敏感的方法用于常规使用,定期筛查抗N抗体,并通过使用高度特异性的汉茨希反应定期检查甲醛水平。