Suppr超能文献

家庭混乱、父母拒绝和父母控制在预测青少年执行功能方面的相互作用。

The interaction among household chaos, parental rejection, and parental control in predicting adolescent executive function.

作者信息

Hong Yelim, Folker Ann E, Deater-Deckard Kirby, Skinner Ann T, Steinberg Laurence, Bornstein Marc H, Dodge Kenneth A, Lansford Jennifer E

机构信息

Department of Educational Psychology, University of Texas at Austin.

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1037/dev0002039.

Abstract

The present study examines the interaction between household chaos, parental control, and parental rejection/acceptance (i.e., warmth) in predicting adolescent executive function (EF) skills in a diverse sample. We tested a three-way interaction to understand the direct and interactive effects of household chaos, parental control, and parental rejection/acceptance on adolescent EF within a short-term longitudinal study design. Participants were 14- to 15-year-olds and their parents ( = 220 mother-adolescent dyads, = 139 father-adolescent dyads, 48% females) from approximately equal numbers of African American (34%), Hispanic American (36%), and European American (29%) U.S. families. Mothers, fathers, and adolescents completed interviews and questionnaires, and adolescents completed EF tasks of cognitive control. Better adolescent EF was predicted by lower level household chaos, but no main effects of adolescent perceptions of control or rejection on adolescent EF were observed. For mothers, only a three-way interaction emerged among controlling behavior, rejection, and household chaos: Among mothers who showed higher levels of rejection (i.e., low warmth) toward their adolescents, the negative association between controlling behavior and adolescent EF was significant in more chaotic households. In contrast, no association between maternal controlling behavior and adolescent EF emerged in less chaotic households regardless of the extent of maternal rejection. When multiple risk factors such as maternal rejection and household chaos coexist, the detrimental impact of maternal controlling behavior on adolescent EF becomes pronounced. No similar effect emerged for fathers, suggesting that these processes may be specific to the mother-adolescent relationship. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

本研究考察了家庭混乱、父母控制以及父母拒绝/接纳(即温暖)之间的相互作用,以预测不同样本中青少年的执行功能(EF)技能。在一个短期纵向研究设计中,我们测试了一个三向交互作用,以了解家庭混乱、父母控制和父母拒绝/接纳对青少年EF的直接和交互影响。参与者是14至15岁的青少年及其父母(n = 220对母子二元组,n = 139对父子二元组,48%为女性),来自大致数量相等的非裔美国人(34%)、西班牙裔美国人(36%)和欧裔美国人(29%)美国家庭。母亲、父亲和青少年完成了访谈和问卷调查,青少年完成了认知控制的EF任务。较低水平的家庭混乱可预测更好的青少年EF,但未观察到青少年对控制或拒绝的认知对青少年EF的主效应。对于母亲而言,在控制行为、拒绝和家庭混乱之间仅出现了一个三向交互作用:在对青少年表现出较高拒绝水平(即低温暖度)的母亲中,在更混乱的家庭中,控制行为与青少年EF之间的负相关显著。相比之下,在不那么混乱的家庭中,无论母亲拒绝的程度如何,母亲的控制行为与青少年EF之间均未出现关联。当诸如母亲拒绝和家庭混乱等多种风险因素共存时,母亲控制行为对青少年EF的有害影响就会变得明显。父亲方面未出现类似效应,这表明这些过程可能特定于母子关系。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)

相似文献

2
Sex and gender as predictors for allograft and patient-relevant outcomes after kidney transplantation.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 19;12(12):CD014966. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014966.pub2.
3
Stability and Change in Gender Identity and Sexual Orientation Across Childhood and Adolescence.
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2025 Aug;90(1-3):7-172. doi: 10.1111/mono.12479.
4
Mindfulness-enhanced parenting programmes for improving the psychosocial outcomes of children (0 to 18 years) and their parents.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 10;1(1):CD012445. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012445.pub2.
5
Parent training interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD003018. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003018.pub3.
8
Parent-infant psychotherapy for improving parental and infant mental health.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 8;1(1):CD010534. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010534.pub2.
9
Maternal Depressive Symptoms and Risk for Childhood Depression: Role of Executive Functions.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2024 Oct 16. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2024.08.503.

本文引用的文献

4
Household Chaos, Parental Responses to Emotion, and Child Emotion Regulation in Middle Childhood.
Soc Dev. 2021 Aug;30(3):786-805. doi: 10.1111/sode.12500. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
5
Examining the effects of household chaos on child executive functions: A meta-analysis.
Psychol Bull. 2021 Jan;147(1):16-32. doi: 10.1037/bul0000311. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
6
The relationship between household chaos and child, parent, and family outcomes: a systematic scoping review.
BMC Public Health. 2020 Apr 22;20(1):513. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08587-8.
7
Parenting and Self-Control Across Early to Late Adolescence: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis.
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Nov;14(6):967-1005. doi: 10.1177/1745691619863046. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
8
Early student (dis)engagement: Contributions of household chaos, parenting, and self-regulatory skills.
Dev Psychol. 2019 Jul;55(7):1480-1492. doi: 10.1037/dev0000720. Epub 2019 Mar 25.
9
Assessing Executive Function in Adolescence: A Scoping Review of Existing Measures and Their Psychometric Robustness.
Front Psychol. 2019 Mar 1;10:311. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00311. eCollection 2019.
10
Parental Warmth and Hostility and Child Executive Function Problems: A Longitudinal Study of Chinese Families.
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 4;9:1063. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01063. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验