• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

考察家庭混乱对儿童执行功能的影响:一项元分析。

Examining the effects of household chaos on child executive functions: A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Neuroscience Graduate Program.

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Psychol Bull. 2021 Jan;147(1):16-32. doi: 10.1037/bul0000311. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1037/bul0000311
PMID:33151702
Abstract

Household chaos-characterized by disorganization and instability within the home-is inversely associated with child executive functioning and effortful control, although a quantitative synthesis of the findings is currently lacking. This meta-analysis incorporated 35 studies with 36 independent effect sizes including 16,480 children. Several moderators were assessed, the most fundamental involving method (i.e., informant-completed questionnaire vs. direct assessment) of assessing executive functions. The analyses revealed a significant overall effect of = .16. Only measurement approach of executive functions significantly moderated this association: Informant-completed questionnaires yielded an effect of = .23, as compared with direct assessment, = .11; however, both effects were significant. Based on substantive and statistical considerations, questionnaire and direct assessment effects were then meta-analyzed separately. Although effect sizes proved heterogeneous in the context of questionnaires, analyses revealed no significant moderators. Within direct assessment effects, both household chaos dimensions were significantly related to child executive functions, but instability was a stronger correlate ( = .17) than disorganization ( = .06). Results highlight the need for fuller investigation of differences in construct measurement presented by questionnaire and direct assessment approaches to child executive functions. At present, it appears prudent to adopt a multimethod approach to assessment. Ultimately, a greater focus on quasi-experimental designs examining the mechanisms by which events destabilize child executive functions is essential to a rigorous understanding of the relation between environmental features and child cognitive function. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

家庭混乱——以家庭内部的混乱和不稳定为特征——与儿童执行功能和努力控制呈负相关,尽管目前缺乏对这些发现的定量综合。这项荟萃分析纳入了 35 项研究,共包含 36 个独立的效应量,涉及 16480 名儿童。评估了几个调节变量,最基本的是评估执行功能的方法(即,由知情者完成的问卷与直接评估)。分析显示,总体效应显著, =.16。只有执行功能的测量方法显著调节了这种关联:知情者完成的问卷产生的效应为 =.23,而直接评估的效应为 =.11;然而,这两种效应都是显著的。基于实质性和统计方面的考虑,然后分别对问卷和直接评估的效应进行荟萃分析。尽管在问卷的背景下,效应大小存在异质性,但分析并未发现显著的调节变量。在直接评估的效应中,家庭混乱的两个维度都与儿童的执行功能显著相关,但不稳定性的相关性更强( =.17),而组织性较差( =.06)。结果强调了需要更充分地研究问卷和直接评估方法在儿童执行功能的结构测量方面呈现的差异。目前,似乎需要采用多方法评估。最终,更关注通过准实验设计研究事件使儿童执行功能不稳定的机制,对于严格理解环境特征与儿童认知功能之间的关系至关重要。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Examining the effects of household chaos on child executive functions: A meta-analysis.考察家庭混乱对儿童执行功能的影响:一项元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2021 Jan;147(1):16-32. doi: 10.1037/bul0000311. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
Effects of household chaos and parental responsiveness on child executive functions: a novel, multi-method approach.家庭混乱和父母响应性对儿童执行功能的影响:一种新颖的、多方法的研究方法。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Sep 22;9(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00651-1.
3
Socioeconomic risk moderates the link between household chaos and maternal executive function.社会经济风险缓和了家庭混乱与母亲执行功能之间的联系。
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Jun;26(3):391-399. doi: 10.1037/a0028331. Epub 2012 May 7.
4
Household chaos as a context for intergenerational transmission of executive functioning.家庭混乱作为执行功能代际传递的一种背景。
J Adolesc. 2017 Jul;58:40-48. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 8.
5
The efficacy of different interventions to foster children's executive function skills: A series of meta-analyses.不同干预措施促进儿童执行功能技能的效果:一系列元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2019 Jul;145(7):653-697. doi: 10.1037/bul0000195. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
6
Self-regulation and frontal EEG alpha activity during infancy and early childhood: A multilevel meta-analysis.自我调节与婴儿期和幼儿期的额叶 EEGα 活动:多层次荟萃分析。
Dev Sci. 2022 Nov;25(6):e13298. doi: 10.1111/desc.13298. Epub 2022 Jul 11.
7
Economic instability and household chaos relate to cortisol for children in poverty.经济不稳定和家庭混乱与贫困儿童的皮质醇有关。
J Fam Psychol. 2019 Sep;33(6):629-639. doi: 10.1037/fam0000545. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
8
Predictors of behavioral regulation in kindergarten: Household chaos, parenting, and early executive functions.幼儿园行为调节的预测因素:家庭混乱、育儿方式和早期执行功能。
Dev Psychol. 2016 Mar;52(3):430-41. doi: 10.1037/dev0000087. Epub 2016 Jan 11.
9
Family socioeconomic status and child executive functions: the roles of language, home environment, and single parenthood.家庭社会经济地位与儿童执行功能:语言、家庭环境和单亲家庭的作用。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011 Jan;17(1):120-32. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710001335. Epub 2010 Nov 15.
10
Pathways from maternal effortful control to child self-regulation: The role of maternal emotional support.从母亲的努力控制到儿童自我调节的途径:母亲情感支持的作用。
J Fam Psychol. 2017 Mar;31(2):170-180. doi: 10.1037/fam0000271. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The interaction among household chaos, parental rejection, and parental control in predicting adolescent executive function.家庭混乱、父母拒绝和父母控制在预测青少年执行功能方面的相互作用。
Dev Psychol. 2025 Aug 7. doi: 10.1037/dev0002039.
2
Emotion regulation, not executive functioning, mediates longitudinal links between unpredictability in adolescence and social connectedness in young adulthood.情绪调节而非执行功能,在青少年期的不可预测性与成年早期的社会联结之间的纵向联系中起中介作用。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 17;15(1):25961. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11579-6.
3
Why Do Migrant Children Have Poorer Mental Health Compared to Urban Children? A Network Analysis Approach.
为何流动儿童的心理健康状况比城市儿童更差?一种网络分析方法。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2025 Jul 10;18:1553-1569. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S519806. eCollection 2025.
4
Reciprocal Relationships Among Household Chaos, Parenting Stress, and Children's Behavioral Self-Regulation From Early to Middle Childhood.从幼儿期到童年中期家庭混乱、育儿压力与儿童行为自我调节之间的相互关系。
Fam Process. 2025 Jun;64(2):e70053. doi: 10.1111/famp.70053.
5
Exploring the Role of Empathy in the Association Between Early Life Adversity and Antisocial Behavior.探究同理心在早期生活逆境与反社会行为之间关联中的作用。
Affect Sci. 2024 Oct 2;6(1):128-144. doi: 10.1007/s42761-024-00280-y. eCollection 2025 Mar.
6
Conflict and Father Involvement: The Unique Role of Postpartum Destructiveness for Fathers' Direct Care in Toddlerhood.冲突与父亲参与:产后破坏性对父亲在幼儿期直接照料中的独特作用。
Fam Process. 2025 Mar;64(1):e70013. doi: 10.1111/famp.70013.
7
GenomicSEM Modelling of Diverse Executive Function GWAS Improves Gene Discovery.不同执行功能全基因组关联研究的基因组结构方程模型改进了基因发现。
Behav Genet. 2025 Mar;55(2):71-85. doi: 10.1007/s10519-025-10214-4. Epub 2025 Feb 1.
8
Cognitive Health Costs of Poor Housing for Women: Exploring Executive Function and Housing Stress in Urban Slums in India.女性居住条件差对认知健康的影响:探究印度城市贫民窟中的执行功能与住房压力
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Dec 23;21(12):1710. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21121710.
9
Household chaos, emotion regulation and social adjustment in preschool children.学龄前儿童的家庭混乱、情绪调节和社会适应。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 21;14(1):28875. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80383-5.
10
Parenting relationships as a moderator of how socioeconomic status and household chaos relate to children's cognitive and socioemotional skills.亲子关系作为社会经济地位和家庭混乱与儿童认知及社会情感技能之间关系的调节因素。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2025 Feb;250:106123. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106123. Epub 2024 Nov 16.