Storer Kieran E, Messina Jane P, Herreros-Moya Eva, Metelo Emery, Zanga Josué, Mvuama Nono M, Muzinga Soleil, Dam Rinita, Sinka Marianne, Kiskin Ivan, Everett Josh, Li Yunpeng, Roberts Stephen, Willis Katherine J
Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
School of Geography and the Environment, Oxford University Centre for the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 7;20(8):e0314122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314122. eCollection 2025.
Malaria is one of the deadliest vector borne diseases affecting sub-Saharan Africa. A suite of systems are being used to monitor and manage malaria risk and disease incidence, with an increasing focus on technological interventions that allow private citizens to remotely record and upload data. However, data collected by citizen scientists must be standardised and consistent if it is to be used for scientific analysis. Studies that aim to improve data collection quality and quantity have often included incentivisation, providing citizen scientists with monetary or other benefits for their participation in data collection. We tested whether monetary incentives enhance participation and data collection in a study trialling an acoustic mosquito sensor. Working with the community in two health areas in the Democratic Republic of Congo, we measured data collection participation, completeness, and community responses. Our results showed mixed responses to the incentive, with more participants interested in the social status and monetary value of the technology used than the monetary incentive itself. The effect of incentives on data collection varied over the course of the trial, increasing participation in the start of the trial but with no effect in the latter half of the trial. Feedback from participants showed that opinions on technology, research objectives, and incentives varied between communities, and was associated with differences in data collection quantity and quality, suggesting that differences in community interest in data collection and the incentives may be more important than the incentive value itself. These results suggest that though there is an initial benefit, extrinsic motivations do not override differences in intrinsic motivations over time, and enhanced communication and dialogue with participants may improve citizen science participation and attitudes.
疟疾是影响撒哈拉以南非洲地区的最致命的病媒传播疾病之一。目前正在使用一系列系统来监测和管理疟疾风险及疾病发病率,并且越来越关注允许公民远程记录和上传数据的技术干预措施。然而,公民科学家收集的数据若要用于科学分析,必须进行标准化且保持一致。旨在提高数据收集质量和数量的研究通常包括激励措施,为参与数据收集的公民科学家提供金钱或其他好处。在一项试用声学蚊子传感器的研究中,我们测试了金钱激励是否能提高参与度和数据收集量。我们与刚果民主共和国两个健康区域的社区合作,测量了数据收集的参与度、完整性以及社区的反应。我们的结果显示,对激励措施的反应不一,比起金钱激励本身,更多参与者对所使用技术的社会地位和金钱价值更感兴趣。在试验过程中,激励措施对数据收集的影响有所不同,在试验开始时提高了参与度,但在试验后半段则没有效果。参与者的反馈表明,不同社区对技术、研究目标和激励措施的看法各不相同,并且与数据收集的数量和质量差异相关,这表明社区对数据收集的兴趣差异和激励措施可能比激励措施本身的价值更重要。这些结果表明,尽管最初有好处,但随着时间的推移,外在动机并不能超越内在动机的差异,加强与参与者的沟通和对话可能会提高公民科学的参与度和态度。