Den Broeder Lea, Devilee Jeroen, Van Oers Hans, Schuit A Jantine, Wagemakers Annemarie
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Health Promot Int. 2018 Jun 1;33(3):505-514. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daw086.
Community engagement in public health policy is easier said than done. One reason is that public health policy is produced in a complex process resulting in policies that may appear not to link up to citizen perspectives. We therefore address the central question as to whether citizen engagement in knowledge production could enable inclusive health policy making. Building on non-health work fields, we describe different types of citizen engagement in scientific research, or 'Citizen Science'. We describe the challenges that Citizen Science poses for public health, and how these could be addressed. Despite these challenges, we expect that Citizen Science or similar approaches such as participatory action research and 'popular epidemiology' may yield better knowledge, empowered communities, and improved community health. We provide a draft framework to enable evaluation of Citizen Science in practice, consisting of a descriptive typology of different kinds of Citizen Science and a causal framework that shows how Citizen Science in public health might benefit both the knowledge produced as well as the 'Citizen Scientists' as active participants.
社区参与公共卫生政策说起来容易做起来难。一个原因是,公共卫生政策是在一个复杂的过程中制定出来的,其结果是政策可能看起来与公民的观点没有联系。因此,我们要解决一个核心问题,即公民参与知识生产是否能够促成包容性的卫生政策制定。基于非卫生工作领域,我们描述了公民参与科学研究的不同类型,即 “公民科学”。我们阐述了公民科学给公共卫生带来的挑战,以及如何应对这些挑战。尽管存在这些挑战,但我们预计公民科学或类似方法,如参与式行动研究和 “大众流行病学”,可能会产生更好的知识、增强社区权能并改善社区健康。我们提供了一个框架草案,以便在实践中对公民科学进行评估,该框架包括不同类型公民科学的描述性类型学,以及一个因果框架,展示了公共卫生领域的公民科学如何既能使所产生的知识受益,又能使作为积极参与者的 “公民科学家” 受益。