Flynn Rachel M, Han Y Catherine, Kaat Aaron J, Mansolf Maxwell, Dworak Elizabeth M, Pila Sarah, Yao Lihua, Carlson Stephanie M, Oakes Lisa M, Gershon Richard C, Zelazo Philip David
Department of Child and Adolescent Development, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Infant Behav Dev. 2025 Sep;80:102118. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2025.102118. Epub 2025 Aug 6.
Existing standardized assessments of Executive Function and Memory (EF-Mem) for infants and toddlers tend to be limited in scope, can be burdensome to administer, and/or do not often utilize modern technology. Here, we describe the development and validation of the novel iPad-based EF-Mem measures in the NIH Baby Toolbox® for infants and young children 1-42 months old. English and Spanish versions of gaze-based (Familiarization) and touch-based measures (Mullen Visual Reception, Visual Delayed Response, Delayed Memory Task) were adapted for iPad administration. A nationally representative sample of children (N = 2515 recruited; N = 2448 who completed at least one EF-Mem measure; n = 1993 English, n = 455 Spanish) were administered the Baby Toolbox EF-Mem measures as part of the full battery of Baby Toolbox measures. Most caregivers completed the Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3rd edition (ASQ-3), and separate subsets of children were administered the Bayley Scales for Infant Development 4th Edition (Bayley-4, n = 120 recruited; n = 117 that completed both EF-Mem and the Bayley-4) or were administered the Baby Toolbox battery again 1-14 days later to assess test-retest reliability (n = 220 recruited; n = 187 who completed any EF-Mem measure twice). Measure-level scores showed expected correlations with age for gaze and touch measures. EF-Mem scores showed expected correlations with the Bayley-4 for both gaze and touch, indicating convergent validity, and varied meaningfully based on the ASQ-3 classifications. Test-retest reliability for all measures and empirical reliability of the touch scores were moderate. Automatic coding and scoring, ease of administration, reliability, and validity of Baby Toolbox EF-Mem make these measures valuable for developmental assessment.
现有的针对婴幼儿的执行功能和记忆(EF-Mem)标准化评估在范围上往往有限,实施起来可能很繁琐,而且/或者不常使用现代技术。在此,我们描述了美国国立卫生研究院婴儿工具箱(NIH Baby Toolbox®)中针对1至42个月大婴幼儿的基于iPad的新型EF-Mem测量方法的开发与验证。基于注视(熟悉度)和基于触摸的测量方法(穆伦视觉接受度、视觉延迟反应、延迟记忆任务)的英文和西班牙文版本被改编用于iPad实施。抽取了一个具有全国代表性的儿童样本(招募了N = 2515名;完成至少一项EF-Mem测量的有N = 2448名;n = 1993名说英语,n = 455名说西班牙语),作为婴儿工具箱全套测量的一部分,对他们实施了婴儿工具箱EF-Mem测量。大多数照料者完成了第三版年龄与发育阶段问卷(ASQ-3),并且有单独的儿童子集接受了第四版贝利婴儿发育量表(贝利-4,招募了n = 120名;完成了EF-Mem测量和贝利-4测量的有n = 117名),或者在1至14天后再次接受婴儿工具箱全套测量以评估重测信度(招募了n = 220名;完成任何一项EF-Mem测量两次的有n = 187名)。测量水平得分显示,注视和触摸测量与年龄呈现出预期的相关性。EF-Mem得分在注视和触摸方面与贝利-4均呈现出预期的相关性,表明具有收敛效度,并且根据ASQ-3分类有显著差异。所有测量的重测信度以及触摸得分的实证信度均为中等。婴儿工具箱EF-Mem的自动编码和评分、易于实施、信度和效度,使得这些测量方法对于发育评估具有重要价值。