• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响胃癌幸存者低健康相关生活质量及健康问题的因素:一项倾向得分匹配的全国性研究。

Factors Affecting Low Health-Related Quality of Life and Health Issues in Gastric Cancer Survivors: A Propensity Score-Matched, Nationwide Study.

作者信息

Jeon Han Jo, Choi Hyuk Soon, Lee Jae Min, Kim Eun Sun, Keum Bora, Jeen Yoon Tae, Lee Hong Sik, Chun Hoon Jai, Jeong Yujin

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Department of Biostatistics, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Sep;40(9):2219-2230. doi: 10.1111/jgh.70000. Epub 2025 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1111/jgh.70000
PMID:40774938
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12400252/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

This study evaluated the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of Korean gastric cancer survivors (GCSs) aged ≥ 19 years using preference-based measurements with a converted health utility index.

METHODS

Data from the fourth to eighth cycles of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) from 2007 to 2020 were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to mitigate baseline covariate imbalances between the GCS group and the non-GCS group. The EuroQol (EQ)-5D-3L questionnaire and EQ-5D index were used to evaluate the HRQoL of five GCSs.

RESULTS

A total of 113 091 individuals participated in the screening program. PSM found the HRQoL of the GCS group (535; 16.67%) to be significantly lower than that of the non-GCS group (2675; 83.33%) (EQ-5D index: 0.904 vs. 0.917, p = 0.039). The EQ-5D index significantly decreased by 0.014 for every increase in the GCS score (p = 0.027, 95% CI -0.02 to -0.002). Patients with activity limitation had the highest probability of experiencing issues in performing usual activities (odds ratio 8.321; 95% CI 3.707-18.678). Participants with positive subjective health perceptions had a decreased likelihood of experiencing problems (odds ratio 0.149-0.406). Factors that influenced the EQ-5D index of GCSs included activity limitation, subjective health perception, age, and sex.

CONCLUSIONS

The matched cohort revealed that Korean GCSs had significantly lower HRQoL than the non-GCS population. To enhance the HRQoL of GCSs, alleviating activity limitations and improving subjective health perception simultaneously are paramount.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究使用转换后的健康效用指数,通过基于偏好的测量方法,评估了年龄≥19岁的韩国胃癌幸存者(GCSs)的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。

方法

分析了2007年至2020年韩国国家健康与营养检查调查(KNHANES)第四至第八轮的数据。进行倾向得分匹配(PSM)以减轻GCS组和非GCS组之间的基线协变量不平衡。使用欧洲五维度健康量表(EQ)-5D-3L问卷和EQ-5D指数来评估5个GCSs的HRQoL。

结果

共有113091人参与了筛查项目。PSM发现GCS组(535人;16.67%)的HRQoL显著低于非GCS组(2675人;83.33%)(EQ-5D指数:0.904对0.917,p = 0.039)。GCS得分每增加1分,EQ-5D指数显著下降0.014(p = 0.027,95%置信区间-0.02至-0.002)。活动受限的患者在进行日常活动时出现问题的概率最高(优势比8.321;95%置信区间3.707 - 18.678)。主观健康认知为积极的参与者出现问题的可能性降低(优势比0.149 - 0.406)。影响GCSs的EQ-5D指数的因素包括活动受限、主观健康认知、年龄和性别。

结论

匹配队列显示,韩国GCSs的HRQoL显著低于非GCS人群。为提高GCSs的HRQoL,同时减轻活动受限和改善主观健康认知至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f53/12400252/9565ea31925d/JGH-40-2219-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f53/12400252/9565ea31925d/JGH-40-2219-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f53/12400252/9565ea31925d/JGH-40-2219-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors Affecting Low Health-Related Quality of Life and Health Issues in Gastric Cancer Survivors: A Propensity Score-Matched, Nationwide Study.影响胃癌幸存者低健康相关生活质量及健康问题的因素:一项倾向得分匹配的全国性研究。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Sep;40(9):2219-2230. doi: 10.1111/jgh.70000. Epub 2025 Aug 7.
2
Aphasia-specific or generic outcomes? a comparison of two health-related quality of life instruments for economic evaluations of aphasia treatments.失语症特异性结果还是一般性结果?两种用于失语症治疗经济评估的健康相关生活质量工具的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2025 Jul 26. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04040-8.
3
Association between in-hospital frailty and health-related quality of life after stroke: the Nor-COAST study.住院衰弱与卒中后健康相关生活质量的关联:Nor-COAST 研究。
BMC Neurol. 2021 Mar 4;21(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s12883-021-02128-5.
4
Cancer-specific utility: clinical validation of the EORTC QLU-C10D in patients with glioblastoma.癌症特异性效用:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量核心问卷-脑肿瘤10项简表(EORTC QLU-C10D)在胶质母细胞瘤患者中的临床验证
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Nov 20. doi: 10.1007/s10198-024-01729-4.
5
A life that's worth living - measuring health-related quality of life among people treated for tuberculosis in Viet Nam: a longitudinal EQ-5D-5L survey.值得过的生活——衡量越南结核病患者的健康相关生活质量:一项纵向EQ-5D-5L调查
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Apr 23;23(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02369-9.
6
Tirzepatide and health-related quality of life in adults with obesity or overweight: Results from the SURMOUNT-3 phase 3 randomized trial.替尔泊肽与肥胖或超重成人的健康相关生活质量:SURMOUNT-3 三期随机试验结果
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 May 14. doi: 10.1111/dom.16463.
7
Handgrip strength, dynapenia, and health-related quality of life in older Korean adults.韩国老年人的握力、肌肉减少症与健康相关生活质量
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Aug 14;25(1):627. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06218-8.
8
Association between out-of-pocket expenditure and health-related quality of life among patients receiving cancer treatment: a cross-sectional study from Nepal.接受癌症治疗患者的自付费用与健康相关生活质量之间的关联:一项来自尼泊尔的横断面研究。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2025 Jul 15;23(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12955-025-02404-9.
9
The impact of biological interventions for ulcerative colitis on health-related quality of life.溃疡性结肠炎生物干预措施对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 22;2015(9):CD008655. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008655.pub3.
10
Sociodemographic factors associated with health-related quality of life in UK healthcare workers: a cross-sectional study.英国医护人员健康相关生活质量的社会人口学因素:一项横断面研究。
BMC Med. 2025 Jul 22;23(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12916-025-04208-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review reveals that EQ-5D minimally important differences vary with treatment type and may decrease with increasing baseline score.系统评价显示,EQ-5D 最小重要差异随治疗类型而变化,且可能随基线评分的升高而降低。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Oct;174:111487. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111487. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
The Ceiling Effects of EQ-5D-3L and 5L in General Population Health Surveys: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.EQ-5D-3L 和 5L 在一般人群健康调查中的天花板效应:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Value Health. 2024 Jul;27(7):986-997. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.02.018. Epub 2024 Mar 10.
3
Long-term late effects in older gastric cancer survivors: Survival analysis using Cox hazard regression model by retrospective electronic health records.
老年胃癌幸存者的长期迟发效应:回顾性电子健康记录的 Cox 风险回归模型生存分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Dec 15;32(1):29. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-08202-7.
4
Association between physical activity and health-related quality of life in middle-aged and elderly individuals with musculoskeletal disorders: Findings from a national cross-sectional study in Korea.体力活动与中老年骨骼肌肉障碍患者健康相关生活质量的关系:来自韩国全国性横断面研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 16;18(11):e0294602. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294602. eCollection 2023.
5
Patient-reported outcome measures for assessing health-related quality of life in people with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.患者报告结局测量在评估 2 型糖尿病患者健康相关生活质量中的应用:一项系统评价。
Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2022 Oct;23(5):931-977. doi: 10.1007/s11154-022-09734-9. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
6
Systematic review of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) issues associated with gastric cancer: capturing cross-cultural differences.系统评价与胃癌相关的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)问题:捕捉跨文化差异。
Gastric Cancer. 2022 Jul;25(4):665-677. doi: 10.1007/s10120-022-01309-6. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
7
Association of Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Cancer Drug Trials With Survival Outcomes and Drug Class.癌症药物试验中生存结局和药物类别的质量调整生命年结果的相关性。
JAMA Oncol. 2022 Jun 1;8(6):879-886. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0864.
8
Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries.《全球癌症统计数据 2020:全球 185 个国家和地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率估计》。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 May;71(3):209-249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
9
Patient-Reported Outcomes as Independent Prognostic Factors for Survival in Oncology: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.患者报告结局作为肿瘤学中生存的独立预后因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Value Health. 2021 Feb;24(2):250-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.10.017. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
10
The association between subjective health perception and lifestyle factors in Shiga prefecture, Japan: a cross-sectional study.日本滋贺县主观健康感知与生活方式因素的关联:一项横断面研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 25;20(1):1786. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09911-y.