Zelada Sandro Ricardo Benites, Leão Renata Vidal, da Silva Andre Giardino Moreira, Lobo Carlos Felipe Teixeira, Godoy-Santos Alexandre Leme, Helito Paulo Victor Partezani, Helito Camilo Partezani, Gobbi Riccardo Gomes
Knee Group, Institute of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Hawkins Drive, 200, Iowa City, IA, 52242, USA.
Skeletal Radiol. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s00256-025-05011-3.
To evaluate the ability of weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT) to detect and quantify differences in anterior tibial translation (ATT) and tibiofemoral rotation (TFR) between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured and uninjured knees in patients with chronic ACL tears.
This prospective, observational study included 20 patients (40 knees) with chronic unilateral ACL injuries confirmed by clinical exam and MRI. Knee WBCT was performed in four standardized positions: full extension and 30° flexion (bipodal), and internal and external rotation (unipodal). ATT was measured in medial and lateral compartments. TFR was assessed using two angular parameters: femorotibial rotation angle (TFR 1) and trochlear groove-patellar tendon angle (TFR 2). Intra- and inter-observer reliability was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs).
WBCT detected significant differences in ATT and TFR between injured and uninjured knees during bipodal loading. At 30° flexion, lateral ATT was greater in injured knees (7.9 ± 3.8 mm vs. 4.7 ± 2.0 mm, p = 0.001), as was medial ATT (2.9 ± 2.9 mm vs. 0.8 ± 1.4 mm, p = 0.007). TFR 1 was increased (10.9° ± 6.3° vs. 7.6° ± 4.6°, p < 0.001), while TFR 2 was decreased (12.3° ± 7.2° vs. 17.3° ± 6.1°, p = 0.004). Similar trends were seen in full extension. Under unipodal loading, only lateral ATT remained significantly elevated. All measures showed good to excellent reliability (ICC > 0.7).
WBCT enables objective quantification of ATT and TFR differences in chronic ACL injury and may support biomechanical assessment in clinical practice.
评估负重计算机断层扫描(WBCT)检测和量化慢性前交叉韧带(ACL)撕裂患者中ACL损伤膝关节与未损伤膝关节之间胫骨前移(ATT)和胫股旋转(TFR)差异的能力。
这项前瞻性观察性研究纳入了20例患者(40个膝关节),这些患者经临床检查和MRI确诊为慢性单侧ACL损伤。在四个标准化位置进行膝关节WBCT检查:完全伸直和30°屈曲(双足支撑),以及内旋和外旋(单足支撑)。在内侧和外侧间室测量ATT。使用两个角度参数评估TFR:股胫旋转角(TFR 1)和滑车沟-髌腱角(TFR 2)。使用组内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者内和观察者间的可靠性。
在双足支撑负重期间,WBCT检测到损伤膝关节与未损伤膝关节之间的ATT和TFR存在显著差异。在30°屈曲时,损伤膝关节的外侧ATT更大(7.9±3.8mm对4.7±2.0mm,p = 0.001),内侧ATT也是如此(2.9±2.9mm对0.8±1.4mm,p = 0.007)。TFR 1增加(10.9°±6.3°对7.6°±4.6°,p < 0.001),而TFR 2降低(12.3°±7.2°对17.3°±6.1°,p = 0.004)。在完全伸直时也观察到类似趋势。在单足支撑负重下,仅外侧ATT仍显著升高。所有测量结果均显示出良好至极好的可靠性(ICC>0.7)。
WBCT能够客观量化慢性ACL损伤中ATT和TFR的差异,并可能支持临床实践中的生物力学评估。