• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对140例因假体周围关节感染和无菌性松动而接受翻修全膝关节置换术的患者进行微生物学分析:液滴数字PCR分析。

Microbiologic analysis of 140 patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty due to periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening: droplet digital PCR analysis.

作者信息

Liu Xiao-Kai, Zhao Heng-Xin, Ding Lan-Feng, Wang Yuan-He, Tian Shao-Qi

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, 266071, Shandong, China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 7;20(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06160-w.

DOI:10.1186/s13018-025-06160-w
PMID:40775645
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The primary reasons for postoperative joint prosthesis revision after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) are periprosthetic aseptic prosthesis loosening and joint infection (PJI). The objective of this study is to analyze the predominant microbial species responsible for PJI while also discussing was related.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent TKA revision surgery for the treatment of PJI and aseptic loosening of joint prostheses at our institution. Patients with aseptic loosening of the prosthesis are group A (n = 68), and patients with PJI are group B (n = 72). The fluid obtained after ultrasonic treatment was then subjected to microbial culture. Droplet Digital PCR (ddPCR) analysis was employed for DNA detection.

RESULTS

In our study, we included a total of 140 patients divided into groups A (patients with aseptic loosening of the prosthesis) and B (patients with PJI). The microbial culture results showed that 30 patients (45.45%) had Staphylococcus aureus infections, and 24 patients (36.36%) had methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections in group B. The DNA testing results revealed that 54.41% (n = 37) of Group A patients still had microbial infections, including both Gram-positive and Gram-negative species. Notably, these patients showed negative microbial cultures but positive DNA detection. Among them, 83.78% (n = 31) had Gram-negative infections, while 16.22% (n = 6) had Gram-positive infections. In Group B, 66 patients (91.67%) had predominantly Gram-positive infections.

CONCLUSION

This study innovatively employed ddPCR for DNA detection and microbiologic analysis in 140 patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty due to periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening, showed that most patients with PJI mainly affected by infections caused by high-virulence Gram-positive microbe, especially Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA. On the other hand, patients with aseptic loosening of the prosthesis may be associated with a history of multiple low-virulence microbial infections, primarily involving Gram-negative bacteria.

摘要

目的

全膝关节置换术(TKA)后关节假体翻修的主要原因是假体周围无菌性松动和关节感染(PJI)。本研究的目的是分析导致PJI的主要微生物种类,并讨论相关问题。

方法

对在我院接受TKA翻修手术以治疗PJI和关节假体无菌性松动的患者进行回顾性分析。假体无菌性松动患者为A组(n = 68),PJI患者为B组(n = 72)。然后将超声处理后获得的液体进行微生物培养。采用液滴数字PCR(ddPCR)分析进行DNA检测。

结果

在我们的研究中,共纳入140例患者,分为A组(假体无菌性松动患者)和B组(PJI患者)。微生物培养结果显示,B组中30例患者(45.45%)感染金黄色葡萄球菌,24例患者(36.36%)感染耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)。DNA检测结果显示,A组54.41%(n = 37)的患者仍有微生物感染,包括革兰氏阳性菌和革兰氏阴性菌。值得注意的是,这些患者微生物培养呈阴性,但DNA检测呈阳性。其中,83.78%(n = 31)为革兰氏阴性菌感染,16.22%(n = 6)为革兰氏阳性菌感染。B组中,66例患者(91.67%)主要为革兰氏阳性菌感染。

结论

本研究创新性地将ddPCR用于140例因假体周围关节感染和无菌性松动而接受翻修全膝关节置换术患者的DNA检测和微生物学分析,结果显示,大多数PJI患者主要受高毒力革兰氏阳性微生物感染,尤其是金黄色葡萄球菌和MRSA。另一方面,假体无菌性松动患者可能与多种低毒力微生物感染史有关,主要涉及革兰氏阴性菌。

相似文献

1
Microbiologic analysis of 140 patients undergoing revision total knee arthroplasty due to periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic loosening: droplet digital PCR analysis.对140例因假体周围关节感染和无菌性松动而接受翻修全膝关节置换术的患者进行微生物学分析:液滴数字PCR分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Aug 7;20(1):740. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06160-w.
2
Is 18 F-fluoride PET/CT an Accurate Tool to Diagnose Loosening After Total Joint Arthroplasty?18F-氟化物PET/CT是诊断全关节置换术后假体松动的准确工具吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):415-428. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003228. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
3
What Are the Functional, Radiographic, and Survivorship Outcomes of a Modified Cup-cage Technique for Pelvic Discontinuity?改良杯笼技术治疗骨盆不连续性的功能、影像学和生存结果如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2149-2160. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003186. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
4
How Often Does Bacteremia Occur in Patients With Chronic Periprosthetic Joint Infection? A Prospective, Observational Study.慢性人工关节感染患者菌血症的发生频率如何?一项前瞻性观察性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 21;483(7):1206-14. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003367.
5
Organism profiles and empirical treatments for periprosthetic joint infections.人工关节感染的病原体概况及经验性治疗
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 25;20(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06007-4.
6
Static Versus Articulating Spacer: Does Infectious Pathogen Type Affect Treatment Success?静态与活动间隔物:感染病原体类型是否影响治疗成功率?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Oct 1;482(10):1850-1855. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003075. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
7
Reinfection Patterns Following Two-Stage Exchange for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Retrospective Analysis.人工关节感染两阶段翻修术后的再感染模式:一项回顾性分析
J Arthroplasty. 2025 Aug;40(8):1961-1966. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.02.068. Epub 2025 Feb 28.
8
Can Periprosthetic Joint Infection of Tumor Prostheses Be Controlled With Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention?肿瘤假体周围关节感染能否通过清创、抗生素治疗和保留植入物来控制?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):49-58. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003184. Epub 2024 Jul 8.
9
How Often Is Rifampin Therapy Initiated and Completed in Patients With Periprosthetic Joint Infections?人工关节周围感染患者中利福平治疗的起始和完成频率如何?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 23. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003377.
10
Utility of intraoperative frozen section histopathology in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.术中冰冻切片组织病理学在假体周围关节感染诊断中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 19;94(18):1700-11. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.J.00756.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk of infection and conversion time from external to definitive fixation in open tibial fracture.开放性胫骨骨折的感染风险及从外固定转换为确定性固定的时间
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 23;19(1):867. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05350-2.
2
Risk factors for surgical site infection after patellar fracture surgery in the elderly.老年人髌骨骨折手术后手术部位感染的危险因素。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 18;19(1):830. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05335-1.
3
Biofilm and the effect of sonication in a chronic Staphylococcus epidermidis orthopedic in vivo implant infection model.
生物膜以及超声处理在慢性表皮葡萄球菌骨科体内植入物感染模型中的作用
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Dec 4;19(1):820. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05309-3.
4
Risk factors for deep surgical site infections following orthopedic trauma surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.骨科创伤手术后深部手术部位感染的危险因素:荟萃分析和系统评价。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 30;19(1):811. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05299-2.
5
The association between interleukin-8 gene polymorphism and the risk of sepsis in older adults.白细胞介素-8 基因多态性与老年人脓毒症风险的关系。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Nov 28;19(1):804. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05296-5.
6
In-hospital mortality of patients with periprosthetic joint infection.人工关节周围感染患者的院内死亡率。
Bone Jt Open. 2024 Apr 26;5(4):367-373. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.54.BJO-2023-0162.R1.
7
High treatment failure rate in haematogenous compared to non-haematogenous periprosthetic joint infection.血液源性假体周围关节感染的治疗失败率高于非血液源性假体周围关节感染。
Bone Joint J. 2023 Dec 1;105-B(12):1294-1302. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.105B12.BJJ-2023-0454.R1.
8
HexAI-TJAtxt: A textual dataset to advance open scientific research in total joint arthroplasty.HexAI-TJAtxt:一个用于推动全关节置换术开放科学研究的文本数据集。
Data Brief. 2023 Oct 31;51:109738. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2023.109738. eCollection 2023 Dec.
9
How We Approach Suppressive Antibiotic Therapy Following Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention for Prosthetic Joint Infection.清创、使用抗生素及保留植入物治疗人工关节感染后,我们如何进行抑制性抗生素治疗。
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Jan 25;78(1):188-198. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciad484.
10
Novel diagnostic markers for periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review.用于假体周围关节感染的新型诊断标志物:系统评价。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2023 Jul 17;13:1210345. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1210345. eCollection 2023.