Chen Yixin, Sarnthiyakul Sasithorn, Michel Sophie K F, Wu Chuyue, Hauner Hans, von Ehrenstein Ondine S, Liu Jihong, Chen Liwei
Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Institute of Nutritional Medicine, School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Nutr J. 2025 Aug 7;24(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12937-025-01182-w.
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the relationship between energy intake (EI) and physical activity (PA) during pregnancy and gestational weight gain (GWG) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
RCTs measuring EI and PA at least twice and total GWG during pregnancy were eligible. To synthesize PA measures reported on different scales, standardized mean change per day (SMC/day) were obtained by dividing the change in PA by the standard deviation of the change. We estimated mean changes in EI, PA, and mean total GWG across studies, accounting for clustering within studies. One-stage dose-response meta-analyses (DRMA) quantified the additional GWG associated with changes in EI and PA during pregnancy.
A total of 21 RCTs with 7,705 participants were included. The mean total GWG was 11.99 kg (95% CI: 11.05 kg to 12.94 kg). The mean baseline EI was 1977 kcal/day across studies (range: 1652 to 2777 kcal/day) and the mean increase in EI throughout pregnancy was 132 kcal/day (95% CI: 54 to 209 kcal/day). The average change in PA during pregnancy was - 0.11 SMC/day (95% CI: -0.33 to 0.12 SMC/day). DRMA indicated 0.30 kg additional weight gain per 100 kcal/day increase in EI (95% CI: -0.01 kg to 0.60 kg, P = 0.06). The effect size was greater in studies with low risk of bias vs. high risk of bias (0.57 vs. -0.20 kg, P for difference = 0.02). DRMA showed 0.24 kg less weight gain per 0.25 SMC/day increase in PA (-0.50 to 0.02 kg, P = 0.07).
Average GWG often exceeds recommendations of current guidelines, particularly among women with overweight/obesity (OWOB), while average increases in EI were below current recommendations, and PA levels were frequently observed to decrease. DRMA further suggests that GWG may be modifiable through changes in EI and PA with greater EI increases or PA reductions linked to greater GWG, especially among women with OW/OB. Despite challenges in precisely quantifying these associations, integrated findings from this comprehensive systematic review and subgroup/sensitivity analyses highlight the need for more individualized nutrition and exercise recommendations and may warrant revisiting current guidelines.
本系统评价和荟萃分析旨在量化随机对照试验(RCT)中孕期能量摄入(EI)与身体活动(PA)以及孕期体重增加(GWG)之间的关系。
纳入在孕期至少测量两次EI和PA以及总GWG的RCT。为了综合不同量表报告的PA测量值,通过将PA的变化除以变化的标准差获得每日标准化平均变化(SMC/天)。我们估计了各项研究中EI、PA的平均变化以及平均总GWG,并考虑了研究中的聚类情况。单阶段剂量反应荟萃分析(DRMA)量化了孕期EI和PA变化与额外GWG之间的关联。
共纳入21项RCT,涉及7705名参与者。平均总GWG为11.99kg(95%CI:11.05kg至12.94kg)。各项研究中基线EI的平均值为1977kcal/天(范围:1652至2777kcal/天),孕期EI的平均增加量为132kcal/天(95%CI:54至209kcal/天)。孕期PA的平均变化为-0.11 SMC/天(95%CI:-0.33至0.12 SMC/天)。DRMA表明,EI每增加100kcal/天,体重额外增加0.30kg(95%CI:-0.01kg至0.60kg,P = 0.06)。与高偏倚风险研究相比,低偏倚风险研究中的效应量更大(0.57 vs. -0.20kg,差异P = 0.02)。DRMA显示,PA每增加0.25 SMC/天,体重增加减少0.24kg(-0.50至0.02kg,P = 0.07)。
平均GWG常常超过当前指南的建议,尤其是在超重/肥胖(OWOB)女性中,而EI的平均增加量低于当前建议,且经常观察到PA水平下降。DRMA进一步表明,GWG可能通过EI和PA的变化进行调整,EI增加或PA减少幅度越大,与GWG增加幅度越大相关,尤其是在OW/OB女性中。尽管在精确量化这些关联方面存在挑战,但这项全面系统评价以及亚组/敏感性分析的综合结果凸显了制定更个性化营养和运动建议的必要性,可能有必要重新审视当前指南。