• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与固定轴螺钉和多轴螺钉相比,单平面椎弓根螺钉治疗胸腰椎椎体骨折的临床和影像学结果的回顾性分析。

Retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures treated with monoplanar pedicle screws compared with fixed-axis and polyaxial screws.

作者信息

Duan Wei, Zhao Xin, Chang Le, Sun Zhen, Lai Kangwei, Zhang Jingchun, Tian Buqi, Ye Zhengxu

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Department of Aerospace Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 24;12:1605583. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1605583. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1605583
PMID:40776923
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12328457/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pedicle screw fixation is widely utilized in thoracolumbar fractures to restore vertebral height and spinal alignment. Screw head design varies among fixed-axis (rigid), polyaxial (multiplanar mobility), and monoplanar (coronal mobility) types, impacting surgical outcomes. This study compares clinical and radiological outcomes of these screws.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients (2020-2024) with thoracolumbar fractures were divided into three groups: Group A (fixed-axis screws,  = 31), Group B (polyaxial screws,  = 19), and Group C (monoplanar screws,  = 25). Operative time, blood loss, radiographic parameters (anterior body compression index, vertebral body angle, regional Cobb angle), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were assessed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 3 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Group C (monoplanar) demonstrated significantly lower blood loss (64 ± 11.1 mL vs. 308.6 ± 88.8 mL,  < 0.05) and shorter operative time (88 ± 8.2 min vs. 158.9 ± 27.8 min,  < 0.05) than Group A, with no significant differences compared to Group B. Postoperative VAS improved across all groups ( < 0.05), though Group A had slightly higher scores. Radiographic correction loss occurred in all groups at 12 months ( < 0.05), but was more pronounced in Group B. No complications (infection, nerve injury) were observed.

CONCLUSION

Monoplanar pedicle screws, combining coronal mobility for minimally invasive placement and sagittal rigidity for stability, reduce blood loss and operative time compared to fixed-axis screws while maintaining comparable correction retention to polyaxial screws. These findings position monoplanar screws as a balanced option for thoracolumbar fracture fixation, optimizing minimally invasive benefits without compromising mechanical strength.

摘要

背景

椎弓根螺钉固定术在胸腰椎骨折中被广泛应用,以恢复椎体高度和脊柱排列。螺钉头部设计在固定轴(刚性)、多轴(多平面活动)和单平面(冠状面活动)类型之间有所不同,影响手术效果。本研究比较了这些螺钉的临床和放射学结果。

方法

将75例(2020 - 2024年)胸腰椎骨折患者分为三组:A组(固定轴螺钉,n = 31)、B组(多轴螺钉,n = 19)和C组(单平面螺钉,n = 25)。在术前、术后以及3个月和12个月时评估手术时间、失血量、影像学参数(椎体前缘压缩指数、椎体角度、节段Cobb角)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)。

结果

C组(单平面)与A组相比,失血量显著更低(64±11.1 mL对308.6±88.8 mL,P<0.05),手术时间更短(88±8.2分钟对158.9±27.8分钟,P<0.05),与B组相比无显著差异。所有组术后VAS均有改善(P<0.05),尽管A组评分略高。所有组在12个月时均出现影像学矫正丢失(P<0.05),但在B组中更明显。未观察到并发症(感染、神经损伤)。

结论

单平面椎弓根螺钉结合了用于微创置入的冠状面活动和用于稳定性的矢状面刚性,与固定轴螺钉相比,减少了失血量和手术时间,同时与多轴螺钉保持相当的矫正维持效果。这些发现表明单平面螺钉是胸腰椎骨折固定的一个平衡选择,在不影响机械强度的情况下优化了微创益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042e/12328457/e311862bc261/fmed-12-1605583-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042e/12328457/7989a84ed5ab/fmed-12-1605583-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042e/12328457/f6ae89c06f72/fmed-12-1605583-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042e/12328457/e311862bc261/fmed-12-1605583-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042e/12328457/7989a84ed5ab/fmed-12-1605583-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042e/12328457/f6ae89c06f72/fmed-12-1605583-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042e/12328457/e311862bc261/fmed-12-1605583-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures treated with monoplanar pedicle screws compared with fixed-axis and polyaxial screws.与固定轴螺钉和多轴螺钉相比,单平面椎弓根螺钉治疗胸腰椎椎体骨折的临床和影像学结果的回顾性分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 24;12:1605583. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1605583. eCollection 2025.
2
Novel Screw Head Design of Pedicle Screw for Reducing the Correction Loss in the Patients With Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures: A Biomechanical Study.用于减少胸腰椎骨折患者矫正丢失的新型椎弓根螺钉头部设计:一项生物力学研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2017 Apr 1;42(7):E379-E384. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001808.
3
A comparative study of robot-assisted navigation versus C-arm fluoroscopy in percutaneous pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractures.机器人辅助导航与C型臂透视在经皮椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰椎骨折中的对比研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 26;15(1):27214. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-12549-8.
4
Is anterior fusion still necessary in patients with neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures? A systematic review and meta-analysis.对于神经功能完好的胸腰椎爆裂骨折患者,前路融合术是否仍有必要?一项系统评价与Meta分析。
Neurocirugia (Engl Ed). 2025 Mar-Apr;36(2):112-128. doi: 10.1016/j.neucie.2024.11.006. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
5
The Mini-Open Wiltse Approach with Pedicle Screw Fixation Versus Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation for Treatment of Neurologically Intact Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮椎弓根螺钉固定与微创 Wiltse 入路椎弓根螺钉固定治疗神经功能正常的胸腰椎骨折:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug;164:310-322. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.05.119. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
6
Percutaneous Reduction and Fixation for Traumatic Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fracture Using a Monoaxial Screw System.使用单轴螺钉系统对创伤性胸腰椎椎体骨折进行经皮复位与固定
Cureus. 2025 May 26;17(5):e84815. doi: 10.7759/cureus.84815. eCollection 2025 May.
7
Percutaneous monoplanar screws versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws in intermediate screw fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a case-control study.经皮单平面螺钉与混合固定轴向和多轴向螺钉治疗创伤性胸腰椎爆裂骨折中的中间螺钉固定:一项病例对照研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 22;19(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04547-9.
8
Comparison of monoplanar and polyaxial screw fixation systems in percutaneous intermediate fixation for thoracolumbar fractures.经皮微创治疗胸腰椎骨折中单平面螺钉与多轴螺钉固定系统的比较。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Feb 22;23(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05129-8.
9
Sagittal Angle of Pedicle Screws as a Influencing Factor for Postoperative Collapse of Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Case-control Study.椎弓根螺钉矢状角作为胸腰椎骨折术后塌陷的影响因素:一项病例对照研究。
Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001892.
10
Maximizing screw length in expandable lateral lumbar interbody spacers with integrated fixation may obviate the need for supplemental pedicle screws.在具有一体化固定功能的可扩张性腰椎椎间融合器中最大化螺钉长度,可能无需额外使用椎弓根螺钉。
Spine J. 2025 Jul;25(7):1564-1573. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2025.01.035. Epub 2025 Jan 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Toward Identifying and Resolving the Challenges to the Prognostic Validation of the Classifications for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: A Narrative Review.识别和解决胸腰椎爆裂骨折分类预后验证面临的挑战:一项叙述性综述
Clin Spine Surg. 2025 Jul 1;38(6):266-277. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001764. Epub 2025 Mar 24.
2
Impact of Treatment Modalities and Fracture Stability on Survival in Thoracolumbar Fractures: A 5-Year Observational Study.治疗方式和骨折稳定性对胸腰椎骨折患者生存率的影响:一项为期5年的观察性研究
J Clin Med. 2025 Jan 31;14(3):933. doi: 10.3390/jcm14030933.
3
Minimally Invasive Versus Open Surgery for Thoracolumbar Fractures Treatment : A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials and Prospective Studies.
微创与开放手术治疗胸腰椎骨折:随机对照试验和前瞻性研究的Meta分析
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2025 Mar 15;50(6):412-419. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005252. Epub 2025 Jan 3.
4
Which is the Superior Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Tool? TLICS Versus AOSpine 2013: A Systematic Review.哪种是胸腰段脊柱损伤的最佳分类工具?胸腰段损伤分类及严重程度评分(TLICS)与AO脊柱2013分类法:一项系统评价
Global Spine J. 2025 May;15(4):2536-2546. doi: 10.1177/21925682241311303. Epub 2024 Dec 25.
5
Outcomes of Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Treated With Open Versus Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Posterior Spinal Stabilization: A Retrospective Study at a Rural Teaching Hospital in South India.开放手术与微创经皮后路脊柱内固定治疗胸腰椎爆裂骨折的疗效:印度南部一家农村教学医院的回顾性研究
Cureus. 2024 Aug 21;16(8):e67429. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67429. eCollection 2024 Aug.
6
Thoracolumbar Fractures: Comparing the Effect of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Schanz Screw Techniques on Sagittal Alignment.胸腰椎骨折:比较微创与开放Schanz螺钉技术对矢状面排列的影响
Cureus. 2024 Jun 26;16(6):e63187. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63187. eCollection 2024 Jun.
7
Validation and Comparison of Common Thoracolumbar Injury Classification Treatment Algorithms and a Novel Modification.常见胸腰椎损伤分类治疗算法及一种新型改良方法的验证与比较
Neurosurgery. 2025 Jan 1;96(1):172-182. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003055. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
8
Interobserver Reliability in the Classification of Thoracolumbar Fractures Using the AO Spine TL Injury Classification System Among 22 Clinical Experts in Spine Trauma Care.在22位脊柱创伤护理临床专家中,使用AO脊柱胸腰椎损伤分类系统对胸腰椎骨折进行分类时的观察者间可靠性。
Global Spine J. 2024 Feb;14(1_suppl):17S-24S. doi: 10.1177/21925682231202371.
9
Percutaneous monoplanar screws versus hybrid fixed axial and polyaxial screws in intermediate screw fixation for traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a case-control study.经皮单平面螺钉与混合固定轴向和多轴向螺钉治疗创伤性胸腰椎爆裂骨折中的中间螺钉固定:一项病例对照研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jan 22;19(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04547-9.
10
Treatment of thoracolumbar fractures: comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes of percutaneous versus open surgery.胸腰椎骨折的治疗:经皮与开放手术的临床与影像学结果比较。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023 Aug;33(6):2393-2397. doi: 10.1007/s00590-022-03444-3. Epub 2022 Nov 29.