Suppr超能文献

与固定轴螺钉和多轴螺钉相比,单平面椎弓根螺钉治疗胸腰椎椎体骨折的临床和影像学结果的回顾性分析。

Retrospective analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes of thoracolumbar vertebral fractures treated with monoplanar pedicle screws compared with fixed-axis and polyaxial screws.

作者信息

Duan Wei, Zhao Xin, Chang Le, Sun Zhen, Lai Kangwei, Zhang Jingchun, Tian Buqi, Ye Zhengxu

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

Department of Aerospace Medicine, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 24;12:1605583. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1605583. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Pedicle screw fixation is widely utilized in thoracolumbar fractures to restore vertebral height and spinal alignment. Screw head design varies among fixed-axis (rigid), polyaxial (multiplanar mobility), and monoplanar (coronal mobility) types, impacting surgical outcomes. This study compares clinical and radiological outcomes of these screws.

METHODS

Seventy-five patients (2020-2024) with thoracolumbar fractures were divided into three groups: Group A (fixed-axis screws,  = 31), Group B (polyaxial screws,  = 19), and Group C (monoplanar screws,  = 25). Operative time, blood loss, radiographic parameters (anterior body compression index, vertebral body angle, regional Cobb angle), and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores were assessed preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 3 and 12 months.

RESULTS

Group C (monoplanar) demonstrated significantly lower blood loss (64 ± 11.1 mL vs. 308.6 ± 88.8 mL,  < 0.05) and shorter operative time (88 ± 8.2 min vs. 158.9 ± 27.8 min,  < 0.05) than Group A, with no significant differences compared to Group B. Postoperative VAS improved across all groups ( < 0.05), though Group A had slightly higher scores. Radiographic correction loss occurred in all groups at 12 months ( < 0.05), but was more pronounced in Group B. No complications (infection, nerve injury) were observed.

CONCLUSION

Monoplanar pedicle screws, combining coronal mobility for minimally invasive placement and sagittal rigidity for stability, reduce blood loss and operative time compared to fixed-axis screws while maintaining comparable correction retention to polyaxial screws. These findings position monoplanar screws as a balanced option for thoracolumbar fracture fixation, optimizing minimally invasive benefits without compromising mechanical strength.

摘要

背景

椎弓根螺钉固定术在胸腰椎骨折中被广泛应用,以恢复椎体高度和脊柱排列。螺钉头部设计在固定轴(刚性)、多轴(多平面活动)和单平面(冠状面活动)类型之间有所不同,影响手术效果。本研究比较了这些螺钉的临床和放射学结果。

方法

将75例(2020 - 2024年)胸腰椎骨折患者分为三组:A组(固定轴螺钉,n = 31)、B组(多轴螺钉,n = 19)和C组(单平面螺钉,n = 25)。在术前、术后以及3个月和12个月时评估手术时间、失血量、影像学参数(椎体前缘压缩指数、椎体角度、节段Cobb角)和视觉模拟评分(VAS)。

结果

C组(单平面)与A组相比,失血量显著更低(64±11.1 mL对308.6±88.8 mL,P<0.05),手术时间更短(88±8.2分钟对158.9±27.8分钟,P<0.05),与B组相比无显著差异。所有组术后VAS均有改善(P<0.05),尽管A组评分略高。所有组在12个月时均出现影像学矫正丢失(P<0.05),但在B组中更明显。未观察到并发症(感染、神经损伤)。

结论

单平面椎弓根螺钉结合了用于微创置入的冠状面活动和用于稳定性的矢状面刚性,与固定轴螺钉相比,减少了失血量和手术时间,同时与多轴螺钉保持相当的矫正维持效果。这些发现表明单平面螺钉是胸腰椎骨折固定的一个平衡选择,在不影响机械强度的情况下优化了微创益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/042e/12328457/7989a84ed5ab/fmed-12-1605583-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验